Theme

The thread: The schematic is a label

Two drawings of the same circuit with different placement are the same circuit, so the layout carries no information — which is exactly not true of a mechanism, where the geometry is the content. Schematics here are small, drawn in one hand, and put in a corner. The canvas belongs to the response.

A single-pole low-pass with its corner at 995 Hz. Solved at 209 frequencies. The straight-line sketch, drawn faintly, is 3.01 dB wrong at the corner and within a tenth of a decibel only below 152 Hz. The phase is already −5.7° a decade before the corner and −84° a decade after it.

Frequency, which is the same solve

One solve, read four ways

Reactance, phase, the corner frequency and the roll-off are not four ideas. They are four readings of one complex number, obtained from the same matrix that answers direct-current questions — and the straight-line sketch every engineer draws of them is itself a model, three decibels wrong exactly where it is read.

A network solved, and checked: a bridge, which no series-parallel reduction reaches. Node potentials from modified nodal analysis. The branch currents are then recomputed from each element's own law and summed at every node; the residual is 2.7e-16 of the largest current in the circuit, which is floating-point rounding and nothing else.

Networks, and how a solve is checked

What a network answers, and how the answer is checked

A circuit has exactly one answer and a matrix finds it. The part that matters is not that the answer exists but that it can be checked twice, by routes that share no arithmetic — and that a circuit with no answer is refused by name rather than returned as a large plausible number.

10.0 cm of track, solved as a lumped circuit and as a line. The two agree to 0.030% at 3.97 MHz, where the track is one degree long, and to 30.1% at 143 MHz, where it is a tenth of a wavelength. Above that the lumped model is not approximately right; it is describing a different object.

Where the models stop

Kirchhoff's own frequency

The current law says the current entering a node equals the current leaving it at the same instant, which assumes the signal crosses the circuit in no time. It crosses at about two-thirds the speed of light, so the law has a frequency of its own — set by nothing but the physical size of the board.

Matching 50 Ω to 200 Ω with 51.7 mm of 100.0 Ω line. computed by solving, not by drawing at 261 frequencies. The reflection at the design frequency is 4.6e-17 — nothing, to the arithmetic — against 0.600 for the bare junction, which throws 36% of the power back. It stays under 0.1 from 0.914 to 1.086 of that frequency, a band of 17.1%.

Lines, where a wire has a length

A quarter wave, and the path the current takes back

A line a quarter of a wavelength long, whose impedance is the geometric mean of the two it joins, matches them exactly — reflecting 5×10⁻¹⁷ of what arrives, which is the arithmetic's floor. At one frequency. Seventeen per cent either side of it the reflection is back to a tenth, and that band is the whole of what the technique is worth.

A 100 nF capacitor, and what it is above 14.5 MHz. The dashed line is 1/(ωC), which is what the symbol means. The solid line is the same part with 30 mΩ of series resistance and 1.2 nH of series inductance, solved. They part company at 4.69 MHz and by a decade above resonance the part's impedance is 99.0× what its capacitance predicts.

Frequency, which is the same solve

The capacitor that is an inductor

A hundred-nanofarad capacitor follows 1/(2πfC) for four decades and then turns round and climbs. Above 14.5 MHz it is an inductor, and a decade past that its impedance is ninety-nine times what its capacitance predicts — all of it caused by about a nanohenry of lead and via that nobody chose and nobody drew.

The floor an amplifier adds, against the source it is given. computed by solving, not by drawing. A part with 4.00 nV/√Hz of voltage noise and 0.60 pA/√Hz of current noise is quietest into 6.67 kΩ, where its noise figure is 1.138 dB. That resistance is the ratio of the two generators and the floor there depends only on their product. Matching the same part for maximum power into its own 1 MΩ input instead — a resistance 150 times larger — costs 12.57 dB.

The floor, which bounds from below

The floor a circuit has

A resistor's noise is 4kTR and there is nothing to choose about it. An amplifier adds two generators that belong to the device — 4 nV/√Hz in series with its input and 0.6 pA/√Hz across it — and because one matters most into a small source and the other into a large one, there is a source resistance at which their sum is least. It is 6.67 kΩ, it is the ratio of the two, and it is not the resistance that transfers maximum power.

A common-emitter stage with 2.0 pF from collector to base. computed by solving, not by drawing. The stage's midband gain is 144.7 and its −3 dB point is at 504 kHz. The Miller approximation lumps 311 pF at the input and predicts 643 kHz — 21.6% high. The network's second pole is at 336 MHz and its right-half-plane zero at 3.08 GHz, both of which the approximation has no room for.

Devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at

The frequency a device sets for itself

A common-emitter stage's bandwidth is decided by two picofarads between its collector and its base. The Miller approximation says how — lump it at the input, multiplied by one plus the gain — and predicts 643 kHz where the solved network gives 504 kHz. Twenty-two per cent optimistic, and it has no room at all for the second pole or for the zero in the right half-plane that the network also has.

One per cent on one component, in two realisations of the same order-5 filter. computed by solving, not by drawing. The two realisations agree to 3e-14 dB before anything is moved. Moving each element in turn by 1%, the worst deviation at the 2 ripple peaks is 0.1621 dB for the cascade and 0.0030 dB for the LC ladder — 54 times smaller. Across the whole passband the two are within 3% of each other, because near the band edge both are dominated by the response's own steepness rather than by the realisation.

Filters, measured not tabulated

A ladder is not a cascade

The same fifth-order Chebyshev, built two ways. A one per cent component moves the buffered cascade's passband by 0.162 dB at the ripple peaks and the doubly terminated LC ladder's by 0.003 dB — fifty-four times less. The number is not the claim: the claim is the exponent. Fitted over two decades of tolerance the cascade's error grows as the 0.99 power and the LC ladder's as the 2.00 power, because at maximum power transfer the response is stationary in every element it contains.

The return under 10.0 cm of track, 200 µm above the plane. computed by solving, not by drawing, as an estimate from the geometry: a low-frequency path assumed to be three track-widths wide, 83.3 mΩ, and the parallel-plate inductance µ₀h/w, 125.7 nH, which is the limit for a track much wider than its height. The estimated resistance and reactance are equal at 106 kHz. Solved across the plane instead of assumed, the return does not change path at one frequency: it gathers beneath the track across a band about three decades wide, and this corner falls inside that band. Above the band the loop is the track's length times its height, 20.0 mm², and a milliamp round it at 100 MHz radiates -1.1 dBµV/m at three metres.

Lines, where a wire has a length

Where the current comes back

The return current under a track spreads out at low frequency and runs directly beneath it at high. Estimated from two paths chosen in advance, the change is a corner at 106 kilohertz for any track two hundred micrometres above a half-milliohm plane, with neither the length of the track nor its width in it. Solved, it is a band three decades wide rather than a corner, and the width enters it after all — but the length is still absent and the stack-up still sets the top, which is the part of the argument a designer needs.

Filters, measured not tabulated

Flat delay, bought with more delay

An all-pass section has a magnitude of one at every frequency — measured here on a solved network as 1 to within 9 × 10⁻¹⁶ over six decades — which makes it the only thing that can change a filter's delay without touching its magnitude response. It flattens by adding. A fifth-order Chebyshev's 891 microseconds of delay variation comes down to 498, and everything leaves 722 microseconds later than it did.

A coupled pair as a two-port, at k = 0.8. computed by solving, not by drawing. Each port driven in turn with the other open, four solves, and the four impedance parameters read out. The diagonal terms measure each winding's own inductance — 10.0000 mH and 40.0000 mH against 10 and 40 — and both transfer terms measure the mutual inductance, 16.0000 mH against k√(L₁L₂) = 16.0000. The two transfer terms agree to 2.83e-16, which is reciprocity — a property of the device rather than of the measurement, and the first thing a coupling stamped into the wrong row would break. Neither of this site's two standing checks can see it: a coupling adds no current and dissipates nothing.

Two windings, and the band between them

Two ports from two one-ports

An inductor is a one-port: one impedance, one number. Two of them coupled is a two-port, and the four impedance parameters that describe it are recovered here by four solves — each port driven with the other open, the definition read literally. Two of the four come out equal to 2.8 × 10⁻¹⁶, which is reciprocity, and is the first property a coupling stamped into one row instead of two would break.

A series-terminated net holds half a swing for 1.0 delays at 50% along it. computed by solving, not by drawing. What a receiver 50% of the way along one net sees under three terminations, from a lattice evaluated at that point rather than at the ends. The shaded strip is the interval in which a logic input has no defined answer — between 30% and 70% of the swing. The series-terminated net sits in it for 4.83 ns, which is 2(1 − x) delays exactly and is zero only at the far end; the unterminated net sits in it for 4.83 ns and then overshoots by 82%; the parallel-terminated net never does, and draws 60 mA down the line for as long as the level is held.

Lines, where a wire has a length

The resistor at the wrong end

A lattice diagram is read at the two ends of a line, and that is where the two respectable terminations look identical: a clean step, one delay late, at the receiver. Anyone standing halfway along a series-terminated net sees half the swing held for a full round trip, which for a logic input is not a level at all. The interval is 2(1−x) delays exactly, it is zero only at the far end, and the scheme that never has it draws sixty milliamperes for as long as the level is held.

Rejection is not a property of the loop. The same regulator with the same loop gain and the same 46.5° of phase margin, drawn twice. With the amplifier's output referred to ground the rail reaches the output at -67.3 dB at the bottom and 5.79 dB at 10.0 kHz — where it is amplified. Referred to the rail instead, every point is 60.00 dB lower, which is 20 log(gm·ro) for the pass device and not a design choice.

Circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over

What gets through from the rail

A regulator's job is to hold its output still while its input moves, and the measurement says it does that well at ten hertz, badly at a kilohertz, and not at all at ten kilohertz — where this one puts out 1.9 times what arrives. Then the same netlist with one node moved, the same loop gain and the same 46.5 degrees of margin, rejects 60.009 decibels better at every frequency in six decades. The sixty decibels is the pass device's own intrinsic gain and it is not a design choice.

The first conduction carries 26× the repetitive peak, and the factor of 7 is the user's. computed by solving, not by drawing. The largest diode current in the first conduction after switch-on, against the phase of the mains at the instant of switching, marched from an empty capacitor through the same netlist the ripple and the conduction angle are read from. The settled circuit's largest current is 1.230 A; the first one is 32.39 A at the worst instant and 4.64 A at the best, so which of them a design has to survive is decided by nothing in the design. The estimate that treats the capacitor as a short circuit gives 34.00 A, 4.7% high, the difference being the charge the capacitor takes during the pulse itself. Holding the first peak to ten times the repetitive one would need 1.90 Ω of winding resistance.

Power, and the part that does no work

The first cycle, which no steady state contains

Every number this field computes about a rectifier — the ripple, the crest factor, the conduction angle, the power factor — is read from the settled state, and the march that produces them starts from an empty capacitor and throws the first cycle away. That first conduction carries 32.4 amperes against a repetitive peak of 1.23, it is 26 times larger than anything the circuit ever does again, and how large it is depends on when somebody's hand closed the switch.

A part in ten thousand of ratio, and half a degree that costs 18% of a power reading. computed by solving, not by drawing. The two errors of a 1000:1 current transformer into a 10 Ω burden, read off one solve of a netlist driven by a current source. The magnetising inductance puts a high-pass under the measurement with a corner at 0.456 Hz, so the ratio error falls as the frequency rises — and stops falling at 100 parts per million, which is 1 − k and is a coupling rather than a frequency. The phase error falls too and is worth far more: 0.522° at 50 Hz is 0.0142% of the current and 18.2% of the power at a power factor of 0.05. What bounds it from above is not on this plot: the burden voltage is integrated by the core, so the largest primary current is 916 A at 50 Hz and proportionally more at 400.

Measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit

The ammeter that is not in the circuit

A shunt measures a current by putting a resistance in the circuit, and every objection to it follows from that. A current transformer puts nothing in the circuit at all — a thousand-turn secondary reflects twelve microhms into the primary — and charges for it in a different currency: no response at direct current, a ratio error that stops falling at one minus the coupling, and a phase error of half a degree at fifty hertz that costs eighteen per cent of a power reading at a power factor of 0.05.

Filters, measured not tabulated

A resistor made of a clock

A capacitor shuttled between two nodes at a megahertz behaves as a megohm, and a tenth of a picofarad shuttled at ten kilohertz behaves as a gigohm — which is how a filter with a one-hertz corner fits on a chip. What the equivalence costs is three conditions, and they bind on three different quantities: a capacitor ratio under 0.0201, a signal below half the clock, and a clock below the frequency at which the charge stops arriving.

$A 350 Ω bridge, with ideal leads. The straight line is the expression every textbook gives, Vδ/4; the curve is the solve. They part company at half the fractional change — 0.498% at 1.0% — so the tangent is worth one per cent only up to 2.020%. Driving the bridge from a current source instead halves the departure at every point and moves that edge to 4.040%.$ Circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over

The bridge that is linear near one point

The expression for a Wheatstone bridge's output is V delta over four, and the solve says it is V delta over two times two plus delta — low by half the fractional change, exactly, at every change tested. So the tangent is worth one per cent only up to a two per cent change and a tenth of a per cent only up to two tenths. Driving the bridge from a current source instead halves the departure at every point and doubles both edges, which is a change of one component and no change at all to the four resistors being measured.

A ±15% envelope on what a bridge reads permits 29 points of working capacitance. computed by solving, not by drawing. The charge-average capacitance between zero and the rated voltage — the number a reservoir or a hold capacitor obeys — against how the data sheet's stated temperature change is divided between the model's two parameters. Every point honours the envelope exactly: the measured value at zero bias with a one-volt test signal is 15 per cent from nominal at each point on each curve, by construction. The working capacitance is not. At the cold end it is anywhere from -42.9 to -13.9 per cent — 29.0 points of ambiguity at a temperature where the measured value is pinned exactly — and at the hot end from 13.9 to 36.2. Across the whole envelope that is 79.0 points against the 30 the specification bounds, a factor of 2.63. The left-hand end of the upper curve is missing because it is impossible: with the amplitude fixed, no characteristic voltage makes the measured value exceed the zero-bias capacitance.

Frequency, which is the same solve

The coefficient that is about one reading

A class II ceramic's temperature coefficient is a third printed number, and it is a coefficient of the one capacitance a data sheet reports: what a bridge sees at zero bias with a one-volt test. The model behind the part has two parameters, one number does not determine two, and every way of dividing a ±15 per cent envelope between them honours the envelope exactly while putting the working capacitance anywhere across twenty-nine points — and two parts a bridge cannot tell apart differ by 1.80 at the voltage they are used at.

One part, two corners: 3.98 kHz to the common mode and 7.86 MHz to the signal. computed by solving, not by drawing. Two windings on one core with a coupling of 0.999, driven twice from the same netlist — once with the two conductors in opposition, which is the signal, and once with them in parallel, which is everything the cable picked up. The mode that goes the same way round both windings meets (1+k)L and is down three decibels by 3.98 kHz; the mode that goes opposite ways meets the leakage, (1−k)L, and is untouched until 7.86 MHz. The ratio is 1975, which is 2/(1−k) and contains no inductance at all. Neither number is computed here: both modes are driven and the answer is read.

Lines, where a wire has a length

The inductor one mode cannot see

Two windings on one core present a millihenry to a current that goes the same way round both and a microhenry to one that goes opposite ways, so the same component has a corner at 3.98 kHz and another at 7.86 MHz — a ratio of two thousand, which is 2/(1−k) and contains no inductance at all. It is bought to remove the conversion the previous essay measured, and five picofarads across each winding turn it over at 1.59 MHz and leave it worth 0.02 decibels by ten gigahertz.

A bridge's reading turns over at 1.885 V, where the test level stops mattering. computed by solving, not by drawing. What a bridge reads is the fundamental of the charge waveform over the fundamental of the voltage, so it is a function of the bias AND of the amplitude, and a data sheet names one point of it: zero bias, one volt. The four curves are four test levels on one part. At zero bias they run from 9.999 µF down to 8.312 µF — the harder the drive the lower the reading, because the capacitance is at its maximum there and a sinusoid spends most of its time off the peak. At the rated 5 volts they run the other way, 2.000 µF up to 2.426 µF, because the curve is convex. Between them is one bias where the two effects cancel: at 1.8848 V a tenfold change of test level moves the reading by nothing at all, and that voltage is 0.6645 of the polarisation's own characteristic voltage.

Frequency, which is the same solve

The reading a data sheet does not take

A class II ceramic's temperature envelope leaves its working capacitance 29 points wide at one end and 79 across, because one printed number cannot pin a two-parameter model. One further bridge reading recovers almost all of it — and where the reading is taken decides everything. Turning the test level down to a fiftieth separates five parts a data sheet cannot tell apart by 17.76 per cent; moving the bias to half the rated voltage separates them by 176.02, and pins the working capacitance to ±0.512 per cent from a reading known to one.

The floor, which bounds from below

The resistor the noise comes from

Two identical 1.59 kΩ resistors in one third-order filter contribute 60.0 and 40.0 per cent of its output noise, because a resistor's noise is filtered by everything after it and by nothing before it. Solved one resistor at a time, the rule everybody carries — the resistance in the noise bandwidth — comes out 1.551 times the truth on a seventh-order Chebyshev and 0.791 times on a sixth-order Bessel. It is wrong in both directions on the same axis, so no factor repairs it.

Three nanohenries of copper move the peak to 5.63 MHz and raise it to 1.29 Ω. computed by solving, not by drawing. The same two capacitors, with and without the inductance of the way to them: one nanohenry of mounting loop per part and two nanohenries of plane between the bank and the load. The dashed curve is the bank with no inductance in the way, peaking at 1.187 Ω at 6.52 MHz; the solid one is what the load sees, peaking at 1.293 Ω at 5.63 MHz. The peak moves down because the branch that is inductive at that frequency got more inductive, and it rises for the same reason. Above about twenty megahertz the two part company entirely: the bank is still falling toward its parts' own resistances and the load is rising on two nanohenries that no capacitor is across.

Power, and the part that does no work

The capacitor that is not where the load is

A decoupling bank is usually drawn as two capacitors joined to a load through nothing, which is a stated simplification. Put three nanohenries of ordinary copper in — one of mounting loop per part and two of plane between the bank and the load — and the anti-resonance moves down to 5.63 megahertz and up to 1.29 ohms, a probe touching the ceramic reads a twelfth of what the load sees at 16.7 megahertz and three and a half times too much at 8.35, and the twentieth capacitor is worse than the second.

Every node of a Chebyshev 5, and the one that clips first. computed by solving, not by drawing. The largest signal each node of the realised network ever carries, over the whole frequency sweep, relative to the input. The output reaches 1.000 times the input and F0b reaches 4.537, so on a ±15 V supply the input can be driven to 3.31 V rather than 15.00 before something clips — and the thing that clips is not the output. With the floor at 249.7 nV that is 142.44 dB of range against the 155.57 dB an instrument on the output would report, a difference of 13.14 dB that no measurement at the output can see.

The floor, which bounds from below

The ceiling is not at the output

A fifth-order Chebyshev's noisiest node is its output and its largest signal is not. F0b carries 4.537 times the input, so on ±15 V the range is 142.44 decibels and not the 155.57 an instrument on the output reports. Across fifteen realised filters the output reading spans 3.97 dB and the range they actually have spans 22.34 — and one family of the three has no internal peaking at all, at any order.

A clean board is 14.0 mV of error, and a guard makes it 1.0 nV. computed by solving, not by drawing. Two boards differing by one wire, solved with the leakage present and again with it removed, so the number plotted is the leakage's own contribution and nothing else. Unguarded, a teraohm across the laminate from a 15 V rail through a 1 GΩ source is 13.99 millivolts — and a humid morning takes that resistance down two decades, which is the left-hand end of this axis. Guarded, the ring is held at the input's own potential by the amplifier, so what is across the leakage is the amplifier's own error and the result is 1.00 nanovolts. The guarded line is flat in the rail and proportional to the signal: the offset has become a gain error of 1.00 parts per billion, and the reading is low by it rather than high: the ring sits a little below the input, so the last of the leakage pulls the input down.

Measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit

The current that does not reach the input

A teraohm across a board from a fifteen-volt rail is fourteen millivolts of error through a gigohm source, and a humid morning takes that resistance down two decades. A ring held at the input's own potential leaves a nanovolt — proportional to the signal rather than to the rail, so an offset has become a gain error of one part in a billion — and the same wire multiplies the input resistance by the loop gain, which makes it 10¹⁸ Ω at direct current and 10¹² Ω at a megahertz.

A one-henry inductor with nothing magnetic in it, good for 3.6 decades. computed by solving, not by drawing. The impedance at the input of an Antoniou impedance converter, read as an inductance: a current source drives the node and the voltage is solved for, and the imaginary part divided by ω is what is plotted. Five components — four resistors of 10 kΩ and a 10 nF capacitor — behave as 1000 mH, which as a wound coil would be several henries of wire. It is that inductance to within one per cent from 1.00 Hz to 3.65 kHz, 3.56 decades, and the upper edge belongs to the amplifiers rather than to the arrangement: with ideal ones in the same netlist the inductance is exact everywhere drawn. Nothing in it stores energy in a magnetic field — the current lags because an amplifier is holding a capacitor's voltage somewhere else in the loop.

Filters, measured not tabulated

The inductor that is an amplifier

Four resistors and a capacitor, arranged around two amplifiers, present one henry at a node — an inductance with nothing magnetic in it, which as a wound coil would be several henries of wire. It is that inductance to within one per cent over three and a half decades, and its series resistance goes negative at 63 hertz, which is well inside the band where it is still an excellent inductor. A resonator built around it there does not have a high quality factor; it has a negative loss, and starts on its own noise.

$A tenth of a per cent of lead is 999 µε of strain that is not there. computed by solving, not by drawing. A 350 Ω quarter bridge at zero load, against the resistance in each lead. With both leads in the changing arm the output is 4.99500 mV at 350 mΩ — an apparent fractional change of 0.1998%, which at a gauge factor of 2 is 999 microstrain. With one lead in that arm and one in the arm beside it the output is zero to the last bit, at every lead resistance drawn. The lower panel is what the second arrangement costs: the sensitivity falls as 1/(1 + Rlead/R), which is 0.100% at the same lead and is a calibration constant rather than a drift.$ Circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over

The leads that are in the bridge

A strain gauge on the end of two long wires cannot be told from a strain gauge under load: both leads in the changing arm is bit for bit the same netlist as a quarter bridge whose fractional change is larger by twice the lead over the gauge, which at 350 milliohms on a 350 ohm gauge is 999 microstrain that is not there. Moving one of those leads into the arm beside it leaves the output at exactly zero for every lead resistance drawn, and turns a twenty-kelvin drift of 76.8 microstrain into 0.077. That factor is two over the strain being read — 999 at a thousand microstrain and 9990 at two hundred — and it costs 0.100 per cent of sensitivity.

Filters, measured not tabulated

The filter that samples

The rung below built a resistor out of a clock and measured two ways it is not one: a settling time, and a corner that is a capacitor ratio rather than an R–C product. Both are errors in a value and both get smaller as the design gets better. This is an error of a different kind — the arrangement is not a continuous system at all, and nothing below half the clock shows it. An input at 992 kilohertz arrives at 7.8 kilohertz with the passband's own gain, where the continuous model the rung below fitted says it is 56 decibels down.

One channel's load step reaches another through the supply, and the compensation decides by 4497×. computed by solving, not by drawing. Two identical amplifiers on one rail — sharing no signal node — with an ampere of load step pulled from the first and the second's output read. With the wiring left out the coupling is exactly zero, which is what the seven rungs below this one computed. With 30 nanohenries and fifty milliohms of rail and 10 microfarads of decoupling it is not: 3.84 microvolts per ampere at 271 kHz if the compensation capacitor returns to ground, and 17.29 millivolts per ampere at 2.33 MHz if it returns to the rail. That is a factor of 4497 decided by a modelling choice, which is why both are drawn. The channel that caused the step is unaffected: its own loop corrects the disturbance along with everything else, and the crosstalk is entirely a problem for the channel that did not.

Feedback, and the margin

The rail the load moves

Seven rungs of this ladder end by saying the same thing: the supply is an ideal voltage source, so a load step is drawn from a node that cannot be disturbed. Giving the rail an impedance turns out to change the disturbing channel's own output impedance by three parts in ten million — its loop corrects the supply along with everything else — and to open a path to a second amplifier that shares nothing with it but a wire. How large that path is is a modelling choice: 3.84 microvolts per ampere with the compensation capacitor returned to ground, 17.3 millivolts with it returned to the rail, a factor of four and a half thousand.

Twenty-four orderings, and 11 of them are choices. computed by solving, not by drawing. Every ordering of the four sections of an eighth-order 0.5 dB Chebyshev, at 16 bits, drawn against the two things an ordering decides. The horizontal axis is the round-off floor the arrangement adds — 24.2 least significant bits at best and 99.8 at worst. The vertical axis is the largest value any section's output reaches, which is what decides whether a word overflows: 0.088 of full scale at best and 0.699 at worst, a range of 18.0 decibels. 13 of the twenty-four are beaten on both counts by another ordering and are simply mistakes; the 11 on the lower-left frontier are the actual choices, and no one of them is best.

Where a signal becomes a number

Which section goes first

A cascade of four biquads can be assembled in twenty-four orders, all of which realise exactly the same transfer function. They do not cost the same: the round-off floor runs from 24 to 100 least significant bits and the largest value any section reaches runs over eighteen decibels — and the two go opposite ways, so eleven of the twenty-four are genuine choices and thirteen are beaten on both counts by another arrangement.

Circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over

The capacitor across the upper resistor

The rejection essay said a regulator reproduces its reference times its divider's four, and that a capacitor across the lower divider resistor brings that down to one at high frequency. Measured, the loop peaks the reference's gain to 5.68 near its crossover before any capacitor is added; a nanofarad across the lower resistor raises the peak to 11.2; and the capacitor that brings it down belongs across the upper resistor, where a nanofarad keeps the gain from ever exceeding four. The same capacitor is a lead pair in the loop: 836.5 picofarads takes the phase margin from 46.5 to 90.9 degrees, and ten nanofarads, past that optimum, still holds 66 while cutting the output ripple from 60.6 millivolts to 35.4.

Lines, where a wire has a length

The corner that is three decades wide

Where the current comes back put the change in a return current's path at 106 kilohertz, from a low-frequency path assumed three track-widths wide and an inductance taken from a parallel-plate formula. Solved across a plane cut into a hundred and twenty strips, the loop's resistance equals its reactance at 1.59 kilohertz, where the current has not moved at all, and the return then gathers beneath the track over three decades — half of the way by 283 kilohertz, nine tenths by 1.42 megahertz. The single corner is a point about a quarter of the way through a band.

The ratio of the two readings, drawn where it lives. computed by solving, not by drawing. The same five-element RLC ladder at 10 kHz, read from each end, with the quotient of the two readings plotted in the complex plane. A reciprocal network sits at the point 1. One transconductance moves it along a straight ray, 1 − gm·Z, whose direction is the phase of the single branch between the source's control node and its output node and whose length is gm|Z| — 62.83 Ω for the 1 mH inductor, 120 Ω for a resistor, 72.34 Ω for 220 nF, all at 10 kHz. A mirrored pair of transconductances stays at 1 to 2.3e-15; reversing one of them runs the ratio around the unit circle to 8.9e-16, where the two readings are the same size and differ only in phase. The straight-ray law needs the two nodes joined by exactly one branch, and a second path between them takes it away by a factor rather than by a percentage.

Networks, and how a solve is checked

The reading that does care which way round

An earlier essay measured a network's departure from reciprocity and left its size as a constant — 62.8 per siemens, for that network at that frequency. It is not a constant and it is not the network's: it is 2πfL for the single inductor between the controlled source's control node and its output node, 62.832 ohms at ten kilohertz, and the ratio of the two readings is 1 − gm·Z to 8.8 parts in 10¹⁴ over ninety-nine readings. So 4.5455 millisiemens across a 220 ohm branch makes a ladder that transmits a hard zero forwards at every frequency at once, and 206.13 ohms back at ten kilohertz.

The load that takes the most power is 3.67 Ω, and the open-circuit voltage over the short-circuit current is 3.97 Ω. computed by solving, not by drawing. The terminal characteristic of a photocurrent with a junction across it, with the power along it drawn on the same axes and scaled to fill them. The most power, 80.99 W, is delivered at 17.244 V and 4.696 A, which is a load of 3.67 Ω. The incremental resistance of the source there — the negative of the characteristic's own slope — is 3.67 Ω, the same number to four figures. A straight line drawn between the two end points has a resistance of 3.97 Ω and would promise 24.81 W. The ratio of the true maximum to that promise is 3.264, and its reciprocal is the fill factor, 0.8160.

Networks, and how a solve is checked

The load a curve recommends

The maximum power theorem says to match the load to the source's internal resistance, and for a straight-line source the internal resistance, the slope and the open-circuit voltage over the short-circuit current are one number. On a photovoltaic panel they are three: the slope at the maximum is 3.6717 ohms, the load there is 3.6717, and the open-circuit voltage over the short-circuit current is 3.9709 — and a quarter of the open-circuit voltage times the short-circuit current, which is what a straight line would deliver, is 24.81 watts against the 80.99 that is there. The theorem survives with the incremental resistance in place of the internal one, and it survives only where the characteristic has a slope: on a supply whose current limit folds back, the most power is delivered at a corner.

Filters, measured not tabulated

The Q the amplifier decides

A second-order section's quality factor is set by a capacitance ratio and its pole frequency by a product of four passive values, and neither expression contains the amplifier. Build it with one that has a gain-bandwidth a hundred times the corner — the usual rule — and the Q comes out 1.97 per cent high while the pole comes out 1.97 per cent low, the same number in both directions, and the number is the designed Q divided by the ratio. A fifth-order half-decibel Chebyshev built that way has 2.1 decibels of ripple.

Filters, measured not tabulated

The offset that knows the signal

The charge a switch leaves on the capacitor it was sampling is the gate oxide capacitance times the channel area times the overdrive, and both terms in that overdrive depend on the input — one directly and one through the body effect. So the 5.67 mV a data sheet would call an offset moves by 1.86 mV across a volt of signal, which is a gain error of 0.186 per cent and only 3.4 µV of anything else. Opening the summing-node switch first divides the gain error by the amplifier's own gain, exactly, and what is left goes from twenty-nine times the sampled-noise floor to nineteen times below it.

A follower fed through 100 nH has an output resistance of -21.9 Ω. computed by solving, not by drawing. The real part of the impedance looking into the emitter, driven by a current source and read, at every frequency. At direct current it is 5.50 ohms, which is the same rₛ/(β+1) + 1/gₘ the follower's first essay computed. Between 110 MHz and 301 MHz it is negative: rπ and Cπ delay the current the transistor sources into the emitter, and past a quarter of a cycle of delay pushing the emitter up makes the device push it up as well. The dashed curve is the same follower with no inductance between the source and the base, and it never goes below zero — the sign belongs to the wire and the transistor together, and to neither alone.

Devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at

The resistance that is below zero

An emitter follower's output resistance is 5.5 Ω at direct current and −21.9 Ω at 257 MHz, and the sign is not the transistor's: with an ideal source at the base there is no negative band at all, and a hundred nanohenries of wire between the source and the base produces one from 110 to 301 MHz. A capacitance resonating inside that band is a resonator with loss of the wrong sign, so 4.7 to 100 pF on the emitter oscillates while 1 pF and 470 pF do not — a band of load capacitance with quiet ground on both sides of it.

One gain takes the equivalent resistance from 5 kΩ through infinity to negative. computed by solving, not by drawing. A 5 V source drives a node through 10 kΩ; the node also reaches 10 kΩ whose far end is held at A times the node's own voltage. The Thévenin resistance looking into that node is r1 in parallel with r2/(1 − A), which the solve returns to a part in a billion without being told: 5 kΩ at no gain, 10 kΩ at unity where r2 takes no current at all, and unbounded at A = 2.00 where the two conductances cancel. Above that it is negative. The open-circuit voltage follows it, because the short-circuit current is 500.0 µA at every gain — a short across the controlling node leaves the dependent source nothing to be controlled by — so the open-circuit voltage is simply the short-circuit current times whatever the resistance is, and reaches 150.0 volts from a five-volt source inside the range drawn.

Networks, and how a solve is checked

The resistor that is not made of the resistors

Exact outside and wrong within reduced six elements to one source and one resistor and found the resistor two ways that agreed to the last bit. Put a dependent source in the network and one of those routes stops working, because setting the sources dead kills the independent ones and leaves the dependent one where it is. On a bootstrap of two ten-kilohm resistors the Thévenin resistance runs from five kilohms through infinity to minus ten, the open-circuit voltage of a five-volt source reaches 225, and above one gain the equivalent's resistor is negative — which the netlist refuses to stamp, correctly, because a negative resistance is a controlled source and not a resistor.

$The thermal network's step response, and the sum of its own stages — 0.95 per cent apart at worst. computed by solving, not by drawing. A step of power into a three-stage thermal ladder, and the junction's rise divided by it. The solid curve is exact: the impedance is a continued fraction in s, its denominator has 3 real negative roots, and the partial-fraction expansion of Z(s)/s is a sum of that many ordinary exponentials — no march, no step size. The dashed curve is the sum every account of a thermal path writes, each stage's own resistance times 1 − exp(−t/RC) with its own local time constant, and it is an approximation because the stages load each other. What that costs is 0.950 per cent, once, at 12.9 ms — between the fastest stage's 2.4 ms and the next one's 200 ms, which is the only place two stages are moving together. It is one-sided: the sum never reads low.$ Before the steady state

Two ladders the terminals cannot tell apart

A thermal path drawn as a ladder and the same path drawn as a sum of exponentials are called different models of one object, and the difference between them has never been priced because pricing it needs an exact answer. Solved in closed form, the sum is 0.950 per cent high at worst and never low; the marched netlist is right to a part in 21,169; and the largest disagreement in the picture was 2.919 per cent that has nothing to do with heat at all, which reading the curve one sample differently removes.

The circuit does not care which node is called zero, and the matrix does. computed by solving, not by drawing. The condition number of the nodal matrix for a 12-section chain, against which of its nodes was taken as the reference. The network, its elements and its physics are identical in every case — only a label has moved — and every branch voltage and branch current comes back the same to 1.1e-13. The condition number runs from 5.25e+4 at "n6" to 1.72e+5 at "n12", a factor of 3.28, which is 0.52 decimal digits of the arithmetic's own margin.

Networks, and how a solve is checked

The node that is not in the circuit

Nodal analysis needs a node to call zero and no circuit contains one. Moving it changes every node voltage by the same amount and no branch voltage or branch current at all — to a part in ten to the fourteenth on a well-behaved chain. What it does change is the matrix: the condition number of a twelve-section chain moves by a factor of 3.3 with the reference, and on a star whose resistances span nine decades by 8.0. Measured against the same matrix solved in twice the precision, the worst reference costs four decimal digits of the answer, and it is the reference the condition number named before the error was looked at.

Two leads nobody counts cost 1995 parts per million, and two more leads remove all of it. computed by solving, not by drawing. The error in the reported strain against the resistance in each of the two excitation leads, at 1000 µε on a quarter bridge of 350 Ω excited at 10 V. With four wires the instrument takes the excitation to be the supply's voltage, so every reading is scaled by R/(R + 2r): 1995 parts per million at 0.35 Ω, 54029 at 10. Two more leads brought back from the bridge's own terminals, carrying only the instrument's input current, leave 3.5e-4 parts per million. Exciting with a current instead of a voltage does the same thing with no extra leads at all, because the lead resistance is in series with a source that does not care.

Circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over

The two leads nobody counts

The leads that are in the bridge moved a lead out of the changing arm and turned a 999-microstrain error into nothing. The two leads carrying the excitation are still there, and they scale every reading: 0.35 ohms each on a 350-ohm bridge is 1,995 parts per million, exactly −2r/(R + 2r), the same on a full bridge as on a quarter one, and drifting 0.153 microstrain over twenty kelvin — twice what the three-wire fix left behind. Two more wires brought back from the bridge's own terminals leave 0.00035 parts per million. So does exciting the bridge with a current, which needs no extra wires at all.

Three dividers in a row, and where the error actually is. computed by solving, not by drawing. Three two-resistor dividers cascaded with nothing between them. The product of their ratios is 0.1250 and the solved output is 0.076923, 38.5% low at a staircase of ×1. Decomposed stage by stage with the rest of the chain in place — and the product of those three is the answer exactly — they are 0.3846, 0.4000, 0.5000: the LAST stage is exactly its own ratio because nothing is connected to it, and the error is at the front, which is the opposite of where a probe goes. Staggering each stage's impedance up by a factor takes the departure down in proportion, fitted exponent -0.993, so a decade a stage is within 4.88% and two decades within 0.50% — which is why a chain that has to be right is built as a staircase and not out of one value repeated.

Networks, and how a solve is checked

The stage that is wrong is the far one

Three identical ten-kilohm dividers in a row give 0.076923 rather than the product of their ratios, 0.125 — 38.5 per cent low. Decomposed stage by stage with the rest of the chain in place, and the product of those three is the answer exactly, they are 0.3846, 0.4000 and 0.5000: the LAST stage is exactly its own ratio because nothing is connected to it, and the error is entirely at the front, which is the opposite end from where a probe goes. Staggering each stage's impedance up by a factor takes the departure down in proportion — fitted exponent −0.993.

At Q = 2 and a hundred times the corner, one arrangement is 1.97% out and the other 2.83%. computed by solving, not by drawing. The same second-order section designed twice — a follower with a capacitance ratio, and equal passives with the Q supplied by a closed-loop gain of 2.5000 — built with the same one-pole amplifier and swept over its gain-bandwidth, with both pole pairs recovered by rooting the determinant. The unity-gain arrangement's error is Q over the ratio: 2.00 per cent at a hundred times the corner. The equal-component arrangement's is K²/2 over the ratio, 3.13 per cent, because its amplifier is a gain-of-K stage and therefore has K times less bandwidth to spend. Below about thirty times the corner both laws fail, and the second one changes sign.

Filters, measured not tabulated

Where the Q comes from

Two second-order sections with no component value in common have the same transfer function to 1.8×10⁻¹⁰ of a decibel, and are not the same circuit. Against a slow amplifier the follower's Q error is Q over the gain-bandwidth ratio and the gain stage's is K²/2 over it — so the second is worse below Q = 3.08 and better above it. Against component tolerance the follower's worst element carries ½ and the gain stage's carries 2Q − ½, nineteen times as much at Q = 5. Neither oscillates at any gain-bandwidth at all.

The current divider, and the resistance that is not in the branch. computed by solving, not by drawing. A current source into two parallel branches, the metered one 10.0 kΩ and the other 1.00 kΩ. The metered branch takes 0.090909 of the current, which is the OTHER branch's resistance over the sum; writing the subscripts the way a voltage divider writes them gives 0.90909, a different number at every ratio but one. The dual of a voltmeter's finite resistance is an ammeter's non-zero one, and the threshold has the same shape with the roles exchanged: one per cent of error at 111.1 Ω, which is that resistance over ninety-nine to 1.7e-12%. And the headline of the loaded divider holds in the dual too — two current dividers of identical ratio read 0.04762 and 0.09090 into one hundred-ohm meter — while a perfect ammeter reads them identically.

Networks, and how a solve is checked

The branch the other resistance decides

A voltage divider's output is set by the resistance the output is taken across; a current divider's is set by the resistance the current does not go through. The dual of a voltmeter's finite resistance is an ammeter's non-zero one, and the threshold has the same shape with one word changed: one per cent at a meter resistance of R/99 where R is what the meter looks back into — and removing an ideal current source means OPENING it, so that R is the two branches in series, 11 kΩ here, not the 909 Ω of their parallel combination — a factor of twelve in the same construction on the same network.

The same 100 mΩ in the winding instead of the capacitor: 1.317 V of ripple against 1.335 V, at the same crest factor of 11.15. computed by solving, not by drawing, marched with the diodes in the netlist: a 1000 µF reservoir behind a centre-tapped rectifier, with a series resistance from 1 mΩ to 1 Ω placed either in the capacitor or in each half-winding. The crest factor is the same in both places to two parts in a thousand at every resistance — 13.34, 13.26, 13.03, 12.49, 11.15, 9.069, 6.548 — because both limit the charging current alike. The ripple is not: in the capacitor it has a minimum and rises to 1.711 V at an ohm; in the winding it falls throughout, to 1.172 V, against 1.331 V with no resistance. At an ohm the winding costs 534 mV of mean output and the capacitor 380 mV. The diode's root-mean-square current at an ohm is 0.3449 A with the resistance in the winding and 0.3484 A with it in the capacitor.

Circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over

The resistance that belongs in the winding

A reservoir capacitor's series resistance lowers the ripple to a minimum of 1.3303 V at 17 mΩ and raises it past that. The same resistance moved into the transformer's winding limits the peak current by the same amount — the crest factor agrees to two parts in a thousand at every value from a milliohm to an ohm — and the minimum is gone: the ripple falls throughout, to 1.172 V at an ohm against 1.711 V in the capacitor. The two resistances each carry a current the other does not, and that one asymmetry decides where a deliberate one should go.

What a feedback tee buys, and the single thing it charges. computed by solving, not by drawing. Two 50 kΩ resistors with a 6.250 kΩ tap give 500.0 kΩ of transimpedance, which is R₁(1 + R₂/R₃) + R₂ solved on the netlist. That expression has no term for the noise gain, and the tap sets it to 1 + R₁/R₃ = ×9.00 — against exactly one for a single resistor of any value, because at direct current the source is a capacitor. One quantity then does all three things at once. The signal and R₁'s own noise are multiplied together, so the tee buys no signal-to-noise ratio at all: 1846 against 5582 in a hertz at a nanoamp for one resistor of the same transimpedance, a factor of 3.02 which is the square root of the noise gain. The amplifier's own voltage noise and offset are multiplied where they were not before. And the phase margin RISES, from 1.8° to 15.9°, because starting the noise gain high shortens its climb to the peak — so the tee is a compensation that charges for itself in noise, and a capacitor across the feedback is the same compensation for nothing. With no tap the three effects are absent rather than small.

Feedback, and the margin

The tee that charges for its own compensation

A feedback tee makes a large transimpedance out of small resistors, and R₁(1 + R₂/R₃) + R₂ is the whole of what is usually said about it. The expression has no term for the noise gain, and the tap sets that to 1 + R₁/R₃ — nine, where a single feedback resistor of any value gives exactly one, because at direct current the source is a capacitor. One quantity then does everything: the signal and R₁'s own noise are multiplied together so the tee buys no signal-to-noise ratio at all, and the phase margin RISES from 1.8° to 15.9°.

$An all-pole filter's stopband floor: -120 dB, from 10 fF nobody drew. computed by solving, not by drawing. A butterworth 8 realised at a 20 kHz passband, drawn twice: from its poles, which fall at 48 decibels an octave for ever, and from the same netlist with 10 femtofarads of stray capacitance from its input to its last shunt node — a fraction of a picofarad between two tracks. The second stops falling at -120.0 dB at 136 kHz, because the stray bypasses every pole in front of it and what is left is its ratio to the shunt capacitance it divides against. The poles alone predict -293 dB a decade further out, which is 173 decibels lower. So an all-pole design has a stopband floor exactly as an elliptic one does — -140 dB at 1 fF, -130 dB at 3 fF, -120 dB at 10 fF, -110 dB at 30 fF, -100 dB at 100 fF, which is 20.0 decibels per decade of stray — and above that frequency a faster sample rate buys nothing at all, which is the refusal recorded for the elliptic row and not for this one.$ Where a signal becomes a number

The floor every filter has

The elliptic design was refused because its equiripple stopband is a floor and no sample rate reaches past a floor, while an all-pole design falls at six decibels an octave per pole for ever — so a faster clock is always an answer for one and never for the other. On paper. Ten femtofarads of stray capacitance from a filter's input to its output, which is a fraction of a picofarad between two tracks, puts the eighth-order Butterworth's stopband at −120 decibels from 136 kilohertz onwards where its poles predict −293. Every all-pole design has a floor, and it is a layout rather than a design.

Measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit

One voltage added to two readings

A difference amplifier across a shared return rejects somebody else's current by 54 decibels, and the number is four resistors rather than the amplifier. Two sensors referenced to the same node do better by a different mechanism entirely: the interfering voltage is one voltage on one node, so it is added to both readings identically and the difference between them has none of it — 511 microvolts in each reading against two and a half picovolts in the difference, which is 166 decibels and is exact rather than good. What is left is not a tolerance but a mismatch between the two sensors' own return paths, ten nanovolts per per cent of it.

Zeroing the dependent source too: an answer that does not depend on the gain. computed by solving, not by drawing. Two independent sources reach a node through resistors; a voltage-controlled source of gain −10 is driven from that node and fed back to it through 10 kΩ. Solved whole, the output is -25.0000 V. Solved by superposition with the dependent source LEFT IN each of the two solves it is -25.0000 V — the same number to 1.1e-16, so superposition is exact here as it is everywhere else in a linear network. Zeroing the dependent source along with each independent one gives nought volts at the output and 4.06250 V at the node, against the node's true 2.50000 V — 62.5 per cent out — because a controlled voltage source set to zero is a short circuit and the three solves are then of three different circuits. What makes it unmistakable is that the wrong answer is 4.06250 V at EVERY gain from one to three hundred: the route has deleted the only element that knows what the gain is, while the true answer moves by more than a factor across the same range.

Networks, and how a solve is checked

The source that must not be zeroed

Superposition says to zero all the sources but one, and the care usually taken over that instruction is that zeroing is not deleting — a voltage source with no voltage is a short circuit and it stays in the netlist. A dependent source needs the opposite care: it must not be zeroed at all, because it is an element whose law involves another node rather than a source the theorem is about. Zeroed, it is a short circuit, and the answer that comes back is 4.0625 volts at every gain from one to three hundred — while the true answer moves from 3.82 volts to 0.206.

An integrator's summing junction is flat at 15.7 Ω, and worst at direct current. computed by solving, not by drawing. A current is driven into the node and the voltage read. The dashed curve is the same amplifier with a 10 kΩ resistor as its feedback element: a tenth of an ohm at direct current, rising a decade per decade, 909.5 Ω at the top. With a 10 nF capacitor instead, the loop gain has no frequency in it — the amplifier's gain falls as 1/f while the feedback factor rises as f — so it is flat at 62.83 and the node is flat with it, at Rin/(1 + 2π·GBW·C·Rin) = 15.666 Ω, measured 15.668 Ω and holding to 0.50 per cent from 100 Hz to 5.31 kHz — between the amplifier's own pole and the capacitor's corner, which is where a loop gain with no frequency in it lives. Both ends are the other way round from the resistive case: at direct current the capacitor is an open circuit, there is no loop at all, and the node is 843.0 Ω — a factor of 8388 worse than the resistor's 100 mΩ. Above the amplifier's crossover the capacitor is a short and the node is 47.6 Ω against 909.5. The two cross at 1.56 kHz, which is the frequency above which an integrator is the better virtual earth of the two.

Feedback, and the margin

The shelf a capacitor makes

An inverting amplifier's summing node rises a decade per decade to the two resistors in parallel. Replace the feedback resistor with a capacitor and it does neither: an integrator's loop gain has no frequency in it, so the node is flat at Rin/(1 + 2π·GBW·C·Rin) — 15.67 ohms over four decades, to half a per cent. Both ends invert. At direct current the capacitor is an open circuit, there is no loop at all, and the node is 843 ohms against the resistor's tenth of one; above the amplifier's crossover the capacitor is a short and the node is nineteen times better.

Measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit

A star is half a millimetre long

The repair for a shared return is a star ground, and it is described as making the shared length zero. It does not: every return meets at a pad, the pad reaches the plane through a via, and a via of a quarter-milliohm and 0.35 nanohenries is worth half a millimetre of one-ounce track by its resistance and 0.35 by its inductance — two different lengths, so a via has a corner of its own at 114 kilohertz where a track's is at 79.6. What that buys is a change of law rather than a factor: a daisy chain's error grows as the square of the circuit count and a star's as the first power, so the advantage runs from sixty times at two circuits to three hundred and forty at thirty-two.

Frequency, which is the same solve

Four readings of one distance

Reactance, phase, the corner frequency and the roll-off are four readings of one complex number, and the number has a geometry. A single pole's magnitude is the pole's distance from the origin divided by its distance from the point on the imaginary axis, and the phase is minus the angle that separation subtends — agreeing with the nodal solve to a part in 10¹² over five decades. So the corner is where the distance is root two times its smallest, the roll-off is the distance becoming omega, the flat passband is the distance not yet changing, and the phase is the angle. One distance, four readings.

4 branches read with 10 Ω ammeters: one at a time every reading is low, all at once they add up and the small branches are high. computed by solving, not by drawing. A 1 A source into 4 parallel branches of 100 Ω, 1 kΩ, 10 kΩ, 100 kΩ, each read with an ammeter of 10 Ω. With one ammeter moved from branch to branch, each reading is low — by −0.989%, −0.902%, −0.099%, −0.010% — exactly r over the resistance that meter looks back into plus r, and the four readings add to 990.275 mA rather than 1000.000. With an ammeter in every branch at once the readings add to 1000.000 mA and are wrong by −0.892%, +7.939%, +8.910%, +9.008%: the meter in the largest branch pushes current out of it, and the small branches take it.

Networks, and how a solve is checked

The readings that add up and are wrong

Four branches of 100 Ω, 1 kΩ, 10 kΩ and 100 kΩ share a 1 A source. Read them one at a time with a single 10 Ω ammeter moved from branch to branch, and every reading is within one per cent of the truth, but the four add to 990.275 mA. Put a 10 Ω ammeter in every branch at once and the four readings add to 1000.000 mA exactly, satisfying Kirchhoff's current law to the last digit. Yet three of them are 7.9 to 9.0 per cent high. The check a reader would run on the readings is passed by the wrong set and failed by the right one.

A 10 ps stub under a balanced via, and the pad it has to come out of. computed by solving, not by drawing, as a cascade. The reflection from a via of 0.5 pF of pad and 1 nH of barrel on its balancing line of 44.72 Ω, met by an edge of 59 ps, four ways: with no stub, whose largest excursion is 24.4 mV; with a 10 ps open stub below its bottom pad, 90.5 mV and an area of 5 ps; with the stub's 0.224 pF taken out of both pads, 56.1 mV; and taken out of the bottom pad alone, 24.6 mV. Both trims balance the area again. Only the second restores the doublet.

Lines, where a wire has a length

The pad the stub comes out of

A via used to a middle layer leaves barrel hanging below the connection: an open stub. Under a via balanced on its √(L/C) line, a 10 ps stub is 0.224 pF of extra capacitance, 5 ps of area, and a reflection of 90.5 mV where the balanced via gave 24.4. Taking that capacitance out of the pads balances the area again whichever pad it comes from. Only one restores the doublet: out of both pads the via still reflects 56.1 mV, out of the bottom pad the stub hangs from, 24.6. The trim works for every stub whose capacitance fits inside that pad, delays up to Z·C/2 = 11.2 ps, whose quarter wave is above 22.4 GHz. A longer stub has nothing left to come out of. At 40 ps it is a notch in the transmission at 6.25 GHz.

Held one drop and 300 mV up, the cascode's floor falls from 0.832 V to 0.403 V. computed by solving, not by drawing. The output current of two cascode mirrors against their output voltage near the bottom of the supply, each divided by its own value at 5 V, on a model whose transistors saturate. The stacked mirror holds its upper device's base two drops up and stays within one per cent down to 0.832 V; the wide-swing mirror holds it one drop and 300 mV up, which leaves the lower device 0.302 V of collector-emitter voltage, and stays within one per cent down to 0.403 V. Its output resistance at 5 V is 13.2 MΩ against 7.39 MΩ, and its copy ratio 0.9758 against 0.9747.

Devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at

The drop the lower device did not need

A cascode mirror's floor is a whole base-emitter drop plus the upper device's own minimum, because the stack that biases the upper base holds it two drops above ground. The lower device needs only a few hundred millivolts. Hold the upper base one drop and 300 mV up instead, and on a model whose transistors saturate the one-per-cent floor falls from 0.832 V to 0.403 V. The output resistance does not fall with it: it rises from 7.39 to 13.2 MΩ, because the upper device's base current no longer comes out of the reference. The cost has moved into the margin itself. Below about 150 mV the lower device saturates, and at 50 mV the resistance is 0.51 MΩ and the copy ratio 0.7665.

The R–2R ladder is the chain designed for the rest of itself: every node halves exactly, in place and only in place. computed by solving, not by drawing. A current source into an 8-bit R–2R ladder, each bit's 2R returned to a virtual earth. With the rest of the ladder in place every node splits the current arriving at it exactly in half, so bit k carries 2 to the −k of the source and the step at the major carry is exactly one least significant bit. A stage alone, into a short, would send a third on rather than a half; it is right because of what is connected to it. The same ladder with every resistor equal — the three-divider chain's habit — gives 0.61803, 0.23607 and then falls away by 2.6182 a stage, which is the square of the golden ratio, 2.6180, to the fourth figure.

Networks, and how a solve is checked

The R–2R ladder, built for the rest of itself

Three equal voltage dividers in a row deliver 0.076923 of their input instead of 0.125. Their error sits in the front stage, at 0.3846, 0.4000 and 0.5000 per stage. The dual chain, three current dividers fed by a current source, gives the same three numbers to the last digit, and its repair runs the other way: each stage's resistance must fall, not rise. The R–2R ladder is the chain whose stages are wrong alone and right in place, halving exactly at every node. It still keeps its error at the front: a one per cent error in its first resistor makes an eight-bit ladder step backwards at the major carry, and the same error in its last shunt moves that step by 0.0034 LSB.

1 nF at the node lifts the inverting stage's virtual earth 1.28-fold at its resonance, the integrator's 1.09-fold. computed by solving, not by drawing. The impedance looking into the summing junction of an inverting stage (1 kΩ in, 10 kΩ feedback) and an integrator (1 kΩ in, 10 nF feedback) on the same 1 MHz amplifier, bare (dashed) and with 1 nF of sensor capacitance from the node to ground (solid). The inverting stage's node rises as an inductance, and a capacitance across an inductance is a resonance: its node reaches 909 Ω at 126 kHz, 1.28 times the bare node there. The integrator's node is a resistance, the shelf of 15.9 Ω, and a capacitance across a resistance is a corner: the loaded node is at most 1.086 times the bare one, and only where the amplifier's own output resistance is part of the loop.

Feedback, and the margin

The sensor an integrator does not see

A sensor's capacitance at an inverting stage's summing junction sits across a node that rises like an inductance, and makes a resonance: 10 nF lifts the node 2.50-fold at 39.8 kHz, the lift is the resonance's Q, and the loop's margin falls from 90° to 24.8°, and to 8.0° at 100 nF. The same capacitance at an integrator's node sits across a resistance — the shelf, 1/(2π·GBW·Cf) — and the shelf does not move, because the capacitance enters the open node and the loop gain together and cancels. With an ideal output the integrator's margin is 90.91° at every sensor from 1 pF to 100 nF. What it does see is its amplifier's output resistance: 50 Ω driving the feedback and sensor capacitors in series is a pole, worst when the two are equal, 58.3° at 10 nF, and it recovers on both sides.

A bridged-T with R₁/R₂ = 100 bottoms out at 34.2 dB, and in a loop of gain 1000 it makes a Q of 4.76. computed by solving, not by drawing. A bridged-T of two 10 nF capacitors, R₁ = 100 kΩ bridging them and R₂ = 1.00 kΩ from their junction to ground, which puts its minimum at the twin-T's 1591.5 Hz: its own transfer (dashed), bottoming at 0.0196, 34.2 dB, rather than a null; and the loop it makes as the feedback network of a gain of 1000 (solid), a peak of 48.5 with a Q of 4.760. Dotted, for scale, is the exact twin-T in a loop of gain 100: a Q of 25.2.

Filters, measured not tabulated

The residue that has only one sign

A bridged-T puts its minimum where a twin-T puts its null, with one fewer part, and its residue there is exactly 2R₂/(2R₂ + R₁): real, like the twin-T's, but positive for any values the parts can take. In a loop of gain A the two networks follow one law — the Q falls by 1 + A·ρ — and they sit on opposite sides of it. The twin-T's residue is zero with exact parts and either sign with real ones, so its loop's Q can be anything, up to oscillation. The bridged-T's loop is always damped: it rises with the gain and stops at a ceiling near √(R₁/R₂)/2, 5.00 for a ratio of 100, with no gain up to a million able to make it oscillate. What the ceiling buys is steadiness: at a Q of five, ±1% parts move the twin-T's loop by 9.1% and the bridged-T's by 2.0%.

A 100 kΩ resistor across the capacitor: the node rises a decade per decade and stops at the shelf. computed by solving, not by drawing. The summing-junction impedance of the integrator (1 kΩ in, 10 nF feedback, 1 MHz amplifier) with 100 kΩ across its capacitor (solid), beside the ideal integrator (dashed) and the 10 kΩ inverting stage (dotted). At the lowest frequencies the resistor closes a direct-current loop and the node is 0.999 Ω; it rises a decade per decade, as a resistive stage's does, and stops on the integrator's shelf of 15.9 Ω at the feedback's own corner, 1/(2π·Rp·Cf) = 159 Hz. Its highest point below a tenth of the amplifier's bandwidth is 16.3 Ω.

Feedback, and the margin

The resistor that holds the bottom of the shelf

An integrator's summing junction sits on a flat shelf, 1/(2π·GBW·Cf), over its working band, and at direct current it is nearly its whole input resistor, because a capacitor closes no loop there. A resistor across the capacitor closes one. Below the feedback's own corner the node is then an inverting stage's, rising a decade per decade from Rp/A₀, and the rise meets the shelf exactly at that corner, 1/(2π·Rp·Cf), for any resistor and any amplifier — so the node never rises above its shelf at all. That holds for every resistor below 1/(2π·f₁·Cf), the one that puts the feedback's corner on the amplifier's own pole: 1.59 MΩ here. Above it the bottom climbs past the shelf. The same 1.59 MΩ is where a millivolt of offset becomes 1.58 V at the output, and the price below it is a flat gain of Rp/Rin and arctan(1/(2π·f·Rp·Cf)) of phase.

Lines, where a wire has a length

The slot that does not separate

Cutting a slot in the plane between two tracks is the common response to coupling between their returns, and in a cross-section it looks as if it separates them. It does not, if the plane is one ground: the halves stay joined where the run ends, so at direct current both returns still spread across the whole plane and share all of its resistance — 1.0000 with a 0.4 mm slot — and above the band the slot makes the sharing worse, 4.98% against 4.03%, rising to 15.7% as the slot widens to 1.6 mm, because it takes away the copper between the tracks and pushes each return towards the other. Only a split into two grounds removes the shared resistance at DC, at the price of each loop's resistance multiplied by 2.10, and it leaves the in-band coupling 29% lower, not gone: most of two tracks' coupling at 100 MHz is their own magnetic field, which the plane's copper does not carry.

With 100% of its capacitance to its mounting, a 141.4 Ω helix is 1.37° out at 100 MHz, not 2.7 × 10⁻³°. computed by solving, not by drawing. The angle of the impedance of a 141.4 Ω resistor — √(L/C) for 8 nH of lead and 0.4 pF — against frequency: the three-element part with all 0.4 pF across its film (dashed), and a helix of 32 turns with the same totals (solid), 0% of the capacitance between adjacent turns and 100% from the turns to the part's mounting, with one end grounded. At √(L/C) the three-element part has no first-order angle and rises as the cube of frequency. The helix is not flat there: its capacitance to the mounting counts only a third, so its own flat resistance is √(3L/C) = 244.9 Ω, and at 141.4 Ω its angle is first order in frequency — 1.37° at 100 MHz against 2.7 × 10⁻³°.

Frequency, which is the same solve

The resistor that is a helix

A spiral-cut film resistor is a helix, and its capacitance is distributed along the cut rather than lumped across the ends. Where it goes decides whether the three-element model survives. Capacitance between adjacent turns bridges each turn's own piece of film, and a helix of any number of turns built that way is the three-element part exactly — to 8×10⁻¹³ at 64 turns. Capacitance from the turns to what the part is mounted over is different: its current returns through only part of the film, it weighs (4N² − 1)/(12N²) of its value, a third in the limit, and the resistance with the flattest angle moves from √(L/C) = 141.4 Ω to √(3L/C) = 245 Ω. At 141.4 Ω such a part is 1.37° out at 100 MHz where the lumped model says 0.0027°. The third is a first-order rule; above about a gigahertz the helix is a line.

A 1 kΩ bias resistance at the upper base is attenuated to 7.97 × 10⁻⁶ at low frequency and passes the lower device's noise at 15.2 MHz. computed by solving, not by drawing. The output noise current of the cascode stage at 1 mA and β = 150, driven from 1 kΩ, source by source, with the upper device's base fed through 1 kΩ instead of held at signal ground. At low frequency the resistance's noise reaches the output as 7.97 × 10⁻⁶ of the lower collector's, about 2R/(gₘrₒ²): its voltage is followed to the node between the devices and becomes a current only through the lower device's rₒ. The upper base's own shot noise, flowing in the same resistance, is 0.683%. The resistance's noise passes the lower device's at 15.2 MHz, and at 100 MHz the stage's noise figure is 6.07 dB worse than with the base held.

Devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at

The resistor the upper base is held through

A cascode's upper base is drawn at signal ground, and on a board it is held by a bias network with a resistance of its own. At low frequency that resistance's noise is harmless for the reason usually given — the upper device follows its base and turns the voltage into a current only through the lower device's output resistance — so 1 kΩ reaches the output at 8 × 10⁻⁶ of the lower device's noise. But the attenuation belongs to rₒ, and rₒ is shunted by the node's capacitance from 23.5 kHz, three hundred times below the frequency at which the upper collector's own noise stops cancelling. Unbypassed, 1 kΩ costs 6.07 dB at 100 MHz, more than 100 Ω or 100 kΩ does, and 100 pF across it makes any resistance free.

A mirror, cascoded or not, delivers two transistors' shot noise at low frequency — and cascoding it does not add a third. computed by solving, not by drawing. The output noise current of a 1 mA NPN mirror into a short, in units of one device's collector shot noise 2qI, against frequency, for a plain two-transistor mirror, the stacked cascode mirror and the wide-swing cascode with its upper base held by a separate diode at 100 µA. At 1 kHz they deliver 1.986, 1.960 and 1.965: the reference transistor's shot noise, copied, and the output transistor's own. At 100 MHz the mirror's own pole and the capacitance at the output transistor's collector have begun to take noise away, and the three read 1.681, 1.196 and 1.512.

Devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at

The base current the mirror counts twice

A current mirror delivers two transistors' shot noise — the reference device's, copied, and the output device's own — and cascoding it does not add a third: 1.960 and 1.965 of one device's noise for the stacked and wide-swing cascodes against 1.986 for the plain mirror. What the cascode adds is its upper output transistor's base noise, and there the two arrangements differ by a factor of four. In the wide-swing mirror the base current goes to a separate bias and counts once, one part in β. In the stacked mirror it goes into the reference branch, which mirrors it back into the node it left, and it counts 3.82 times at β = 150 — the same base current that took 43 per cent of that mirror's output resistance. The reference resistor's noise, meanwhile, adds almost nothing even at 1.8 V, because it takes its place in the diode's node rather than adding to it.

Frequency, which is the same solve

The circle a peak sits on

A pole pair's response at a frequency is ω₀² over the product of two distances — from the point on the imaginary axis to each pole — to a part in 10¹⁵ of the nodal solve. That turns a resonance into geometry. The peak is where a circle centred on the pair's real part and through both poles meets the axis: at Q = 2, 0.9354 of ω₀ and a height of 2.0656, found the same by a search. The quality factor is an angle, Q = 1/(2 cos θ), and a peak exists exactly when the pair is closer to the imaginary axis than to the real one — past forty-five degrees. The half-power width is where the short leg has grown by √2, twice the pair's distance from the axis. And the step, marched, rings at the pole's height and decays at its distance: a projection, not a length.

An unregulated supply's output against its load: 3.38 Ω of slope with perfect parts, 3.64 with 0.3 Ω in the winding, 3.32 with it in the capacitor. computed by solving, not by drawing, marched with the diodes in the netlist: a 17 V peak centre-tapped rectifier into 1000 µF, loaded from 200 Ω down to 25 Ω. The mean output with perfect parts falls from 15.99 V at 80 mA to 14.33 V at 573 mA, an average slope of 3.380 Ω against the textbook's 1/(4fC) = 5 Ω, drawn dashed without its diode drop. With 0.3 Ω in each half-winding the slope is 3.642 Ω; with the same 0.3 Ω in the capacitor it is 3.317 Ω. The slider is the resistance.

Circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over

The resistance a supply's regulation counts

An unregulated supply's output falls as its load rises, and the slope is its output resistance: 4.17 Ω at 80 mA and 2.80 at 575 for a thousand microfarads, below the textbook's 1/(4fC) = 5 Ω and falling, because the diodes conduct for longer as the load grows. A winding resistance adds to that slope at about its own value, 0.94 to 1.18 of it; a capacitor's adds −0.14 to −0.25. The guess that each should count by the share of the cycle it carries current in — a sixth and five sixths — is wrong in both places, and the right weighting is the mean current each carries: all of the load's through the winding, none through the capacitor.

The dual bridged-T is the same function: at a ratio of 100 both floor at 0.0196 and both loops make a Q of 4.76. computed by solving, not by drawing. The transfer of an RC bridged-T — two 10 nF capacitors bridged by 100 kΩ with 1 kΩ from their junction to ground — and of its dual — two 10 kΩ resistors bridged by 1 nF with 100 nF from their junction to ground — over two decades about 1591.5 Hz. The two curves are one to 5.7e-8 of each other, which is the solver's own conditioning: the dual's capacitor ratio plays the resistor ratio's part exactly, the residue is 2/(2 + n) for both, and in a loop of gain 1000 both make a Q of 4.760. What differs is which components carry the ratio.

Filters, measured not tabulated

The dual that is the same function

Swap a bridged-T's resistors for capacitors and its capacitors for resistors and the transfer does not change: two 10 kΩ resistors bridged by 1 nF with 100 nF to ground are the RC network's 100 kΩ and 1 kΩ around two 10 nF capacitors, to 5.7×10⁻⁸, which is the solver's own conditioning. The residue is 2/(2 + n) for both and the loop's ceiling √n/2 for both. So the choice between them is not about the response; it is about which components carry the ratio. Near the ceiling the Q moves by half the ratio's error, and a ratio of two capacitors at ±5% spreads the Q by 10.0% where two resistors at ±1% spread it by 2.1% — and drifts 2.0% over a hundred kelvin where the resistors drift 0.25.

With Rₜₕ = 10 kΩ, a tenfold range of β moves the collector current by 17.3%. computed by solving, not by drawing. The collector current of a transistor biased from a 2 V Thévenin source through 1, 10 and 100 kΩ, with 4.7 kΩ in the collector, 1 kΩ in the emitter and a 12 V supply, against its current gain from 30 to 1000, each point a Newton solve of the netlist with both junctions in the device. Dotted: one resistor from the supply to the base, 876 kΩ, sized for the same current at β = 100; it is proportional to β until it saturates. With Rₜₕ = 10 kΩ the current moves by 17.3 per cent from β = 50 to 500.

Devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at

The bias the gain does not set

A transistor's current gain varies tenfold across the parts one type number covers, and a bias network is judged by how little of that reaches the collector current. One resistor from the supply to the base passes all of it — 0.61 mA at β = 50, 1.16 at 100, and saturation from 200. The four-resistor network passes 98.5 per cent of a tenfold change with a 100 kΩ divider, 17.3 with 10 kΩ and 3.4 with 1 kΩ, and never less than the 1.78 per cent the ratio β/(β + 1) keeps however stiff the divider. Each tenfold cut in that spread costs a tenfold rise in the divider's standing current, so the design is a point on a hyperbola rather than a rule.

A 1% mismatch in the cable reads as 3.0% of full-scale displacement, at every frequency. computed by solving, not by drawing. A capacitive displacement sensor — two 10 pF plates driven at ±5 V in antiphase facing a common electrode — read by a charge amplifier through two metres of three-conductor cable with 30 pF a metre between each excitation conductor and the sense conductor. With the two cross-capacitances mismatched by 1 per cent and the sensor centred, the reading's in-phase part (solid) is 3.00 per cent of full scale at every carrier from 100 Hz to 1 MHz: the cable is a sensor capacitance, and its mismatch a displacement. The quadrature part (dashed), which the cable's resistance makes, rises with frequency and a synchronous detector rejects it. With each conductor in its own screen the cross-capacitance is gone and so is the error.

Circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over

The sensor that is the capacitance

Read a capacitive displacement sensor through the same kind of cable that limited a strain-gauge bridge's carrier, and the roles exchange. On the bridge, a 1% mismatch in the cable's capacitance was a quadrature leak that grew as the square of the carrier and could be escaped by a lower one. On a sensor of two 10 pF plates it is 3.0% of full-scale displacement, in phase, at every carrier from 100 Hz to 1 MHz — because a capacitance between an excitation conductor and the sense conductor is in parallel with the measurand and is a sensor capacitance. No detector phase separates it and no carrier escapes it; only geometry does. Screen each conductor separately and there is nothing left to mismatch.

A tee of factor 10 turns 1 µV/K of offset drift into 65.1 pA of error at −40 °C, 10 times the single resistor's. computed by solving, not by drawing. The direct-current error of a 10 MΩ photodiode amplifier calibrated at 25 °C, as the input current that would give the same output, against temperature: the part from the amplifier's offset drift of 1 µV/K (solid) and the part from its input bias current, 1 pA at 25 °C and doubling every 10 K (dashed), for a tee of factor 10 (heavy) and a single resistor (light). The offset reaches the output multiplied by the direct-current noise gain — one for the single resistor, since the source is a capacitor, and 10 for the tee — while the bias current sees the same transimpedance through both. The bias term overtakes the offset term at 85 °C with the tee and 40 °C with one resistor; below that the tee's error is the offset's, 10 times as large.

Feedback, and the margin

The drift a tee multiplies

A feedback tee reaches a large transimpedance with small resistors, and on a photodiode its price has been counted in noise: at direct current its noise gain is its own factor, where a single resistor's is one. The same noise gain multiplies the amplifier's offset. Calibrated at 25 °C and read at −40, a 10 MΩ amplifier with 1 µV/K of offset drift is 6.56 pA wrong through one resistor and 65.1 pA through a tee of factor ten — ten times, exactly, while the input bias current's error is identical through both. So the tee's drift penalty is hidden wherever the bias current dominates, which for a field-effect input doubling every 10 K is the hot end, and fully exposed at the cold end. The worst error over −40 to 85 °C comes within a factor of two of the single resistor's only above 10 MΩ for a tee of ten, and above 100 MΩ for a tee of a hundred.

Lines, where a wire has a length

The guard that is part of the return

Where a slot between two tracks makes their returns share more of the plane, adding copper instead — a grounded trace between them — makes them share less. But not much, and not at every width. At direct current a guard joined to the plane at the ends of the run is part of the same return and changes nothing: the whole plane's resistance is still shared. At 100 MHz a guard 1.4 mm wide in the 2 mm gap cuts the shared resistance from 4.03 to 2.55 per cent and the mutual inductance by half; a guard 0.1 mm wide raises the sharing to 4.44 per cent, since a thin trace beside both tracks carries both returns through its own small cross-section. The guard works by taking return current the quiet track's plane would have carried — 7 per cent of the neighbour's for a 0.6 mm guard — and it is bounded by exactly that.

The best reference is the middle of the chain below 2.37 kHz and ground above it — the node the capacitors return to. computed by solving, not by drawing. The condition number of the nodal matrix of an 8-section RC ladder — 1 kΩ in series, 10 nF and 1 MΩ to ground at each node — solved at s = jω with each of its 10 nodes in turn called zero, against frequency. Drawn: ground, the input, the middle node and the far end; the others lie between. At direct current n4 is best, near the middle as the earlier resistor chain found; from 2.37 kHz ground is — well below a single section's 15.9 kHz corner, where each capacitor's admittance is already 0.15 of a series resistor's conductance, and all 8 together about 1.2 of one.

Networks, and how a solve is checked

The reference a sweep should keep

At direct current the best node to call zero in a resistor chain is its middle. Put a capacitor to ground at each node and solve at s = jω, and the best reference moves: the middle of an eight-section RC ladder below 2.37 kHz, ground above it, where every capacitor returns. So a solver that chooses its reference once for a whole sweep is choosing wrongly somewhere, as the earlier essay suspected — but the two wrong choices are not alike. Kept for the whole sweep, ground is never worse than 1.27 times the best condition number, a tenth of a digit. The middle node, best at direct current and kept, is 143 times worse at a megahertz, 2.2 digits. A fifth-order LC filter says the same: ground within 2.18 times throughout.

Without the buffer, a second stage of 1 times the first's impedance: the top sags to 0.175 instead of 0.303, and the tail crosses at 2.00 s and overshoots to +0.010. computed by solving, not by drawing, marched and checked against the closed form to 4.5e-4: a half-second pulse through two one-second coupling stages, buffered (dashed) and with the second hung directly on the first (solid), its resistor 1 times the first's and its capacitor 1/1 of it, so that each stage alone keeps its one-second time constant. Buffered, the top sags to 0.3033 and the tail crosses zero 2.27 s after the pulse began. Unbuffered, the denominator gains the cross term R1·C2 and its poles move to −0.382 and −2.618 per second; the top sags to 0.1751, undershoots to −0.8245, crosses zero at 2.002 s and overshoots to +0.0103. The slider is the second stage's impedance relative to the first's.

Measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit

Two coupling stages without a buffer

Hang a second coupling stage directly on the first, with equal parts, and the pair's denominator gains a third time constant — the first resistor carrying the second capacitor's current. The poles spread from a double pole to −0.382 and −2.618 per time constant, a half-second pulse's top sags to 0.175 instead of the buffered pair's 0.303, and the sag rate is exactly 2 + 1/k per time constant for a second stage k times the first's impedance — the sum of the two short-circuit time constants. The tail still crosses zero, because the two zeros at the origin are untouched, and a step's lowest point is still at exactly twice its zero crossing. Then a reversal: specified by the overall corner rather than by the parts, the loaded pair sags only 1.12 times as fast as one stage and undershoots 7.6% rather than 13.5% — the buffer the cascade essay assumed makes the specified input worse.

In the stopband the series-first ladder filter is an inductance — 5.24 R₀ at three times the corner — and its dual a capacitance, 0.191 R₀: the same filter, opposite loads. computed by solving, not by drawing. The input impedance of the order-5 0.5 dB Chebyshev ladder filter realised with a series inductor first and with a shunt capacitor first, both terminated in the design resistance R₀, against frequency from a tenth of the corner to ten times it. In the passband both sit near R₀ and are nearly resistive. Above the corner they part: at 1.2 times the corner 1.33 R₀ at 89.4° against 0.749 R₀ at −89.4°; 2 times the corner 3.19 R₀ at 90.0° against 0.314 R₀ at −90.0°; 3 times the corner 5.24 R₀ at 90.0° against 0.191 R₀ at −90.0°; 5 times the corner 8.90 R₀ at 90.0° against 0.112 R₀ at −90.0°. The product of the two is R₀² at every frequency to 2e-15, which is what duality means for an input impedance. The slider is the order.

Filters, measured not tabulated

The load a filter is in its stopband

A fifth-order Chebyshev ladder filter can begin with a series inductor or, as its dual, with a shunt capacitor, and between its design resistances the two transmit identically. In the stopband they are opposite loads: at three times the corner the first is 5.24 R₀ of inductance and the second 0.191 R₀ of capacitance, their product R₀² at every frequency. That stops mattering only while the source is the design resistance. From a tenth of R₀ the shunt-first ladder filter rejects 55.9 dB at three times the corner instead of 64.0, draws 14 times the passband current at five times the corner against the series-first ladder filter's 0.24, and with a lead inductance of a tenth of R₀ over the corner's angular frequency grows a hole in its stopband — −33.8 dB where a matched source gives −54.0. A soft source does the mirror image to the series-first ladder filter. The first element has to be the one the source cannot short or open.

A gain of −1 on a part stable only at gains of ten, with 1.25 kΩ across its inputs. computed by solving, not by drawing. A 100 MHz amplifier whose second pole is at 20 MHz, wired as an inverter with two 10 kΩ resistors. Its signal gain is one at a kilohertz on every curve. Its noise gain is two with nothing across the inputs (dashed): 35.0° of margin and 4.4 dB of peaking. A resistor from the summing junction to ground raises the noise gain without touching the signal: at a noise gain of 10 the margin is 65.6°, the peak is 0.00 dB and the −3 dB point is 14.1 MHz.

Feedback, and the margin

The gain added to buy a margin

An amplifier sold as stable only at gains of ten — 100 MHz of gain–bandwidth, its second pole at 20 MHz — has 35.0° of margin and 4.4 dB of peaking as a gain of −1, because that gain closes its loop against two. A 1.25 kΩ resistor from the summing junction to ground raises the noise gain to ten without touching the signal gain, which stays one to a part in ten thousand, and the margin becomes 65.6°: still 14.1 MHz of bandwidth, 2.19 times what a unity-stable part from the same die gives at its natural gain. The price is everything the amplifier contributes, multiplied by ten instead of two — 64.0 nV/√Hz at the output against 20.5 — and a capacitor in series with the resistor buys back the low-frequency half of it and none of the wideband total.

The bootstrap reduced both ways: Thévenin's resistance diverges at A = 2, Norton's conductance crosses zero there. computed by solving, not by drawing at 121 gains, R₁ = R₂ = 10 kΩ. The Norton current is Vs/R₁, 0.500 mA, at every gain to a part in a billion (dashed, at 1), because shorting the node also shorts the bootstrap's input. The Norton conductance times R₁ is a straight line, 2 at A = 0 through zero at A = 2 to −1 at A = 3 (solid). The Thévenin resistance over R₁ is its reciprocal (faint, clipped at ±3): 0.5, 1 at A = 1, infinite at A = 2, −1 at A = 3. One network, two coordinate systems, and only one of them is singular exactly where the network is interesting.

Networks, and how a solve is checked

The reduction that stays finite

The bootstrap's Thévenin pair diverges at A = 2: its resistance and its open-circuit voltage both pass through infinity and the solve that finds them refuses. Its Norton pair does not. The short-circuit current is Vs/R₁, 0.5 mA, at every gain to a part in a billion, and the conductance is a straight line through zero. A bench that drives a current and reads a volt loses the network for every gain from 1.992 to 2.008; a bench that drives a volt and reads a current sees it to a nanosiemens throughout. A 0.1% error in the gain moves the conductance by a constant 0.1 µS and the resistance by an amount that diverges at the pole — and four hundred bootstraps built from 0.1% parts to sit on it have conductances within ±0.3 µS of zero and resistances that are a median 10.6 MΩ, 196 of them negative.

A 1 ns edge from a 10 Ω driver, a trunk, and a fork into two branches each ending in 2 pF. computed by solving, not by drawing: the network of trunk and two branches marched by its characteristics, the branch length bisected for 1% overshoot at either end. Forked at the driver, each branch may be 2.33 mm, against 1.05 mm for one track carrying both inputs at its end (dashed). Every millimetre of trunk costs more than a millimetre of branch: 0.0 mm of trunk, 2.33 mm branches; 0.2 mm of trunk, 1.89 mm branches; 0.4 mm of trunk, 1.43 mm branches; 0.6 mm of trunk, 1.01 mm branches; 0.8 mm of trunk, 0.57 mm branches; 1.0 mm of trunk, 0.11 mm branches.

Where the models stop

The track that forks

Two 2 pF inputs on one track from a 10 Ω driver with 1 ns edges may sit only 1.05 mm away inside 1% overshoot if both hang from its end. Fork the track at the driver and each branch may run 2.33 mm — more than twice as far — because two fifty-ohm branches in parallel are a 25 Ω line, half as mismatched to the driver. Every millimetre of trunk before the fork costs more than a millimetre of branch: with a millimetre of shared trunk the branches may run only 0.11 mm. Equal branches are the only good ones: a 2.2 mm branch overshoots 0.91% beside an equal partner and 1.7% beside a short one. And a star reaches further the more inputs it serves — 2.33 mm for two, 11.85 for four, where four branches in parallel make 12.5 Ω — while a daisy chain of the same inputs reaches 2.54.

One channel of a summing amplifier whose junction is shared by 8 inputs. computed by solving, not by drawing. Every input has its own 10 kΩ resistor into one junction and a gain of −1 at a kilohertz; the 10 MHz part closes its loop against a noise gain of 9. Input 1's −3 dB point is 1.17 MHz with 8 inputs, against 6.43 MHz with one: 1: 6.43 MHz, 2: 3.95 MHz, 4: 2.21 MHz, 8: 1.17 MHz, 16: 603 kHz. No other input has to be driven for this to happen; it is enough that its resistor is there.

Feedback, and the margin

The input that costs every other input

A summing amplifier gives each of its inputs a gain of −1 and closes its loop against one more than the number of inputs, so every input added divides every channel's bandwidth and multiplies the amplifier's own noise — 6.43 MHz with one input, 1.17 MHz with eight, 603 kHz with sixteen, on a 10 MHz part. Above 5.4 inputs the amplifier's 5 nV/√Hz, multiplied by n + 1, outgrows the resistors' Johnson noise, which rises only as its square root. A muted channel whose source is grounded still costs: a sixteen-input mixer is 11.5 dB louder with two channels in use than one whose unused resistors are disconnected. A channel of gain 0.1 beside one of gain 10 is 13.7 dB noisier than alone. A tree of smaller summers doubles the bandwidth and does not make the sum any quieter.

Five readings of one passive ladder network, each taken forwards and backwards. computed by solving, not by drawing; every reading built as its own netlist, never converted from another. Transimpedance (current in, open-circuit voltage out), transadmittance (voltage in, short-circuit current out) and the reverse voltage gain against minus the forward current gain all give a ratio of one, to 1.0e-13. The voltage gain forwards against backwards does not: 1.000 at 100 Hz, 2.129 at 1 MHz. Nor does the current gain.

Networks, and how a solve is checked

The readings that come back the same

Reciprocity is usually stated as 'swap the source and the meter and the reading is unchanged', and that is true of some readings and false of others. On one passive ladder network the transimpedance, the transadmittance, and the reverse voltage gain against the forward current gain each come back the same to 10⁻¹³, while the voltage gain forwards and backwards differ by 13.1 times at 82.5 kHz — exactly z₂₂/z₁₁. A 600-to-50-ohm pad has voltage gains of 0.0426 and 0.511 and one power gain both ways. A controlled source breaks all three reciprocal pairs by the same factor.

A terminated ladder network's output noise three ways: one solve per resistor, one solve from the output, and 4kT·Re{Z}. computed by solving, not by drawing, at 290 K. The line is 4kT·Re{Zout}. The dots sum each resistor's 4kT/R through its own transfer to the output, one solve per resistor. The rings get the same transfers from a single solve with an ampere injected at the output — reciprocity — and agree to 4.4e-16; the sum agrees with Nyquist's expression to 4.4e-16. 4.60 nV/√Hz at 100 Hz, 3.82 at 1 MHz.

Networks, and how a solve is checked

The resistance colder than the room

In a passive network the noise at a port is 4kT times the real part of its impedance, and reciprocity is why: the transfer from each resistor to the port equals the transfer from the port to that resistor, so one solve from the output gives every resistor's share and the shares add to Nyquist's expression, here to 4.4 × 10⁻¹⁶. With gain in the network both fail. A 50-ohm termination made by feedback around an amplifier of gain A presents 50.000 Ω and has the noise of a 50-ohm resistor at 290/(1 + A) kelvin — 2.90 K at a gain of 99 — but only where the amplifier still has its gain.

Measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit

The cure that needs one current

Balancing the resistances an amplifier's inputs look into removes whatever its two input currents have in common and leaves their difference. On a plain bipolar input the two are one current at two pins, correlated at 0.991, and the cure is worth ten. On an input whose bias current has been cancelled they are two residues of either sign, correlated at 0.10, and over 400 seeded parts the cure makes the error 38 per cent worse. It is worth 1/√(2(1 − ρ)) for a zero-mean current, nothing at ρ = ½, and in general exactly the input current over the offset current.

The common-emitter stage from a 100 Ω source: the solved response against the Miller estimate. computed by solving, not by drawing. The stage of 1 mA, 5 kΩ load, Cπ 20 pF and Cμ 2 pF has a gain from base to collector of 182.0. From 100 Ω the network's bandwidth is 3.41 MHz; the Miller estimate — Cμ moved to the input, multiplied by one plus the gain — says 4.23 MHz, 1.24 times it. The estimate has one pole, at the input; the network has two, and from a low source the second is the one that sets the bandwidth.

Devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at

The node the bandwidth belongs to

The Miller estimate puts a common-emitter stage's bandwidth at its input node, and whether that is right depends on the source. From 10 kΩ it is within 1% at every load from a gain of 19 to 1,190; from 100 Ω it is 24% optimistic and from 10 Ω 3.41 times, because the input node has become fast and the output node sets the bandwidth. The stage's two poles split from 92 to 2,993 times apart as the source rises. A load capacitance the estimate cannot see takes the bandwidth from 12.1 MHz to 1.49 MHz from 10 Ω and moves it 6% from 100 kΩ. And the multiplier is the gain from base to collector, 182 — not the 144.7 from the source.

A zero on the right at 1.00 kHz: the straight lines report 46.47° of margin, and the loop has 18.19°. computed by solving, not by drawing, the closed form held to the netlist — an inverting differentiator added back to its input makes the zero — at three frequencies and to the closed loop's poles. An integrator with a zero in the right half-plane at 1.00 kHz, the integrator set so that the straight lines cross unity at 950 Hz. The magnitude, and so the lines, are those of a zero on the left; the phase falls by the zero's angle where the left zero's would rise (dashed). The loop crosses at 3.04 kHz. Read at the lines' crossing with the loop's own phase the margin is 46.47°, and 133.53° with the phase the magnitude implies; at the loop's own crossing it is 18.19°.

Frequency, which is the same solve

The zero the lines put on the wrong side

A zero in the right half-plane has exactly the magnitude of its mirror on the left, so it has exactly the same straight lines, and nothing drawn from a magnitude can say which side it is on. The phase can: it falls where the mirror's rises. An integrator and such a zero, read off its lines, reports 90° − atan x of margin on a loop that has acos x, where x is where the lines cross as a fraction of the zero — so the lines say 45° of a loop with none. Behind one real pole the over-report reaches 37.6° on a loop of 2.1° when the zero sits below the pole, and vanishes when it sits above it: the reading is unsafe exactly when the zero comes first.

The harmonics of one phase of three balanced rectifier loads conducting 60°, each sorted into the sequence its three phasors form. computed by solving, not by drawing: each harmonic of the three phases decomposed into zero, positive and negative sequence. Every one is a single sequence to the arithmetic's floor: h1 positive, h3 zero, h5 negative, h7 positive, h9 zero, h11 negative, h13 positive, h15 zero. A balanced set shifts harmonic h by h × 120° between phases, so the third and its multiples are not shifted at all — zero sequence — the seventh is shifted as the fundamental is, and the fifth the other way round. Relative to the fundamental, the zero-sequence harmonics together are 72.5%, the negative 24.1% and the positive 16.7%.

Power, and the part that does no work

The sequence a harmonic belongs to

Symmetrical components are defined on phasors, so they describe one frequency, and a rectifier load's current has many. Taken harmonic by harmonic, three balanced loads give a single sequence at every harmonic, to the arithmetic's floor: the third and its multiples zero sequence, the seventh, thirteenth and nineteenth positive, the fifth, eleventh and seventeenth negative — because harmonic h is shifted h × 120° between phases. The sequence decides where each harmonic can go. Connected line to line, the loads put no triplen in a line at all: 3.32 A of them circulates round the delta and never leaves it. Fed through a delta–wye transformer beside a second group, the fifth and seventh cancel in the supply and the eleventh and thirteenth remain, because the transformer turns the two sequences opposite ways.

A cascode is 15.9 times wider than the plain stage from 100 kΩ and 1.30 times from 10 Ω, with a 5 kΩ load. computed by solving, not by drawing, each bandwidth bisected on the solved magnitude. The common-emitter stage of 1 mA, Cπ 20 pF and Cμ 2 pF into 5 kΩ, alone and with a second device stacked on its collector, across four decades of source resistance. The plain stage falls from 12.1 MHz to 110 kHz as its Miller-multiplied input node slows. The cascode runs from 15.8 MHz, where its output node sets the bandwidth — Cμ2 against 5 kΩ, 15.9 MHz — to 1.75 MHz, where its input node does: rπ in parallel with the source, against Cπ and twice Cμ, 1.78 MHz. Neither single-node figure is ever below the stage's own bandwidth. The faint line is the cascode with the upper device's own Cπ left out of the middle node, and it is never below the solid one and at most 0.74% above it.

Devices, and the amplitude they stop being linear at

The nodes a cascode hands the bandwidth to

A cascode is said to remove the Miller effect, and into 5 kΩ it does: from a 100 kΩ source it is 15.9 times wider than the plain stage. From 10 Ω it is 1.30 times wider, because there the bandwidth was never the input's — it belongs to the output node, Cμ2 against the load, 10.0 ns from every source. From a high source it belongs to the input, which is now rπ against Cπ and twice Cμ rather than against a multiplied Cμ, 74.7 ns of Cπ beside 15.4 of Cμ. The node the cascode adds holds 0.545 ns and moves the bandwidth less than one per cent. Its three poles cross rather than split, the sum of time constants is worst — 24% low — at the source where two nodes are equally slow, and the removal is not unconditional: the middle node's gain is 1.01 at a 1 kΩ load, 12.3 at 1 MΩ, and above 3.11 MΩ the cascode is narrower than the stage it replaced.

One loop, cut at its output wire with 160 nF on it: the voltage injection crosses unity twice, the current injection reads 57 dB too much at low frequency, and together they are the loop gain. computed by solving, not by drawing. A three-pole amplifier closed for a gain of a hundred, with 100 Ω of output resistance and 160 nF of load. The loop gain read at the controlled source's own input, which draws no current (solid); read by a voltage injected in series with the output wire (dashed); and by a current injected into the same wire (dotted). The true loop crosses unity at 5.31 kHz with 8.9° of margin. The voltage reading first crosses at 5.04 kHz with 15.1°, and rises through it again at 10.6 kHz, because above 9.95 kHz the load is a lower impedance than the source. The current reading crosses at 5.82 kHz with 19.8°. Combined through 1/(1 + T) = 1/(1 + Tv) + 1/(1 + Ti) (dots), the two give the controlled source's reading to 3e-9 at every frequency.

Feedback, and the margin

Two wrong readings and one loop gain

A loop gain measured on a bench is measured at a wire, and a wire has an impedance on each side. Cut an amplifier's output with 100 Ω behind it and 160 nF ahead, inject a voltage in series, and the reading is the loop gain plus (1 + T)·Zs/Zl — 15.1° of margin where the loop has 8.9°, and a second unity crossing at 10.6 kHz that the loop does not have. Inject a current into the same wire and the error is (1 + T)·Zl/Zs: 19.8°, and 57 dB too much loop gain at low frequency. The two errors are reciprocal, so the readings combine exactly: 1/(1 + T) = 1/(1 + Tv) + 1/(1 + Ti) returns the loop gain at the controlled source's own input to a few parts in a billion, at every frequency and every load.

The bank's impedance peaks at 0.966 Ω at 7.12 MHz; a one-ampere load step moves the supply by 132.4 mV. computed by solving, not by drawing. The bulk-and-ceramic pair of the decoupling essays — 10 µF with 5 mΩ and 5 nH, 100 nF with 30 mΩ and 1 nH — standing on a regulator of 2 mΩ and 20 nH, and the voltage at the bank when the load's current steps by one ampere, from the impedance's own step response by residues (solid). The impedance this bank presents peaks at 0.966 Ω at 7.12 MHz (upper line), the parallel resonance of the bulk part's inductance with the ceramic. The step rings at that frequency and its largest swing is 132.4 mV, 31.3 ns after the step — about a quarter period — which is 14% of the peak and 59% of the resonance's characteristic impedance √(L/C) = 0.224 Ω (lower line).

Power, and the part that does no work

The peak a load step does not see

A decoupling bank is specified by its impedance against frequency, and the number that fails a target is the anti-resonance peak — 0.966 Ω at 7.12 MHz for the bulk-and-ceramic pair standing on a regulator. A load that steps by one ampere moves that supply by 132 mV, 14% of what the peak suggests: a step rings the resonance once, and its first swing is set by the resonance's characteristic impedance √(L/C) = 0.224 Ω, not by its Q. The peak is the voltage per ampere of a load that sits at the resonance; switched at 7.12 MHz the same load builds over six cycles to ±611 mV, the peak times the current's fundamental. So damping, the cure for the peak, is a cure for that load only: sixteen times the ESR cuts the peak 8.9-fold and leaves a step's swing between 120 and 155 mV. What decides a step is its edge — 132 mV for anything faster than a few nanoseconds, 28 mV for a microsecond.

A 150 nH ground lead on a ten-to-one probe, at a 50 Ω source: the screen shows 49.4% of overshoot ringing at 121 MHz on an edge that has none. computed by solving, not by drawing, twice. A 1 V step from a 50 Ω source, watched through a ten-to-one probe with 11.5 pF at its tip, its ground returned through 150 nH of lead — about fifteen centimetres — and the scope reading the tip against the lead's end (solid, from residues; dots, a trapezoidal march, peak 1.4942). The same probe with its ground at the circuit's ground (dashed). The node itself steps cleanly. With the lead the tip capacitance and the lead inductance resonate at 1/(2π√(LC)) = 121 MHz, damped only by the source: ζ = (Rs/2)√(C/L) = 0.219, and the display overshoots by 49.4%.

Measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit

The ring the ground lead adds

Every earlier measurement of a probe returned it to the circuit's ground directly. A real ten-to-one probe returns through fifteen centimetres of clip lead, about 150 nH, and its 11.5 pF tip and that lead are a series resonance at 121 MHz across the node being watched. The only damping it has is the source's own resistance, ζ = (Rs/2)·√(C/L), so the screen shows 49.4% of overshoot on a clean step from 50 Ω, 87.1% from 10 Ω, and none above 228 Ω — the stiffer the node, the worse the picture. Solved by residues and by a march of the netlist, the overshoot follows the second-order law at every source. A spring tip's 5 nH rings at 664 MHz and not at all from 50 Ω; a 150 Ω resistor in series with the tip brings a clip lead under 2% at the price of a 3.65 ns rise.

$A stray of a tenth of the sampling capacitor moves a one-plate integrator's coefficient by 9.85%; switched at both plates, by 0.14%, nearly all of it the amplifier's own gain error. computed by solving, not by drawing. A switched-capacitor integrator with a 1 pF sampling capacitor, 4 pF of feedback and 0.5 pF at the amplifier's input, and a stray capacitance to ground at the sampling capacitor's switched plate; the error of the per-cycle coefficient against Cs/Cf, against the stray as a fraction of Cs. With one plate switched (solid) the stray is charged to the input and dumped with the capacitor, so it is part of the capacitor: the error is the stray's fraction less the amplifier's small gain error, 9.85% at a tenth. With both plates switched (dashed, A = 1000; dotted, A = 10⁵) the plate that meets the summing node moves between ground and −Vo/A, so the stray's charge carries a factor 1/A: its sensitivity falls from 1/Cf to Cs/(A·Cf²), 4000 times smaller, and what is left, 0.14%, is the amplifier's gain error (1 + (Cx + Cs)/Cf)/A, which the one-plate arrangement has as well.$ Filters, measured not tabulated

The capacitance at the switched plate

A switched-capacitor filter's corner is a ratio of two capacitors, and every plate on a chip has a capacitance to the substrate that is on no schematic. Switch one plate of the sampling capacitor and that stray is charged to the input and dumped with it: a stray a tenth of the capacitor is a tenth of error, and a bottom plate's fifteen per cent is fifteen per cent at any size. Switch both plates and integrate into a virtual ground and the stray at the plate that meets the summing node moves only between ground and −Vₒᵤₜ/A — its sensitivity falls from 1/Cf to Cs/(A·Cf²), four thousand times less at a gain of a thousand, and what is left is the amplifier's own gain error, 0.14%. The stray has not vanished: it has moved out of the coefficient that sets the corner and into the integrator's leak, where the direct-current gain becomes A·Cs/(Cs + Cp).

A megohm part with one picofarad to its mounting, heavier at one end: 0.433 pF with that end driven and 0.233 pF turned round, 1.56° against 0.84° at 10 kHz. computed by solving, not by drawing: the angle of the impedance of a 1 MΩ resistor as 200 sections, with 1 pF in total from its film to its mounting tapered as c(x) ∝ 1 + a(1 − 2x), a = 0.6, read at the terminal with the far end grounded. Driving the end nearer the mounting (solid) it presents 0.433 pF and 1.56° at 10 kHz; turned round (dashed), 0.233 pF and 0.84°. The first-order weight is ∫c(x)(1 − x)²dx, which is C(1/3 + a/6) and C(1/3 − a/6). The part's total capacitance has not changed, nor has its resistance, and neither of the readings is that total.

Frequency, which is the same solve

The resistor turned round

A resistor's stray capacitance is usually drawn as one capacitor across its ends, and a stray to the part's mounting is not one number. Read at the terminal with the far end grounded it is weighted by the square of the distance from ground, so a uniform stray counts as a third of itself, and turned round a part with a tapered stray reads differently: 0.433 pF one way and 0.233 pF the other from one picofarad in all. In the current through the part the weight is x(1 − x), a sixth, and the current reaching the far end is 3 dB down at ωRC = 9.18 rather than at one. Two readings of one part separate the total from the taper, and a distributed stray's phase never reaches a capacitor's: it stops at 45 degrees.

A ten-to-one divider with 15 pF of its arm behind a kilohm, stepped through 1 kΩ: one trimmer overshoots 0.00936% where an ideal source shows 13.2%, and the second branch that was exact no longer settles first. computed by solving, not by drawing: the step of the divider of the earlier essay, 9 MΩ and a trimmer over 1 MΩ with 100 pF direct and 15 pF behind a kilohm, through a source resistance of 1 kΩ, by residues. One trimmer at its calibrator setting (solid) overshoots 0.00936%, and the second branch that made the arm a scaled copy (dashed) rises without overshoot on the source's own lag. An ideal source (dotted) shows a 13.2% hook with one trimmer and nothing with two. A source resistance charges the input capacitance, 11.5 pF, so its lag and the hook act on one edge, and when they are comparable the hook's excess goes into shortening the lag.

Measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit

The source the hook hides behind

A compensated divider with a late branch in its lower arm overshoots 13.2 per cent on an ideal step, and every measurement of that hook has been made from a source with no resistance. Through a real source the input capacitance charges first, and the hook and the source's lag act on the same edge. The overshoot is 10.5 per cent from 50 Ω, 4.13 from 300 Ω and gone by a kilohm, where the source's lag equals the hook's. The excess has not gone away: it is in the edge, which the screen shows 15 per cent faster than the source and the probe's capacitance allow. And the second branch that made the divider exact only makes its ratio exact, so from a kilohm the exact divider settles in 65.6 ns and the one with the hook in 44.

A reference 0° behind the excitation at 20 kHz, after a calibration at +1000 µε: matched, the worst error is 5.79 ppm; with a tenth of a per cent of screen mismatch, 0.607%. computed by solving, not by drawing: the error of a synchronous reading of a 350 Ω quarter bridge through ten metres of screened pair, against the strain read, with the reference 0° from the excitation at the bridge and a shunt calibration at +1000 µε through the same reference, for a matched screen (solid) and for 0.01 and 0.1 per cent of mismatch. The calibration takes out cos(φ − θ), because it multiplies the signal at every strain. It cannot take out a voltage that does not scale with the strain, and the mismatch's leak is such a voltage: a hyperbola through zero at the calibration strain. Worst over ±2000 µε: 0%: 5.79 ppm, 0.01%: 606 ppm, 0.1%: 0.607%.

Circuits that do a job, and the range they do it over

The reference that should be late

A carrier amplifier's reference is taken from the excitation because that is what the output is meant to be in phase with, and nothing says that is where it belongs. A screen mismatch's leak arrives late by the common-mode node's lag and the difference's together, 525 ns on ten metres of pair and a 350 Ω bridge, so a reference on the excitation reads sin 3.7° of it at 20 kHz: 0.607 per cent of error at a tenth of a per cent of mismatch, and 72.6 parts per million with the reference 3.7° late. The null is a delay rather than a phase and does not move with the mismatch, and a delayed reference allows about five times the carrier on any mismatched screen. How exactly it must be held narrows as mismatch times carrier.

What a simulator's small conductance reports: at 10⁻¹² S a resistive divider reads 5 V, 1 µA into a capacitor reads 1 MV with a residual at machine precision, and the slope says which of those belongs to the circuit. computed by solving, not by drawing on the nodal matrix at direct current, with a conductance g from each node to ground. A divider of two 1 kΩ on 10 V (flat, 5 V at every g); 1 µA into a capacitor, which the solver refuses without g and which reads I/g with it (slope −1, 1 MV at 10⁻¹² S, 100 mV at 10⁻⁵ S); a biased stage behind a coupling capacitor, 100 mV (flat until g is comparable with its 1 MΩ); and two capacitors in series on 10 V, whose node reads 0 mV at every g, since a conductance to ground is the only thing at that node and it has nothing to divide against. Every one of these passes Kirchhoff's law with g included to machine precision. The residual has no way to tell these answers apart.

Networks, and how a solve is checked

The conductance added so it would invert

A solver that refuses a node with no direct-current path can be made to answer by adding a tiny conductance from every node to ground, which is what a circuit simulator does. Kirchhoff's law then holds to machine precision, and the numbers are of three kinds. A real divider's node is exact at any conductance. 1 µA into a capacitor reads a megavolt at 10⁻¹² S, ten times that at 10⁻¹³, and is purely the reciprocal of what was added. A floating 9 V source reads ±4.5 V, a centre tap nobody built, and follows the ratio of two conductances that do not exist. Scaling the conductance finds the first kind and misses the third. One test current per node finds them all, because a node held only by what was added has a resistance to ground near one over it.

All themes