Circuit Response
every model has an edge, and the figure carries it
Concept

Validity region — where it appears

The set of operating points at which a model holds to a stated accuracy, drawn over every variable the model has rather than one at a time. It is bounded by a different mechanism on each side, and its corner sits inside where the one-variable specifications cross, because at the corner every mechanism is contributing at once.

Named by 9 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The ideal amplifier is good to 1% over a region, and its corner is 21% inside the specifications. computed by solving, not by drawing. The 1 per cent contour of the ideal-amplifier model for a non-inverting stage of gain 2 built from a 10 MHz part, drawn over frequency and output amplitude at once. Each point is bisected on a marched circuit: the error is the root-mean-square difference between the marched output and 2 times the input, which counts the gain that is low, the phase that is late and the peak that is flat. Three mechanisms bound the region — finite gain–bandwidth on the left, the input pair's slew rate on the diagonal, and the rails at 12.19 V along the top. The two dashed lines are the numbers a data sheet gives: a small-signal edge at 48.8 kHz with no amplitude in it, and a full-power bandwidth of slew rate over 2πV̂ with no gain–bandwidth in it. They cross at 10.60 V and 48.8 kHz; the measured contour passes 38.5 kHz at that amplitude, which is 0.790 of it.

The edge that is a region

Every boundary drawn so far in this subject is a number on one axis, and the figure that gathers four of them admits in its own caption that the fifth is an amplitude and cannot go there. Drawn on both axes at once, the ideal amplifier's one per cent boundary is a region with three sides and a corner — and the corner sits at 38.5 kilohertz where the two numbers a data sheet quotes cross at 48.8, because the two mechanisms are lags on the same waveform and add as magnitudes rather than in quadrature.

limits · Model edges Five boundaries, one tolerance, and three exponents. computed by solving, not by drawing. Each of five model boundaries re-solved at forty-one tolerances from 0.1% to 30%, divided by its own value at 0.1% so that an amplitude in millivolts and four frequencies can share one axis — an exponent has no units. Fitted over the two decades to 10%: Kirchhoff's laws 1.000, the ideal amplifier 0.513, the small-signal model 0.497, the ideal capacitor 0.500, and the full-power bandwidth 0.000. A boundary set by a first-order departure moves in proportion to the tolerance, one set by a second-order departure moves as its square root, and a refusal does not move at all — so relaxing the tolerance from 0.1% to 10% buys a factor of 100 on the board and 10.0 on the capacitor.

A boundary is a model and a tolerance

Every edge in this collection is computed from a fraction of error nobody states, and the four on its opening axis use three different ones. Swept over two decades, each boundary moves as a power of that fraction — Kirchhoff's laws exactly as the first power, the amplifier and the capacitor and the small-signal model as its square root to within three per cent, and a full-power bandwidth not at all. The exponent identifies the mechanism, and it re-orders the axis twice: the board fails before the capacitor below 0.424 per cent, and the output before the amplifier above 21.7.

limits · Model edges Two of the three are one mechanism at 19.0°; the third arrives at ninety. computed by solving, not by drawing. The cosine between each pair of error waveforms at 30.0 kHz, against how much output the ideal model is asked for. Bandwidth and slewing sit at 0.9454 — 19.0 degrees — and close only slowly, reaching 0.8813 at 16 V. Clipping does not exist below 12.00 V, where its error is 4.0e-9 per cent of the signal and its direction is the direction of rounding; above it the mechanism is real — 18.1 per cent at the top of the sweep — and its cosine against both of the others stays under 0.0025. The bandwidth error is 0.615 per cent at every amplitude here, unchanged to 5.3e-15, because a linear stage's fractional error has no amplitude in it.

Where the mechanisms are one mechanism

An amplifier is said to run out of three separate things — bandwidth, slew rate and rails — and errors from separate mechanisms add in quadrature while errors from one mechanism add as magnitudes. Measured as waveforms rather than as numbers, two of the three sit 18.4349 degrees apart, which is exactly the angle between a sinusoid and its own cube, and the third sits at ninety: its cosine against both of the others stays under 0.0025 wherever it exists. So the arithmetic is neither of the two anybody reaches for, and a budget built the right way is within 2.9 per cent where quadrature is 17 per cent low and a straight sum 37 per cent high.

limits · Small-signal Three cliffs, not one, and the fastest damping is on the last of them. computed by solving, not by drawing. Settling time against damping for a third-order response — a complex pair at unit natural frequency and a real pole at 3 — with the second-order case behind it. Both are staircases: the settling time is set by the last excursion outside the band, so there is one step for each excursion that stops happening, and there are 3 of them between 0.3 and 0.98. They are at 0.378, 0.522, 0.773, with jumps of 1.24, 1.30, 1.42. The earlier essay found the last and largest of them and did not look below it. The fastest damping is 0.775, sitting on the edge of the last step, and a design a hundredth to the left of it settles 42 per cent slower.

Three cliffs, and where they are

Sweep a second-order step's damping and the settling time falls by a third in one step of a five-thousandth sweep, which is usually called the cliff. There are three of them between 0.3 and 0.98, one for each excursion that stops leaving the band, and adding a third pole moves all three left and makes all three shallower — so the classic 0.78 for fastest two per cent settling is a second-order number, and at a third pole one and a half times the natural frequency the answer is 0.745 and 0.78 is on the wrong side of the step.

transients · Damping Three amplitudes, all of them "one per cent wrong". computed by solving, not by drawing. An exponential driven by a sinusoid has I₀(a) as its mean, 2I₁(a) as its fundamental and 2Iₙ(a) as its harmonics, all checked here against a numerical transform of the waveform itself, agreeing to 9.0e-11. Each gives a different one-per-cent boundary at 27 °C: 1.03 mV for the second harmonic, 5.17 mV for the shift in the operating point the model was linearised about, and 7.30 mV for the gain — which is 1 : 5 : 5√2 at this criterion, and the largest of them is the one usually quoted. The spacing is not a property of the device: the second harmonic is first order in the amplitude and the other two are second, so tightening the criterion to a part in ten thousand spreads the same three to 1 : 50.0 : 70.71. At a drive of one thermal voltage the bias current is 26.6% above quiescent, which is the boundary nobody counts because it moves the thing the model was built at rather than what the model predicts.

Three amplitudes, all of them one per cent

The amplitude at which linearising an exponential is one per cent wrong is 7.30 mV, and that is a statement about the gain. Two other quantities are also one per cent wrong somewhere: the second harmonic reaches one per cent at 1.03 mV and the shift in the operating point the model was linearised about reaches it at 5.17 — which is √2 below the gain boundary exactly, because the mean goes as a²/4 and the fundamental as a²/8. And the spacing is not a property of the device: tighten the criterion to a part in ten thousand and the same three spread to 1 : 50 : 70.7.

limits · Small-signal What a pair does to the three boundaries: removes two, moves one. computed by solving, not by drawing, with every harmonic taken from a transform of the waveform rather than from a series. A differential pair's transfer is an odd function, so the mean and every even harmonic are zero — -3.2e-17 and 9.1e-17 at a drive of two thermal voltages, which is absent rather than small. Two of the three one-per-cent boundaries therefore do not exist for a pair at all. The third, the loss of gain, moves by √2 in the limit of a tight criterion and by 1.42610 at the one per cent quoted here — 10.42 mV against 7.304 mV at 27 °C, against √2 = 1.41421 and 1.41433 at a criterion a hundred times tighter. So a pair reached for as headroom has bought forty per cent of it and a pair reached for as linearity has bought something else entirely. Twenty millivolts of imbalance brings the even orders straight back, which is what says the cancellation belongs to the symmetry rather than to the topology.

Two boundaries removed, and one moved

A differential pair's transfer is odd, so its mean and every even harmonic are zero — −3.2×10⁻¹⁷ and 9.1×10⁻¹⁷ at a drive of two thermal voltages, absent rather than small. Two of the three one-per-cent boundaries therefore do not exist for a pair at all. The third, the loss of gain, moves by √2 in the limit and by 1.42610 at the one per cent usually quoted: 10.42 mV against 7.304. So a pair reached for as headroom has bought forty per cent of it, and twenty millivolts of imbalance brings the even orders straight back.

limits · Small-signal At gₘRₑ = 1 a pair holds its gain to one per cent up to 29.2 mV, a single transistor to 29.9 mV. computed by solving, not by drawing, every point a waveform solved sample by sample and its fundamental read from its transform. The fractional departure of the fundamental from the small-signal gain against the peak drive, for a differential pair (solid) and a single transistor (dashed), each device with an emitter resistor of 1 times its own 1/gₘ at 27 °C. The pair reaches one per cent at 29.2 mV; the cubic law 0.4·Vₜ·(1 + gₘRₑ)^(3/2) says 29.3 mV, which holds while the drive leaves most of the tail unsteered and overstates the boundary beyond; the single transistor at 29.9 mV, a ratio of 0.974. Without degeneration the ratio was √2 in the limit; with heavy degeneration it approaches two; and near gₘRₑ = ½, where the single transistor's cubic vanishes, the single transistor briefly holds its gain longer.

Symmetry and a resistor together

A pair linearises by symmetry and an emitter resistor by feedback, and the two are normally used together. Solved together, the pair's one-per-cent gain boundary is 0.4·Vₜ times (1 + gₘRₑ) to the three-halves power up to gₘRₑ = 3: 10.4 mV bare, 29.2 mV at gₘRₑ = 1, 80.9 at 3. The √2 by which it outlasted a single transistor does not survive: at gₘRₑ = 1 the two are within three per cent, near ½ the single transistor outlasts the pair fourfold, because its cubic vanishes there and a pair's never can, and with heavy degeneration the ratio climbs to 1.95 at gₘRₑ = 50 — two, for a reason that has nothing to do with junctions: a single transistor cuts off when the drive reaches Ic·Re, and a pair has steered its whole tail at 2·Ic·Re, its two emitter resistors in series. What symmetry alone buys is the even orders, at every degeneration.

limits · Small-signal With 1 mV of offset the pair's second harmonic returns in proportion to the drive, and the third harmonic reaches one per cent first. computed by solving, not by drawing, every harmonic read from a solved waveform. A differential pair at 27 °C with 1 mV of input offset: its second harmonic (solid) and third (dashed) over its fundamental, against the peak drive, beside a single transistor's second harmonic (dotted). The third is the balanced pair's own, u²/12, and reaches one per cent at 17.9 mV whatever the offset. The second is (u/2)·tanh(Vos/2Vₜ) at small drive, the single transistor's second harmonic times tanh(Vos/2Vₜ) = 1.93e-2, and never reaches one per cent: it peaks at 0.74% as the pair begins to saturate and falls again.

The offset that brings the even orders back

A balanced pair has no second harmonic. An offset gives it one, and the closed form is exact: the second harmonic over the fundamental is (u/2)·tanh(Vos/2Vₜ), with u the drive over 2Vₜ — a single transistor's second harmonic times the fraction of the tail the offset steers aside, 1.93% of it at a millivolt, not the twentieth usually estimated. It is first order in the offset up to 9.0 mV. It does not grow with the drive for ever: it peaks as the pair saturates and falls again, so below 1.36 mV of offset it never reaches one per cent at any drive, and above 3.14 mV it reaches one per cent before the pair's own third harmonic does, at 17.9 mV. Read the other way, a matching specification is a distortion specification: −60 dB of second harmonic at 10 mV of drive allows 0.535 mV of offset.

limits · Small-signal Where a chain of 4 stages stops obeying its model, against where one stage does. computed by solving, not by drawing. amplifier, 1%: one stage 14.2 kHz, 4 stages 7.06 kHz, a ratio of 0.498; Kirchhoff, 1°: one stage 3.97 MHz, 4 stages 993 kHz, a ratio of 0.250; small-signal, 1%: one stage 7.30 mV, 4 stages 7.26 µV, a ratio of 0.000995. The amplifier's edge moves as N to the −½ because its error grows as the square of frequency; the board's as N to the −1 because a phase grows in proportion; and the small-signal edge collapses, because the last stage sees the gain of all the others.

The edge of a chain

A system built from stages that are each inside their own edge is not inside its own: the stages share one error budget. Four ×10 stages from a 1 MHz amplifier are 1% from ideal at 7.06 kHz, not at the single stage's 14.2 kHz — the edge moves as N to the −0.502. A signal path through four ten-centimetre boards is a degree long at 993 kHz, a quarter of one board's edge, as N to the −1. The chain's exponent is minus the edge's own exponent in its tolerance, measured on the line y = −x. And the small-signal edge of a chain with gain belongs to its last stage: four junction stages of ten are 1% off at 7.26 µV, a thousandth of one stage's 7.30 mV.

limits · Model edges

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Small-signal modelDesign tradeoffGain–bandwidth productModel rangeThermal voltageDifferential pairEven-order distortionSlew rateBisectionModel refusalNonlinearityVerification

All concepts