Controlled source — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Also named here as symmetric matrix, transfer impedance — the same set of essays touches all of them, so they are one junction rather than several.
The reading that does not care which way round it is
Inject a current at one end of a network and read the voltage at the other; then swap the two. A passive network gives back the same number — not a similar one, but the same to five parts in ten to the fourteenth over four decades of frequency, and for a coupled pair of windings the same double. Put a transconductance of eight tenths of a femtosiemens anywhere in it and the two readings part company.
The reading that does care which way round
The rung below measured a network's departure from reciprocity and left its size as a constant — 62.8 per siemens, for that network at that frequency. It is not a constant and it is not the network's: it is 2πfL for the single inductor between the controlled source's control node and its output node, 62.832 ohms at ten kilohertz, and the ratio of the two readings is 1 − gm·Z to 8.8 parts in 10¹⁴ over ninety-nine readings. So 4.5455 millisiemens across a 220 ohm branch makes a ladder that transmits a hard zero forwards at every frequency at once, and 206.13 ohms back at ten kilohertz.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Modified nodal analysisMutual inductanceReciprocitySymmetric matrixTransconductanceTransfer impedanceEnergy-storageGyratorNullorTwo-port