How much faster an instrument must be for 10% of inflation
Drawn above at its default parameters, which is almost never how an essay calls it. A placement states the numbers that essay is arguing about, so the figure a reader meets is about that argument rather than about the generator — 98% of the placements on this site pass one, and the phase that raised that number from 12% found eight captions describing a figure the page was not showing.
At those defaults the edge it states is 2.79× to 6.87× against the rule's 2.18× — the right-hand slot
of the caption strip, which on this site is never used for anything else, and which is read
back out of the drawing above rather than out of the code that wrote it.
It belongs to Measurement, which is a circuit on a circuit, which is to say a change to it is a
change to lib/figures/instruments.js.
It takes a slider on inflation accepted with 6 settings,
and every one of them has passed the same assertions as the frame above — a figure whose
circuit stops doing what its caption says at any setting stops the build.
Called by 2 essays
which is the blast radius of changing it
The probe is part of the circuit
A one-to-one oscilloscope probe on a two-kilohm source gives a reading that is one per cent wrong at 6.8 kHz. Not because the instrument is inaccurate — it is reading correctly — but because the hundred and fifteen picofarads at the end of the cable are across the node, and above that frequency the trace on the screen is a picture of a circuit that only exists while the probe is attached.
The instrument's own rise time
Rise times add in quadrature, so ten per cent of inflation needs an instrument 2.18 times faster than the edge. That constant contains no instrument. Measured on the solved network it is 2.79 for a one-pole front end, 3.97 for two, 4.87 for three and 5.62 for four — the rule is optimistic at every pole count, which is the wrong direction for a rule of thumb to err in.