Generator

The one number Dowell gets right, and the one it gets wrong the other way

computed by solving, not by drawing. Dowell's expression has no window in it: the same layer count and the same foil thickness give 16.382 whatever share of the bobbin the copper covers, which is the flat line. The solved ratio falls to 9.001 at 25 per cent fill — the closed form is 82 per cent high — while the actual loss goes the other way, from 0.2322 to 0.5278 watts per metre, because the same current is in less copper. A designer reading the ratio alone reads an improvement. The loss is least at 92 per cent fill and not at a hundred, by 1.8 per cent — over that narrow range the ratio falls faster than the direct-current resistance rises, and past it the trade reverses.
The one number Dowell gets right, and the one it gets wrong the other waycomputed by solving, not by drawing. Dowell's expression has no window in it: the same layer count and the same foil thickness give 16.382 whatever share of the bobbin the copper covers, which is the flat line. The solved ratio falls to 9.001 at 25 per cent fill — the closed form is 82 per cent high — while the actual loss goes the other way, from 0.2322 to 0.5278 watts per metre, because the same current is in less copper. A designer reading the ratio alone reads an improvement. The loss is least at 92 per cent fill and not at a hundred, by 1.8 per cent — over that narrow range the ratio falls faster than the direct-current resistance rises, and past it the trade reverses.0510150.2000.4000.6000.8001share of the window height the copper fillsRac/Rdc, and the loss in watts per metre × 20Dowell: no window in itsolvedleast loss at 92%loss × 20Dowell, any fill16.382solved at 100%16.202solved at 25%9.001ratio overstated by82%loss at 100%, W/m0.2322least loss, at 92%0.2280loss at 25%, W/m0.5278solved, then checked — the ratio falls and the loss risesthe closed form is 82% high at 25% fill

Drawn above at its default parameters, which is almost never how an essay calls it. A placement states the numbers that essay is arguing about, so the figure a reader meets is about that argument rather than about the generator — 98% of the placements on this site pass one, and the phase that raised that number from 12% found eight captions describing a figure the page was not showing.

At those defaults the edge it states is the closed form is 82% high at 25% fill — the right-hand slot of the caption strip, which on this site is never used for anything else, and which is read back out of the drawing above rather than out of the code that wrote it. It belongs to Two windings, and the band between them, which is to say a change to it is a change to lib/figures/magnetics.js. It takes a slider on layers in the portion with 4 settings, and every one of them has passed the same assertions as the frame above — a figure whose circuit stops doing what its caption says at any setting stops the build.

Called by 6 essays

which is the blast radius of changing it

The assumption that is a geometry

Every alternating-resistance number this collection has computed for a winding rests on one sentence — the field is parallel to the layers everywhere — and the sentence has never been tested, because testing it needs a field. Solved as one, a portion of foils that fills its window returns Dowell's expression to 0.155 per cent; the same copper filling a quarter of it returns 9.00 against the expression's 16.38, and dissipates 0.528 watts a metre against 0.232. The ratio falls by 45 per cent and the loss more than doubles.

Two windings, and the band between them

The turns nearest the gap

A gapped inductor's flux does not turn a corner into the iron on its way out of the gap; it bulges into the window and crosses the copper at right angles to the layers. Four tenths of a millimetre from a one-millimetre gap, the worst turn of an eight-turn winding dissipates 37.5 times its direct-current loss and the winding as a whole 14.1 times. Move the same winding three millimetres further out and those become 2.9 and 2.4 — and the distance that governs it is 0.60 millimetres, which is not the gap length and does not scale with it.

Two windings, and the band between them

The wire that is not a foil

Almost no winding is made of foil, and the closed form for a winding's alternating-current resistance is about foils. The bridge between them is a substitution — squeeze the layer's conductors together, spread the result back across the breadth, divide the conductivity by the porosity — and it replaces a two-dimensional geometry with a one-dimensional one. Solved as a field it is exact where it must be, at a porosity of one, and 7.2 per cent high at a porosity of 0.40. It errs on the safe side, which is the half of the answer nobody could have assumed.

Two windings, and the band between them

The inductance that is a shape

Leakage inductance is the one transformer parameter that belongs to the geometry rather than to the material: twice the magnetic energy in the window under equal and opposite ampere-turns, divided by the square of the current. Solved as a field it is 3.086 microhenries a metre against a closed form's 3.128 when the copper fills the window, and 4.608 against 6.255 when it fills half of it. Interleaving is worth 3.11 times and not the four it is quoted as, and the missing 0.89 is the insulation nobody puts in the formula.

Two windings, and the band between them

The optimum that does not move

A foil winding has a best thickness — past it, more copper is more resistance — and at that thickness the alternating-current resistance is four thirds of the direct-current resistance, whatever the layer count. Both of those are one-dimensional results, and this ladder has spent three rungs finding that the one-dimensional picture is 82 per cent wrong about the resistance ratio. Solved as a field, the optimum drifts by 8.3 per cent between a full window and a quarter-full one, and four thirds becomes 1.34, 1.35, 1.41. The trade barely moves while everything it is made of moves a great deal.

Two windings, and the band between them

Interleaving is a choice, not an improvement

Splitting a transformer's windings into six sections divides its leakage inductance by 21.4 and multiplies its winding-to-winding capacitance by 11.0. The product of the two — which is what sets the frequency the part stops being a transformer at — moves by 1.94, and the resonance it decides goes from 1.804 to 2.515 megahertz for all that work. What interleaving really changes is the winding's characteristic impedance, 95.2 ohms down to 6.2, and nobody quotes it.

Two windings, and the band between them

Every generator