Generator

Matching 50 Ω to 200 Ω with 51.7 mm of 100.0 Ω line

computed by solving, not by drawing at 261 frequencies. The reflection at the design frequency is 4.6e-17 — nothing, to the arithmetic — against 0.600 for the bare junction, which throws 36% of the power back. It stays under 0.1 from 0.914 to 1.086 of that frequency, a band of 17.1%.
Matching 50 Ω to 200 Ω with 51.7 mm of 100.0 Ω linecomputed by solving, not by drawing at 261 frequencies. The reflection at the design frequency is 4.6e-17 — nothing, to the arithmetic — against 0.600 for the bare junction, which throws 36% of the power back. It stays under 0.1 from 0.914 to 1.086 of that frequency, a band of 17.1%.00.2000.4000.6000.8000.50011.50frequency ÷ the frequency it was cut forreflection |Γ|the bare junction: 0.600|Γ| = 0.1, or 20.0 dB return lossexact here only17.1% of a bandsolved, then checked — the band scanned, not approximatedexact at one frequency, 17% of band

Drawn above at its default parameters, which is almost never how an essay calls it. A placement states the numbers that essay is arguing about, so the figure a reader meets is about that argument rather than about the generator — 98% of the placements on this site pass one, and the phase that raised that number from 12% found eight captions describing a figure the page was not showing.

At those defaults the edge it states is exact at one frequency, 17% of band — the right-hand slot of the caption strip, which on this site is never used for anything else, and which is read back out of the drawing above rather than out of the code that wrote it. It belongs to Lines, where a wire has a length, which is to say a change to it is a change to lib/figures/lines.js. It takes a slider on load impedance (ohms) with 7 settings, and every one of them has passed the same assertions as the frame above — a figure whose circuit stops doing what its caption says at any setting stops the build.

Called by 4 essays

which is the blast radius of changing it

A quarter wave, and the path the current takes back

A line a quarter of a wavelength long, whose impedance is the geometric mean of the two it joins, matches them exactly — reflecting 5×10⁻¹⁷ of what arrives, which is the arithmetic's floor. At one frequency. Seventeen per cent either side of it the reflection is back to a tenth, and that band is the whole of what the technique is worth.

Lines, where a wire has a length

Several sections, and the band they buy

A quarter-wave transformer is exact at one frequency, and a 4:1 transformation holds |Γ| under 0.1 over 17.1% of it. Several sections whose reflections cancel over a band take that to 47.7, 67.9, 82.1 and 92.6% — which is filter design with the reflection as the shaped quantity. An equal-ripple design found by minimax search buys a further 35 to 46% at the same worst reflection, and its ripples come out level to four decimals.

Lines, where a wire has a length

The receiver that is a branch

A lattice diagram has two ends, and an interior receiver is not a point on a net — it is a short piece of track leading off it to a pin, open at the far end. Three lines of equal impedance meeting at a junction present each other with half the impedance, so a wave arriving is reflected by exactly minus a third and two thirds goes on: the far end receives two thirds of the swing and sits there for twice the stub's own delay, whatever the net is terminated with and wherever on it the branch is.

Lines, where a wire has a length

The number that was wrong

The rung below printed 97.3 per cent of band for a five-section transformer where the answer is 134, said in its own text that the figure was wrong, and blamed a search that had converged to eight digits. The search was fine. The objective was the worst of a grid rather than the worst of a band, the band was then measured by bisecting a function that crosses its threshold five times, and the assertion guarding all of it passed — because 97.3 is still more than 92.6.

Lines, where a wire has a length

Every generator