Circuit Response
every model has an edge, and the figure carries it
Recently added

What's new

Essays arrive in groups rather than one at a time. The most recent group is below in full, and every earlier one after it, newest first.

Essays arrive in groups rather than one at a time, and a group usually opens up a subject not covered before. Between one group and the next nothing changes, so a reader who has seen the most recent group has seen everything.

1 November 2026

20 essays on the floor, which bounds from below, feedback, and the margin, circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over, where a signal becomes a number, frequency, which is the same solve, measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, where the models stop, networks, and how a solve is checked, devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at, filters, measured not tabulated, power, and the part that does no work, before the steady state, lines, where a wire has a length and two windings, and the band between them

Scaling a Chebyshev 5 with real 4 nV/√Hz amplifiers everywhere: 118.18 dB at equal maxima and 118.32 dB with no gain stages at all, so the gains cost 0.14 dB, where silent ones promised 2.16 dB. computed by solving, not by drawing: the dynamic range on ±15 V of a fifth-order Chebyshev with gains d^α in front of each section and after the last, against α. Every amplifier has a voltage noise of 4 nV/√Hz, the sections' own and the stages', and each stage carries a kilohm in its divider or lower feedback arm (solid). With every amplifier and gain silent (dashed), equal maxima recovers 2.16 dB over no scaling, 142.44 dB to 144.60 dB. With real ones: 118.32 dB with no stages, and with stages 115.75 dB at α = 0.2, 116.27 dB at α = 0.4, 116.86 dB at α = 0.6, 117.50 dB at α = 0.8, 118.18 dB at α = 1. Merely having the stages is a step down at the smallest α, since each is a real amplifier in the path, and the curve climbs from there to equal maxima. The response is unchanged to a part in a billion at every α. The floor, which bounds from below

The floor the gains bring

Equal-maxima scaling recovers 2.16 decibels of a fifth-order Chebyshev's range when its gains make no noise and its amplifiers make none either. Give every amplifier in the circuit a voltage noise of 4 nV/√Hz, the sections' own and the stages', and the unscaled filter reads 118.32 dB over a 1 MHz band and the scaled one 118.18: the last gain has nothing after it to filter its noise, so it multiplies 4 µV of wide-band noise by 2.83, and the lower ceiling is spent paying for it. At 1 nV/√Hz scaling costs 6.61 dB, and at 16 nV/√Hz it gains 0.99, so a noisier amplifier makes it look better. A narrower measuring band does not rescue it. On a Chebyshev 7, with a node 13.26 times the input, the same arrangement gains 6.15 dB.

5 figures A stage with its second pole at 3 times the bandwidth the product predicts settles within 0.1% in 5.06τ, against 6.91τ for the one-pole stage the product describes. computed by solving, not by drawing: the step of a stage whose amplifier has a second pole at r = 3 times GBW/G (solid), against the one-pole stage of the same product (dashed). Time is in units of τ = G/(2π·GBW). Settled within 0.1% at 5.055τ, against ln(1000) = 6.908τ, with the netlist of a gain-of-ten stage agreeing at 5.057τ. The stage with the second pole is usually faster, whatever it does on the way. Feedback, and the margin

The gain that stops making a stage faster

The gain–bandwidth product says a stage of gain G settles in time proportional to G, and a stage with a second pole does something else. Below r = 4 the closed loop's poles are a complex pair whose real part is half the sum of the open loop's, π times the second pole's frequency, with neither the gain nor the product in it: a 1 MHz amplifier with a 0.5 MHz second pole takes 4.10 µs to settle within 0.1 per cent at unity gain, 4.04 at two and 4.22 at five, where the product says 1.10 to 5.50. Above the knee at G = 4·GBW/f₂ the product returns. In between lies the fastest stage, r = 3.32 for a 0.1 per cent band, which settles in 3.44 time constants against the one-pole stage's 6.91: half the time, and not at the r that gives the widest band.

5 figures A Wien oscillator with a lamp for its lower gain arm, τ = 100 ms: the envelope rings 63.6 times in ten time constants at 63.6 Hz and settles at 1.000 V. computed by solving, not by drawing: three state equations marched through every cycle of the 1.59 kHz carrier. The peak at the network's node, over its settled value (solid), from a millivolt with a cold filament, against time in units of the filament's time constant τ = 100 ms. Cold, the 50 Ω filament asks for a gain of 11 and the output sits on the 12 V rail until the filament has warmed. It leaves the rail after 1.99 ms, falls through the operating point, overshoots and rings at 63.6 Hz with a damping ratio of 0.0225. The dashed bound is the linear loop's decay, exp(−(1 + m)t/2τ) with m = 0.8, and it contains neither the carrier's frequency nor the amplitude. The settled amplitude, 1.000 V at the node and 3.00 V at the output, is the one at which the filament is at 250 Ω. Circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over

The lamp that has to be slow

A small lamp in a Wien oscillator's gain network adjusts the gain to whatever each unit needs, so the margin a limiter spends is no longer spent, and the price is an amplitude loop of its own. The envelope is an integrator and the filament is a lag, which makes a second-order loop that rings at the square root of 2ω₀m/τ and decays at (1 + m)/2τ. The filament's ripple at twice the carrier is the only distortion, 0.201/ω₀τ. So the slowness that lowers the distortion lengthens the settling in exact proportion: distortion times settling is 0.163 cycles at any time constant, and 0.01 per cent takes a second at 1.59 kHz and 82 seconds at 20 Hz.

5 figures Three waveforms at 16 samples a period, sampled at the worst instant: the largest sample of a sine is 1.92% short, of a triangle 12.5%, of a clipped sine 0. computed by solving, not by drawing: three waveforms with the same period and the same peak, sampled 16 times a period at the phase that puts the peak midway between two samples (dots). The sine leaves its peak as the square of the time, the triangle in proportion to it, and the sine clipped at nine-tenths of its height does not leave it at all for as long as it stays flat. The largest sample therefore falls short by 1.92% for the sine, 12.5% for the triangle, 0 for the clipped sine, at one rate, for three waveforms with the same period. Where a signal becomes a number

The peak that is a corner

The largest of a set of samples falls short of a sine wave's peak as the square of the sample interval, and that law belongs to the sine. Measured over every sampling phase, a triangle's corner falls short as the first power, 12.5 per cent at sixteen samples a period against the sine's 1.92, a peak whose curvature vanishes as the fourth power, and a sine clipped at nine-tenths of its height reads exactly above seven samples a period. The order in which a waveform leaves its peak is the whole of the law, and it also fixes how much better the average reading is than the worst. A real corner is round at some scale, so the law bends where the samples resolve its top harmonic, and a parabola through three samples helps a round peak, barely touches a corner and makes a flat one worse.

5 figures A megohm part with one picofarad to its mounting, heavier at one end: 0.433 pF with that end driven and 0.233 pF turned round, 1.56° against 0.84° at 10 kHz. computed by solving, not by drawing: the angle of the impedance of a 1 MΩ resistor as 200 sections, with 1 pF in total from its film to its mounting tapered as c(x) ∝ 1 + a(1 − 2x), a = 0.6, read at the terminal with the far end grounded. Driving the end nearer the mounting (solid) it presents 0.433 pF and 1.56° at 10 kHz; turned round (dashed), 0.233 pF and 0.84°. The first-order weight is ∫c(x)(1 − x)²dx, which is C(1/3 + a/6) and C(1/3 − a/6). The part's total capacitance has not changed, nor has its resistance, and neither of the readings is that total. Frequency, which is the same solve

The resistor turned round

A resistor's stray capacitance is usually drawn as one capacitor across its ends, and a stray to the part's mounting is not one number. Read at the terminal with the far end grounded it is weighted by the square of the distance from ground, so a uniform stray counts as a third of itself, and turned round a part with a tapered stray reads differently: 0.433 pF one way and 0.233 pF the other from one picofarad in all. In the current through the part the weight is x(1 − x), a sixth, and the current reaching the far end is 3 dB down at ωRC = 9.18 rather than at one. Two readings of one part separate the total from the taper, and a distributed stray's phase never reaches a capacitor's: it stops at 45 degrees.

5 figures A ten-to-one divider with 15 pF of its arm behind a kilohm, stepped through 1 kΩ: one trimmer overshoots 0.00936% where an ideal source shows 13.2%, and the second branch that was exact no longer settles first. computed by solving, not by drawing: the step of the divider of the earlier essay, 9 MΩ and a trimmer over 1 MΩ with 100 pF direct and 15 pF behind a kilohm, through a source resistance of 1 kΩ, by residues. One trimmer at its calibrator setting (solid) overshoots 0.00936%, and the second branch that made the arm a scaled copy (dashed) rises without overshoot on the source's own lag. An ideal source (dotted) shows a 13.2% hook with one trimmer and nothing with two. A source resistance charges the input capacitance, 11.5 pF, so its lag and the hook act on one edge, and when they are comparable the hook's excess goes into shortening the lag. Measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit

The source the hook hides behind

A compensated divider with a late branch in its lower arm overshoots 13.2 per cent on an ideal step, and every measurement of that hook has been made from a source with no resistance. Through a real source the input capacitance charges first, and the hook and the source's lag act on the same edge. The overshoot is 10.5 per cent from 50 Ω, 4.13 from 300 Ω and gone by a kilohm, where the source's lag equals the hook's. The excess has not gone away: it is in the edge, which the screen shows 15 per cent faster than the source and the probe's capacitance allow. And the second branch that made the divider exact only makes its ratio exact, so from a kilohm the exact divider settles in 65.6 ns and the one with the hook in 44.

5 figures Eight stages of damping 0.8 against eight one-pole stages of the same bandwidth: settled within 1% at 18.75τ against 16.00τ, with 2.02% of overshoot. computed by solving, not by drawing: the step of eight identical second-order stages of damping ζ = 0.8, each with its half-power bandwidth at ω = 1, marched (solid), against eight one-pole stages with the same bandwidth from the closed Erlang step (dashed). Within 1% at 18.75τ against 16.00τ, the overshoot being 2.02% and each stage's delay 1.393 against one. At ζ = 1 the march agrees with the Erlang step of order sixteen. Where the models stop

The stage that overshoots a little

A stage with a little overshoot settles sooner than a one-pole stage of the same bandwidth, 3.53 time constants against 4.61 within one per cent, and a chain of them should do better still, since a stage at the right damping adds almost no spread. It does not. The saving is 17 per cent at two stages, 11 at four and 2 at eight, and at sixteen the chain is 5 per cent slower than the one-pole chain, because a stage's extra delay adds as the number of stages and the spread it removes adds only as the root. The best damping stays near 0.83 at every length, just short of letting the overshoot out of the band. In frequency the same stages are five times flatter at their best, at a different damping, and so the two edges of a chain ask for two different stages.

5 figures The same 15 pF spread along 2 kΩ of line, on a 1 ns edge: with 1 of its branches copied the output is flat to 1.07%, against 11.2% with one trimmer alone. computed by solving, not by drawing: the response to a 1 ns edge of a ten-to-one divider whose lower arm is 100 pF direct and 15 pF along a 2 kΩ resistive line, with one trimmer (dashed) and with the first 1 branch of the line's exact partial-fraction expansion copied into the upper arm (solid). The expansion's time constants are 12.2 ns, 1.35 ns, 486 ps and so on, as 1/(2k − 1)². Inverted numerically by Talbot's method, and the line itself checked against a netlist of sections. Measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit

The branches a square root needs

A resistive cable's late charge is a continuum and not one branch, and the partial fractions of its tanh are an exact description of it: 81.1 per cent of the capacitance behind a time constant of 12.2 ns, 9.01 per cent behind a ninth of that, 3.24 behind a twenty-fifth, all through the same kilohm. So a divider's upper arm can copy it one piece at a time. On a 1 ns edge one trimmer alone is 11.2 per cent out, one copied branch 1.07, two 0.252 and four 0.0353. The first branch does most of the work and the uncopied capacitance falls only as one over the count; what saves the rest is that a branch faster than the edge is averaged away. Faster edges ask for more branches, and the tolerance on the first ends the series before the arithmetic does.

5 figures What a simulator's small conductance reports: at 10⁻¹² S a resistive divider reads 5 V, 1 µA into a capacitor reads 1 MV with a residual at machine precision, and the slope says which of those belongs to the circuit. computed by solving, not by drawing on the nodal matrix at direct current, with a conductance g from each node to ground. A divider of two 1 kΩ on 10 V (flat, 5 V at every g); 1 µA into a capacitor, which the solver refuses without g and which reads I/g with it (slope −1, 1 MV at 10⁻¹² S, 100 mV at 10⁻⁵ S); a biased stage behind a coupling capacitor, 100 mV (flat until g is comparable with its 1 MΩ); and two capacitors in series on 10 V, whose node reads 0 mV at every g, since a conductance to ground is the only thing at that node and it has nothing to divide against. Every one of these passes Kirchhoff's law with g included to machine precision. The residual has no way to tell these answers apart. Networks, and how a solve is checked

The conductance added so it would invert

A solver that refuses a node with no direct-current path can be made to answer by adding a tiny conductance from every node to ground, which is what a circuit simulator does. Kirchhoff's law then holds to machine precision, and the numbers are of three kinds. A real divider's node is exact at any conductance. 1 µA into a capacitor reads a megavolt at 10⁻¹² S, ten times that at 10⁻¹³, and is purely the reciprocal of what was added. A floating 9 V source reads ±4.5 V, a centre tap nobody built, and follows the ratio of two conductances that do not exist. Scaling the conductance finds the first kind and misses the third. One test current per node finds them all, because a node held only by what was added has a resistance to ground near one over it.

5 figures An exponential stage at 20% output, with a loop gain of 1: second 2.5% from 4.97%, third 0.0415% from 0.165%, and fifth 0.68 ppm from 0.814 ppm. computed by solving, not by drawing: the harmonics of an exponential stage with emitter resistance, gm·Re = T, solved point by point on the implicit curve and transformed, at a fixed output fundamental of a fifth of the quiescent current, for T = 1 (dots a) against no feedback (dots b). 2: 2.5%, against 4.97%; 3: 0.0415%, against 0.165%; 4: 5.36 ppm, against 40.9 ppm; 5: 0.68 ppm, against 0.814 ppm; 6: 0.0202 ppm, against 0.0135 ppm; 7: 0.000245 ppm, against 0.000192 ppm; 8: 0.0000478 ppm, against 0.00000239 ppm; 9: 0.00000178 ppm, against 2.62e-8 ppm. The series gives the second and third at small drive: the implicit function's Taylor coefficients are 1/(1 + T), 1/2(1 + T)³ and (1 − 2T)/6(1 + T)⁵, and they agree. The third therefore has a null at T = ½, and past that it has the opposite sign, and feedback that reduces the low orders puts some of them back into the high ones. Devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at

The fifth a resistor adds

Local feedback's reputation is that it reduces distortion, and on the second order it does: 4.97 per cent falls to 2.5 at a loop gain of one and 0.46 at ten, with the output held fixed. The third has a null at a loop gain of exactly a half and comes back with its sign changed. And from the fifth upward, a harmonic rises above its open-loop value before it falls: the fifth 1.42 times, the sixth 5.23, the seventh 24.6, the ninth 960, peaking at a loop gain between six and twenty. The second order, carried back through the resistor, mixes with the signal and makes them. A total-harmonic reading shows only improvement throughout, because the second dominates it. A differential pair has no second order to carry back, and its fifth never passes its open-loop value.

5 figures Two loops with exactly 45° of margin and the same crossover: with 100% of the extra lag a delay, the step overshoots 28.7%, against 23.3% for two poles. computed by solving, not by drawing: the closed-loop step of a loop K·exp(−sD)/(s(1 + s/p)) with its crossover at one, its phase margin exactly 45°, and 100% of the 45° beyond the integrator supplied by the delay (solid), against the same margin from a lag alone (dashed). Delay 0.785, lag's pole absent. Overshoot 28.7% against 23.3%; settled within 2% at 7.03 against 7.06; gain margin 6.0 dB against no limit. Marched with a history buffer, and at δ = 1 checked against the exact series of the method of steps. Feedback, and the margin

The margin a delay spends

A phase margin can be made of a lag or of a delay, and the number is the same either way. Forty-five degrees from a lag overshoots 23.3 per cent, and forty-five degrees from a delay overshoots 28.7; at sixty degrees the sign reverses, 8.77 against 5.57, and the two cross near 54 degrees. The overshoot is the smaller difference. A two-pole loop's gain margin has no limit at all, and five per cent of its extra lag as delay brings that to 25.5 dB; with all of it delay the gain margin is 90°/(90° − margin), which is 6.0 dB at 45°, and nothing else is in the expression. Across twenty-one such loops the margin alone misses the overshoot by 13.1 points. The closed-loop peak, which already reads the whole band, misses by 1.2.

5 figures A follower section of Q = 5 on an amplifier 100 times the corner: +4.79% as designed from the formula; designed for that amplifier, exact at it, and +1.64% and −0.966% on parts 30% slow and fast. computed by solving, not by drawing: the realised Q of a unity-gain Sallen–Key section against the actual amplifier's gain–bandwidth, relative to the typical value it was chosen for, from the poles of the netlist. Designed from the textbook formula (solid): +6.51% at 0.7, +4.79% at 1, +3.78% at 1.3. Predistorted, with its capacitance ratio and resistors found by iteration on the netlist so that the typical part is exact (dashed): +1.64% at 0.7, exact at 1, −0.966% at 1.3. Predistortion moves the line down without changing its slope much: it removes the error the amplifier has in common and leaves what differs between amplifiers. Filters, measured not tabulated

The Q designed for the amplifier

A follower section's Q comes out 4.79 per cent high at Q = 5 with an amplifier a hundred times the corner, and nothing stops a designer asking for 4.771 so that the real circuit lands on 5.000. That removes the error the amplifier has in common and leaves what differs between amplifiers: parts 30 per cent slow and fast read +1.64 and −0.97 per cent. So the exchange rate is the spread itself, and it is large. One per cent of Q across ±30 per cent asks for 725 times the corner from the formula and 196 designed for the part. The design runs out at a definite ratio, 7.2 times at Q = 5, below which no value of its parts reaches the Q wanted. On a whole Chebyshev 5 the passband error falls from 1.43 dB to nothing on a typical part and 0.55 on a slow one.

5 figures A 640 kvar bank on a 16 MVA 400 V bus: alone its resonance with the supply is at h = 5.00, and with a 7% reactor in series at 3.01, with the bank's own null at 3.78 between that and everything above it. computed by solving, not by drawing: the impedance per phase at a 400 V bus, with a short-circuit level of 16 MVA and a 640 kvar correction bank, against harmonic order, in closed form and at the fifth by a netlist. The bank alone (dashed) resonates with the supply at h = 5.00, where the bus impedance peaks. With a reactor of 7% of the capacitor's fundamental reactance in series (solid), the bank's own series resonance is at h = 1/√0.07 = 3.78, a deep null, and the parallel peak has moved down to h = 3.01. Above the null the bank is an inductor, in parallel with the supply's inductance, so there is nothing for any higher harmonic to resonate with. Power, and the part that does no work

The reactor that keeps a bank out of it

A correction bank on a stiff bus resonates with the supply at a harmonic set by the two sizes, and at 640 kvar on 16 MVA that harmonic is the fifth, which it multiplies by 34. A reactor of 7 per cent of the capacitor's reactance in series puts a null at h = 3.78, and above that null the bank is an inductor, in parallel with another inductor, with nothing left to resonate. So the fifth is never raised at any size of bank. It was not free. The capacitor now stands 7.5 per cent above the bus, the resonance has gone below the null and can land on the third, 22.7 times at 654 kvar, and the number that looks like a detail, 7 rather than the 4 that would tune the bank to the fifth, is what keeps an ageing bank on the right side of its null.

5 figures A tank with its loss in its coil, Q = 3: the voltage is largest at 0.9972 of 1/√(LC) and in phase with the current at 0.9428, and neither is where the poles sit. computed by solving, not by drawing, by closed form and by a netlist of L, Rs and C. The impedance of a coil of inductance L and series resistance Rs across a capacitor, against frequency, for Q = √(L/C)/Rs = 3. The poles are the series circuit's, at 1/√(LC) with a damping of Rs/2L. The coil's own zero at −Rs/L moves the peak to ωₘ = 0.9972·ω₀ and the zero-phase point to ωᵣ = 0.9428·ω₀, and the ring is at 0.9860·ω₀. Four frequencies, which a series circuit's voltage across its resistor would have as one. Frequency, which is the same solve

The reading a coil leaves nearly exact

On a series resonator three readings of Q agreed exactly and two did not. A parallel tank whose loss is in its coil has no exact readings at all, and the order is not the one its schematic suggests. Its poles are the series circuit's, but the coil's own zero puts the peak, the zero-phase point and the ring at three different frequencies, and all of them below 1/√(LC). At Q = 3 the phase slope reads 16.2 per cent low, the stored energy 5.72 low and the peak height 5.42 high, while the bandwidth reads only 0.307 low: the loss that a parallel resistance stands in for tilts across the band, and the tilt is nearly antisymmetric about the centre, so the reading that spans it cancels it. The instrument's own source then decides what is being read.

5 figures A reference 0° behind the excitation at 20 kHz, after a calibration at +1000 µε: matched, the worst error is 5.79 ppm; with a tenth of a per cent of screen mismatch, 0.607%. computed by solving, not by drawing: the error of a synchronous reading of a 350 Ω quarter bridge through ten metres of screened pair, against the strain read, with the reference 0° from the excitation at the bridge and a shunt calibration at +1000 µε through the same reference, for a matched screen (solid) and for 0.01 and 0.1 per cent of mismatch. The calibration takes out cos(φ − θ), because it multiplies the signal at every strain. It cannot take out a voltage that does not scale with the strain, and the mismatch's leak is such a voltage: a hyperbola through zero at the calibration strain. Worst over ±2000 µε: 0%: 5.79 ppm, 0.01%: 606 ppm, 0.1%: 0.607%. Circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over

The reference that should be late

A carrier amplifier's reference is taken from the excitation because that is what the output is meant to be in phase with, and nothing says that is where it belongs. A screen mismatch's leak arrives late by the common-mode node's lag and the difference's together, 525 ns on ten metres of pair and a 350 Ω bridge, so a reference on the excitation reads sin 3.7° of it at 20 kHz: 0.607 per cent of error at a tenth of a per cent of mismatch, and 72.6 parts per million with the reference 3.7° late. The null is a delay rather than a phase and does not move with the mismatch, and a delayed reference allows about five times the carrier on any mismatched screen. How exactly it must be held narrows as mismatch times carrier.

6 figures Paralleling a 4 nV/√Hz amplifier on a 50 Ω source, summed through 100 Ω from each: the best is 1.19 dB at 140 parts, against 1.14 dB at 134 parts with a perfect summing node. computed by solving, not by drawing: the noise figure from a 50 Ω source against the number of amplifiers in parallel, each 4 nV/√Hz and 0.6 pA/√Hz, with a perfect summing node (dashed) and with their outputs averaged through 100 Ω each into one node (solid), which adds a thermal 4kTR/N at the node. The summing resistors' noise falls as 1/N exactly as the amplifiers' voltage noise does, so their ratio is the same at every N, and a summing resistor comparable with the resistance an amplifier's voltage noise is worth is a constant factor on that term. The floor, which bounds from below

The resistors that sum a hundred amplifiers

A hundred amplifiers in parallel across a 50 Ω source are an ideal transformer of ratio ten, and the summing network between them and the output is where the comparison was left. Its resistors turn out to be the least of it. N resistors averaging N outputs make the noise of R/N, falling exactly as the amplifiers' voltage noise does, so the resistor equal to a 4 nV/√Hz amplifier is about a kilohm at every N, and at 133 parts 200 Ω costs only a tenth of a decibel. The stage that was forgotten is whatever reads the sum. Averaging leaves it alone, so a following amplifier as good as one of the parts costs 12.14 dB, and each part needs a gain of 26 to bring that under a tenth. Parallel amplifiers then match a transformer with one ohm of winding.

5 figures A 0.2% part sampling 0 V after long at 10 V, holding 1 ms: the first reading is 109 ppm of the step, and the hundredth still 4.5 ppm, every one of them made from the same branches. computed by solving, not by drawing: the reading at each sample, as a fraction of the step, when a sample-and-hold with a 1 µF part of 0.2% absorption samples 0 V after a long time at 10 V, acquiring for 100 µs and holding for 1 ms. The first reading agrees with a march of the netlist. It is 109 ppm, the tenth 46.7 ppm, the hundredth 4.5 ppm and the four-hundredth 0.904 ppm. The earlier samples are still being read, and for far longer than an acquisition suggests, because each acquisition can reach a branch only in proportion to the fraction of its time constant it lasts. Before the steady state

The sample before the sample

A sample-and-hold whose capacitor has 0.2 per cent of dielectric absorption reads a 10 V step 109 parts per million wrong on the first sample after it, 46.7 on the tenth, and 4.5 on the hundredth, because every earlier sample is still in the dielectric. That error has been described as distortion, since it grows with the signal. It is not. The state is linear and one period is a single matrix, so the reading is a fixed weighted sum of earlier samples, a filter with a very long tail: a sine reads 28.1 parts per million low and its largest harmonic is 1.5 × 10⁻¹² of the fundamental. A filter can be undone. Subtracting fifty earlier samples takes a stepped signal from 51.6 parts per million to 1.61, and with the absorption known to 20 per cent it stops at 5.47.

5 figures A Gaussian edge read at 3 samples per rise, at the worst sampling phase: straight chords between the samples say the rise is 8.78% from its true value. computed by solving, not by drawing: a Gaussian edge (solid), its samples at 3 per 10–90% rise at the sampling phase that reads worst (dots), and the straight lines an instrument's linear interpolation draws through them (dashed). The chord crosses 10 and 90 per cent earlier and later than the edge does, because a Gaussian edge curves in opposite senses at the two thresholds. The reading is 1.0878 rises against 1. Where a signal becomes a number

The samples a rise time needs

A rise time is read from two thresholds, and an instrument that draws straight chords between its samples is wrong at each by an amount that goes as the square of the interval. For a Gaussian edge at the worst sampling phase that is 5.02 per cent at four samples per rise and 0.818 at ten; the rule of thumb of three to five is a five per cent rule, and one per cent takes nine. The reading is not monotonic in the rate: above 20.9 per rise a first-order edge reads exactly at whole numbers and 0.046 per cent at 24.5, because its two errors subtract at one phase, and a Gaussian edge reads worse there because its two add. Reconstructing before reading needs 1.87 per rise for one per cent, and at four times the edge's 3 dB bandwidth the reading is still 11.7 per cent out.

5 figures A line ten rises long stood in for by 20 LC sections, matched at both ends: the edge overshoots 17.5% and takes 1.66 rises to climb, where the line delivers it unchanged. computed by solving, not by drawing: an edge of 10–90% rise tr at the far end of a chain of 20 LC sections with a total delay of 10 tr, matched at both ends, marched (solid), against the same edge delayed by exactly 10 tr, which is what a line delivers (dashed). Overshoot 17.5%, rise 1.66 tr. With no reflections at either end, everything here is the chain's own dispersion: a section has a group delay that rises with frequency, so the fast end of the edge arrives late and rings behind it. Lines, where a wire has a length

The sections an edge needs

A chain of LC sections rings on an ideal step however many sections it has, because a step has energy all the way to the chain's cut-off. An edge has a top frequency, and for a matched chain carrying one the section count has a clean answer: for one per cent of overshoot, 6 sections on a line one rise long, 183 on ten rises and 5,760 on a hundred, 5.8 times the length in rises to the three-halves power, within a few per cent from end to end. So sections per rise is not a constant. A section's phase error goes as the cube of frequency and the inverse square of the count, and it accumulates along the line. A 1 ns edge on a metre of cable asks for 62 sections, a 100 ps edge for 2,048, and the delay is right long before the edge is.

5 figures A shorted reading at k = 0.99: within 1% of the leakage from 279 Hz to 112 kHz, too high below through the winding's resistance and above through the leakage's resonance with 100 pF, at 1.13 MHz. computed by solving, not by drawing, in closed form, and by a netlist with a coupling element at three frequencies. The reading Im(Z)/ω at the driven terminals of a 10 mH and 40 mH pair, with the other winding shorted through its own 1 Ω, 0.5 Ω in the driven winding and 100 pF across it, against frequency, as a fractional distance from the leakage L₁(1 − k²) = 199.00 µH. Below the band the short does not cancel the shared flux. Above it the leakage and the capacitance resonate, at 1.13 MHz, and the reading rises to meet them. Band: 279 Hz to 112 kHz, a ratio of 402.1. Two windings, and the band between them

The window that moves

A shorted winding reads its own leakage only above the frequency at which the short really cancels the shared flux, and only below the leakage's resonance with whatever capacitance is across it. A tighter coupling raises the first edge as one over the root of 1 − k², and it was expected to pull the second down and close the window. It raises the second as well, by the same factor. So the band is 82 Hz to 36 kHz at k = 0.9, 279 Hz to 112 kHz at 0.99 and 2.81 kHz to 1.12 MHz at 0.9999, about four hundred times wide throughout. Its width is 0.01·L₂/(R₂k√(L₁C)), with the leakage nowhere in it, so what closes the window is the winding and not the coupling. Reading the real part as well is exact on paper and limited by phase.

5 figures

Before that

Everything published earlier, newest first. Titles only — the cards are on the full listing.

28 October 2026

20 essays on circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over, before the steady state, networks, and how a solve is checked, two windings, and the band between them, the floor, which bounds from below, lines, where a wire has a length, power, and the part that does no work, where the models stop, filters, measured not tabulated, measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, where a signal becomes a number, frequency, which is the same solve, feedback, and the margin and devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at

15 October 2026

20 essays on circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over, where a signal becomes a number, the floor, which bounds from below, where the models stop, frequency, which is the same solve, networks, and how a solve is checked, filters, measured not tabulated, feedback, and the margin, before the steady state, devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at, two windings, and the band between them, power, and the part that does no work, lines, where a wire has a length and measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit

6 October 2026

20 essays on frequency, which is the same solve, where a signal becomes a number, measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, filters, measured not tabulated, where the models stop, circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over, power, and the part that does no work, lines, where a wire has a length, networks, and how a solve is checked, before the steady state, the floor, which bounds from below, feedback, and the margin, devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at and two windings, and the band between them

3 October 2026

20 essays on lines, where a wire has a length, where the models stop, frequency, which is the same solve, networks, and how a solve is checked, power, and the part that does no work, the floor, which bounds from below, circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over, feedback, and the margin, filters, measured not tabulated, where a signal becomes a number, before the steady state, measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at and two windings, and the band between them

1 October 2026

20 essays on lines, where a wire has a length, filters, measured not tabulated, where the models stop, where a signal becomes a number, feedback, and the margin, power, and the part that does no work, networks, and how a solve is checked, circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over, measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, the floor, which bounds from below, frequency, which is the same solve, before the steady state and devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at

27 September 2026

20 essays on the floor, which bounds from below, devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at, filters, measured not tabulated, before the steady state, circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over, frequency, which is the same solve, feedback, and the margin, lines, where a wire has a length, networks, and how a solve is checked, measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, where a signal becomes a number, where the models stop and power, and the part that does no work

26 September 2026

20 essays on feedback, and the margin, before the steady state, frequency, which is the same solve, lines, where a wire has a length, power, and the part that does no work, where a signal becomes a number, where the models stop, measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over, networks, and how a solve is checked, the floor, which bounds from below and filters, measured not tabulated

25 September 2026

20 essays on where a signal becomes a number, where the models stop, circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over, filters, measured not tabulated, feedback, and the margin, before the steady state, networks, and how a solve is checked, the floor, which bounds from below, measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, frequency, which is the same solve, devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at, lines, where a wire has a length and power, and the part that does no work

24 September 2026

20 essays on where the models stop, circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over, feedback, and the margin, the floor, which bounds from below, devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at, frequency, which is the same solve, lines, where a wire has a length, where a signal becomes a number, power, and the part that does no work, networks, and how a solve is checked, measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, before the steady state and filters, measured not tabulated

21 September 2026

20 essays on measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, the floor, which bounds from below, where a signal becomes a number, feedback, and the margin, networks, and how a solve is checked, frequency, which is the same solve, where the models stop, circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over, filters, measured not tabulated and before the steady state

17 September 2026

20 essays on frequency, which is the same solve, power, and the part that does no work, circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over, before the steady state, where the models stop and lines, where a wire has a length

16 September 2026

20 essays on the floor, which bounds from below, before the steady state, power, and the part that does no work, where a signal becomes a number, measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, where the models stop, frequency, which is the same solve, feedback, and the margin, circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over and networks, and how a solve is checked

14 September 2026

11 essays on circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over, networks, and how a solve is checked, measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, where the models stop and lines, where a wire has a length

13 September 2026

7 essays on where the models stop, frequency, which is the same solve, power, and the part that does no work and the floor, which bounds from below

11 September 2026

17 essays on where the models stop, frequency, which is the same solve, the floor, which bounds from below, circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over and lines, where a wire has a length

8 September 2026

25 essays on the floor, which bounds from below, circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over, power, and the part that does no work, before the steady state, measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, networks, and how a solve is checked, where a signal becomes a number, feedback, and the margin, filters, measured not tabulated, devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at and two windings, and the band between them

7 September 2026

25 essays on where the models stop, frequency, which is the same solve, lines, where a wire has a length, networks, and how a solve is checked, power, and the part that does no work, before the steady state, measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, feedback, and the margin, filters, measured not tabulated, devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at and two windings, and the band between them

1 September 2026

10 essays on where the models stop, power, and the part that does no work and two windings, and the band between them

31 August 2026

8 essays on where the models stop, the floor, which bounds from below, power, and the part that does no work, two windings, and the band between them and devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at

30 August 2026

6 essays on two windings, and the band between them and feedback, and the margin

29 August 2026

11 essays on where the models stop, frequency, which is the same solve, power, and the part that does no work, circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over, lines, where a wire has a length, networks, and how a solve is checked, before the steady state, where a signal becomes a number, filters, measured not tabulated and devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at

28 August 2026

11 essays on frequency, which is the same solve, power, and the part that does no work, lines, where a wire has a length, two windings, and the band between them, networks, and how a solve is checked, where a signal becomes a number, measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, feedback, and the margin, filters, measured not tabulated and devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at

26 August 2026

11 essays on lines, where a wire has a length, two windings, and the band between them, networks, and how a solve is checked, before the steady state, measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, where a signal becomes a number, feedback, and the margin, filters, measured not tabulated and devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at

24 August 2026

11 essays on networks, and how a solve is checked, lines, where a wire has a length, the floor, which bounds from below, before the steady state, measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, where a signal becomes a number, feedback, and the margin, filters, measured not tabulated and devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at

23 August 2026

11 essays on the floor, which bounds from below, networks, and how a solve is checked, lines, where a wire has a length, before the steady state, power, and the part that does no work, measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, feedback, and the margin, filters, measured not tabulated and devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at

22 August 2026

11 essays on the floor, which bounds from below, lines, where a wire has a length, before the steady state, power, and the part that does no work, measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, feedback, and the margin, filters, measured not tabulated and devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at

21 August 2026

11 essays on lines, where a wire has a length, measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, before the steady state, power, and the part that does no work, networks, and how a solve is checked, feedback, and the margin, frequency, which is the same solve, filters, measured not tabulated and devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at

19 August 2026

11 essays on power, and the part that does no work, networks, and how a solve is checked, measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, the floor, which bounds from below, before the steady state, devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at, feedback, and the margin, frequency, which is the same solve and filters, measured not tabulated

18 August 2026

11 essays on where the models stop, measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, before the steady state, lines, where a wire has a length, the floor, which bounds from below, networks, and how a solve is checked, power, and the part that does no work, devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at, feedback, and the margin and frequency, which is the same solve

16 August 2026

11 essays on networks, and how a solve is checked, before the steady state, where the models stop, feedback, and the margin, power, and the part that does no work, lines, where a wire has a length, frequency, which is the same solve and filters, measured not tabulated

15 August 2026

11 essays on circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over

14 August 2026

22 essays on where a signal becomes a number and two windings, and the band between them

11 August 2026

9 essays on lines, where a wire has a length, feedback, and the margin, the floor, which bounds from below, measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, power, and the part that does no work, frequency, which is the same solve and devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at

10 August 2026

3 essays on filters, measured not tabulated

6–8 August 2026

35 essays on devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at, where the models stop, frequency, which is the same solve, before the steady state, power, and the part that does no work, the floor, which bounds from below, measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, lines, where a wire has a length, filters, measured not tabulated, networks, and how a solve is checked and feedback, and the margin

Every essay, by subject · by subject · by thread · search