Field

Where the models stop

The boundaries as the subject rather than as a mark on something else. Four of them are frequencies and one is an amplitude; the last is the frequency at which Kirchhoff's laws themselves become an approximation, and it is set by nothing but the size of the board.

Every model has an edge

Four assumptions the circuits in this field run on, with the frequency at which each stops being true, on one axis. The ordering is not the one most readers would guess — an ordinary amplifier circuit runs out of model at 1.42 kHz, three thousand times sooner than a ten-centimetre circuit board does.

10.0 cm of track, solved as a lumped circuit and as a line. The two agree to 0.030% at 3.97 MHz, where the track is one degree long, and to 30.1% at 143 MHz, where it is a tenth of a wavelength. Above that the lumped model is not approximately right; it is describing a different object.

Kirchhoff's own frequency

The current law says the current entering a node equals the current leaving it at the same instant, which assumes the signal crosses the circuit in no time. It crosses at about two-thirds the speed of light, so the law has a frequency of its own — set by nothing but the physical size of the board.

Linearising an exponential at 27 °C, and what it costs. The linear model understates the gain by 1% at 7.30 mV and by 10% at 22.8 mV. The thermal voltage at this temperature is 25.9 mV, so "small compared with Vₜ" is not the criterion — 28% of Vₜ is already 1% wrong.

How small is small signal

Linearising an exponential replaces a curve by its tangent, which is exact at a point and progressively wrong away from it. The amplitude at which it is one per cent wrong is 7.3 millivolts at room temperature — 28 per cent of the thermal voltage, not a small fraction of it, and a good deal smaller than "small signal" suggests.

What a 0.7 V constant costs, in the quantity it is used to predict. computed by solving, not by drawing by Newton's method on the exponential at 94 supplies through four resistors. The model is exact at 5.748 mA — the current at which the true drop is 0.7 V — and every curve crosses zero there, at four different supplies. Below it the model is low and above it high, and how much depends on the headroom rather than on the diode. Through the 87 Ω curve the drop is 49 mV out at 0.725 V and 147 mV out at 150.7 V — a factor of 3.0 — while the error in the current falls from -66% to 0.10%, a factor of 674, because the headroom underneath it has grown by 2017. On that curve the model is inside one per cent only above 1.12 V.

The one current a constant is right at

Seven-tenths of a volt is the true forward drop at 5.748 milliamperes and at no other current, and every circuit built on it crosses zero error there — four different resistors at four different supplies, all exact at the same current. What decides whether the model is any good is not the diode at all; it is how much of the supply the diode is taking.

Where a switch is a switch: a band, and the 6.43 MHz at which it closes. computed by solving, not by drawing. A switch of 0.5 Ω closed, 100 MΩ open and 5 pF across it is within 1.0% of being ideal only for loads between 49.5 Ω and 1.01 MΩ — 4.31 decades, and both edges are the same part. The upper edge is a frequency as well as a resistance, because the off-capacitance shunts the open switch: it falls a decade per decade above 318 Hz and meets the lower edge at 6.43 MHz, where the band closes and no load at all will do. Checked by scanning every load at 1.3 times that frequency and finding the best possible error to be 1.17%.

A band rather than an edge

Every other boundary in this collection is one-sided: a model is true below a frequency, or below an amplitude. A switch is a switch only for loads between 49.5 ohms and 1.01 megohms — bounded at both ends by the same part — and the upper end is a frequency as well as a resistance, so the band narrows as the frequency rises and shuts completely at 6.43 megahertz, above which no load resistance at all will do.

The ideal amplifier is good to 1% over a region, and its corner is 21% inside the specifications. computed by solving, not by drawing. The 1 per cent contour of the ideal-amplifier model for a non-inverting stage of gain 2 built from a 10 MHz part, drawn over frequency and output amplitude at once. Each point is bisected on a marched circuit: the error is the root-mean-square difference between the marched output and 2 times the input, which counts the gain that is low, the phase that is late and the peak that is flat. Three mechanisms bound the region — finite gain–bandwidth on the left, the input pair's slew rate on the diagonal, and the rails at 12.19 V along the top. The two dashed lines are the numbers a data sheet gives: a small-signal edge at 48.8 kHz with no amplitude in it, and a full-power bandwidth of slew rate over 2πV̂ with no gain–bandwidth in it. They cross at 10.60 V and 48.8 kHz; the measured contour passes 38.5 kHz at that amplitude, which is 0.790 of it.

The edge that is a region

Every boundary drawn so far in this subject is a number on one axis, and the figure that gathers four of them admits in its own caption that the fifth is an amplitude and cannot go there. Drawn on both axes at once, the ideal amplifier's one per cent boundary is a region with three sides and a corner — and the corner sits at 38.5 kilohertz where the two numbers a data sheet quotes cross at 48.8, because the two mechanisms are lags on the same waveform and add as magnitudes rather than in quadrature.

The edges that are lengths

Almost every boundary in this collection is a frequency or an amplitude, and both of those are things a circuit designer chooses. A handful are lengths — the 0.60 millimetres a gap's field reaches into a window, the 200 microns between a track and its plane, the 10 centimetres at which Kirchhoff's laws are a degree out — and they behave differently in one way that matters: nobody chooses them at the schematic, they are set by whoever builds the thing, and they appear in no netlist at all.

One diode curve, eight one-decade fits, and eight different ideality factors. computed by solving, not by drawing. A junction with two conduction mechanisms — recombination near n = 2 at low current, diffusion near n = 1 above it — and a series resistance, which is what a real diode is. Fitting ln(i) against v over each decade in turn returns an ideality factor for each, and they run from 1.227 to 1.984 without being monotonic: the factor rises through the recombination region, falls through the diffusion region, and rises again where the series resistance takes over. Two of the windows are straight to a few parts in a thousand, so the residual gives no warning. The bars are what each fit predicts for the forward voltage at 1 mA: the worst is out by -186 millivolts, which is a current 0.01 times the truth.

The constant that is a window

A diode's ideality factor is quoted as a number and defined as a derivative, which means it has a value at every current and no value anywhere. Eight one-decade fits to one curve return factors from 1.23 to 1.98, two of them straight to a few parts in a thousand — so the residual gives no warning at all. Asked for the forward voltage at a milliamp, the window containing it is right to a third of a millivolt and the worst is out by 186, which is a current a hundredth of the truth.

Linearising an exponential at 125 °C, and what it costs. The linear model understates the gain by 1% at 9.69 mV and by 10% at 30.2 mV. The thermal voltage at this temperature is 34.3 mV, so "small compared with Vₜ" is not the criterion — 28% of Vₜ is already 1% wrong.

The edges that move with the room

Every boundary in this collection is quoted at one temperature and most of them are functions of it. The small-signal edge is proportional to the thermal voltage, so it runs from 5.67 millivolts at −40 degrees to 9.69 at +125 — a factor of 1.71, the ratio of the absolute temperatures exactly. A realised Q is 1.54 per cent high at one end of that range and 2.58 at the other. The numbers are right; the condition attached to them was left off, and it is the same condition every time.

A boundary is a model and a tolerance

Every edge in this collection is computed from a fraction of error nobody states, and the four on its opening axis use three different ones. Swept over two decades, each boundary moves as a power of that fraction — Kirchhoff's laws exactly as the first power, the amplifier and the capacitor and the small-signal model as its square root to within three per cent, and a full-power bandwidth not at all. The exponent identifies the mechanism, and it re-orders the axis twice: the board fails before the capacitor below 0.424 per cent, and the output before the amplifier above 21.7.

$Two of the three are one mechanism at 19.0°; the third arrives at ninety. computed by solving, not by drawing. The cosine between each pair of error waveforms at 30.0 kHz, against how much output the ideal model is asked for. Bandwidth and slewing sit at 0.9454 — 19.0 degrees — and close only slowly, reaching 0.8813 at 16 V. Clipping does not exist below 12.00 V, where its error is 4.0e-9 per cent of the signal and its direction is the direction of rounding; above it the mechanism is real — 18.1 per cent at the top of the sweep — and its cosine against both of the others stays under 0.0025. The bandwidth error is 0.615 per cent at every amplitude here, unchanged to 5.3e-15, because a linear stage's fractional error has no amplitude in it.$

Where the mechanisms are one mechanism

An amplifier is said to run out of three separate things — bandwidth, slew rate and rails — and errors from separate mechanisms add in quadrature while errors from one mechanism add as magnitudes. Measured as waveforms rather than as numbers, two of the three sit 18.4349 degrees apart, which is exactly the angle between a sinusoid and its own cube, and the third sits at ninety: its cosine against both of the others stays under 0.0025 wherever it exists. So the arithmetic is neither of the two anybody reaches for, and a budget built the right way is within 2.9 per cent where quadrature is 17 per cent low and a straight sum 37 per cent high.

Two currents called saturation: one doubles every 4.49 K, the other every 8.98 K. computed by solving, not by drawing. The two current scales of one model junction against temperature, on a logarithmic axis. The saturation current of the exponential law goes as the square of the intrinsic carrier density — a cube of the temperature and the whole band gap in a Boltzmann factor — and doubles every 4.489 K at 300 K. The generation current a reverse-biased junction actually conducts goes as the density itself, with half the band gap, and doubles every 8.978 K: exactly twice as long, at every temperature. The dashed line is "doubles every ten kelvin" drawn through the generation scale, which is the current the rule belongs to. At 300 K this junction's two scales are 10 fA and 2 nA, which are its own parameters and not a property of silicon, and they become equal only at 616.8 K, or 343.6 °C.

Two currents with one name

A junction's saturation current is two currents with one name. The one in the forward law doubles every 4.49 kelvin; the one a reverse-biased junction actually conducts is generated in its depletion region, doubles every 8.98, and on this model junction is 3.06 × 10⁵ times larger at a volt of reverse bias. Doubles every ten kelvin is the second current's rule, and applied to the first it turns the forward drop's −1.81 millivolts per kelvin into +0.39.

A fit to the held curve reads the series resistance falling to nothing at 532 K/W. computed by solving, not by drawing. Each point is a three-parameter fit — a constant, an ideality factor and a series resistance — to the held forward curve between 10 and 100 mA, for a junction built with 0.6 Ω and no temperature coefficient on it, mounted at the thermal resistance on the axis. With no thermal resistance the fit returns 0.580 Ω with a residual of 43.9 µV. At 350 K/W it returns 0.184 Ω, an ideality of 1.086 and a residual of 34.0 µV. The resistance it reports reaches zero at 531.7 K/W and is negative beyond.

The resistance a slow curve cannot see

A diode's series resistance is read off the top of its forward curve, and a bench curve is a slow one: each point is held until the junction has warmed to it. Through 350 kelvin per watt the held curve sits 39.7 millivolts below the pulsed one at 100 milliamps, and the three-parameter fit that reads 0.580 ohms from the pulsed curve reads 0.184 from the held one — with a smaller residual. The fitted resistance reaches zero at 531.7 kelvin per watt, and the resistance it hid is what keeps the junction from folding back: with 0.05 ohms instead of 0.6 the held curve turns over at 87.6 milliamps.

At 300 K one junction holds a logarithm to ±1% over 2.4 decades as a diode and 8.5 at its collector. computed by solving, not by drawing. The voltage of one model junction against the logarithm of the current it carries, as a percentage error of that current from a straight line fitted over the widest range that stays within ±1%. Taken as a diode — both mechanisms and 0.6 Ω of series resistance — the range is 2.40 decades, from 50.1 nA to 12.6 µA, and its slope is an ideality of 1.982. Taken at the collector, where the recombination current is supplied from the base and 1.604 Ω remains, it is 8.50 decades, from the axis's own end at 1 pA to 316 µA, at an ideality of 1.0001. Nothing arrives beside the collector current, so its lower end on this axis is the axis.

The logarithm is in the collector

A diode is the textbook logarithm, and a real junction holds one to within one per cent over only 2.40 decades — from 50 nanoamps to 12.6 microamps, at an ideality of 1.98 — because two mechanisms and a series resistance share its terminals. The same junction read at a transistor's collector, with its recombination current supplied from the base, holds 8.50 decades at an ideality of 1.0001. How far the logarithm reaches is decided by which terminal the current is taken from, and at the bottom of the range by a leakage current a millivolt is enough to switch on.

A hold capacitor's band closes at 6.43 MHz, where a resistor's does. computed by solving, not by drawing. The switch of 0.5 Ω closed, 100 MΩ open and 5 pF across it, driving a capacitor. The lower edge is the smallest capacitance onto which the open switch feeds through no more than 1%: 495 pF far above 318 Hz, rising as the reciprocal of frequency below it because the leakage charges the capacitor. The upper edge is the largest capacitance the closed switch tracks to 1%, counted as a vector. The two meet at 6.43 MHz; a resistor on the same switch closes at 6.43 MHz, and counted as a magnitude the capacitor's band closes at 91.6 MHz. At the closure the closed switch's phase is 0.57 degrees.

The width no load can change

A switch's band was drawn against a load resistor and closed at 6.43 megahertz. Put a hold capacitor where the resistor was and the band changes axis and shape — a diagonal below 318 hertz, a floor of 495 picofarads above it — and stays exactly as wide: 1.8083 decades at 100 kilohertz for both loads, closing at 6.43 megahertz for both. Count the capacitor's error as a magnitude, as the resistor's always was, and the band appears to stay open to 91.6 megahertz. That extra room is 8.11 degrees of lag the count cannot see.

Where 8 channels leak to: 91.0 MHz from buffered sources, 901 kHz from 50 Ω. computed by solving, not by drawing. The frequency at which the open channels of a multiplexer built from the 0.5 Ω, 100 MΩ, 5 pF switch leak 1% of the signal onto the shared output, against the impedance of the source driving the selected channel, into 1 MΩ. 2 channels: 637 MHz buffered, 6.30 MHz from 50 Ω; 8 channels: 91.0 MHz buffered, 901 kHz from 50 Ω; 16 channels: 42.4 MHz buffered, 420 kHz from 50 Ω. Each falls as the reciprocal of the source impedance plus the on-resistance, and the single switch's own band closes at 6.43 MHz.

Where an open switch leaks to

A lone switch has a band whose width no load can change, because its open state leaks into the load. In a multiplexer the seven open channels leak into a node the selected channel holds, so the load leaves the answer and the source takes its place: one per cent of leak at 91.0 megahertz from buffered sources and 901 kilohertz from fifty ohms, moving as the first power of the tolerance rather than the second. Adding the channels' capacitance into one forty-picofarad switch puts it at 804 kilohertz, near the fifty-ohm figure by coincidence and a hundred and thirteen times low for a buffered one.

$From 50 Ω into 50 Ω: a T isolates to 643 MHz, a changeover to 6.34 MHz. computed by solving, not by drawing. The fraction of the drive that arrives with the path open, against frequency, from a 50 Ω source into 50 Ω, for the 0.5 Ω, 100 MΩ, 5 pF switch used three ways. A T reaches 1% at 643 MHz; a changeover reaches 1% at 6.34 MHz; one switch reaches 1% at 3.18 MHz.$

The capacitance a third switch moves

A changeover's open channel leaks into the source of the channel that is closed, so its isolation into fifty ohms falls from 643 megahertz with a buffered source to 6.34 megahertz with a fifty-ohm one. Put a third switch to ground between two series switches and the leak lands on half an ohm of closed switch instead: 814, 643 and 2,240 megahertz from sources of nothing, fifty ohms and a kilohm, rising forty decibels a decade where a changeover's rises twenty. The price is the shunt switch's own capacitance, moved under the closed path, which makes the T one per cent wrong as a waveform at 6.59 megahertz beside the changeover's 6.61.

$One switch is never better than 70.71 ppm; a T of three reaches 10 ppb only into 200 MΩ. computed by solving, not by drawing, at direct current. The worse of a switch's two errors — closed, the fraction the load fails to receive; open, the fraction it receives anyway — against the load, for one 0.5 Ω, 100 MΩ switch and for a T of three, from a buffered source. The lone switch is best at 7.07 kΩ, the geometric mean of its two resistances, where both errors are 70.71 ppm, 13.79 bits: no load does better. The T has no best load. Its worse error falls with the load towards Rₒₙ/(Rₒₙ + Rₒff) = 5 ppb, the square of the lone switch's resistance ratio rather than its root; it is within twice that from 200 MΩ, it passes the lone switch's floor only above 14.1 kΩ, and into 7.07 kΩ it is 141.4 ppm, worse than one switch. Solved on the network up to 1000 MΩ and continued, dashed, from the closed form it matches.$

The floor below any load

A switch of half an ohm closed and a hundred megohms open is within one per cent of ideal for loads between two edges, and the edges close on each other as the tolerance tightens. At direct current they meet at 70.71 parts per million, into 7.07 kilohms: no load makes that switch better, which is 13.79 bits and a boundary with no frequency in it. A T of three such switches has no best load at all. Its error falls with the load towards five parts per billion — the square of the lone switch's resistance ratio rather than its root — and reaches ten only into two hundred megohms. Into the 7.07 kilohms that suited one switch, the T is worse than one switch.

The straight line between two models

Between a constant seven-tenths of a volt and an exponential sits the model a designer actually reaches for: a drop plus a resistance. Fitted so that its worst error over a decade of current is as small as it can be, it is out by ±8.00 millivolts where the best constant is out by ±29.76 — and both numbers are the same over every decade, because a decade of a logarithm is the same shape wherever it is taken. On a real two-mechanism junction the line does best in the top decade, ±8.71 against a constant's ±58.53, because a series resistance is exactly the term the line has and the constant has none. And the resistance the fit returns is the part's plus 701 milliohms that is not there.

Three amplitudes, all of them one per cent

The amplitude at which linearising an exponential is one per cent wrong is 7.30 mV, and that is a statement about the gain. Two other quantities are also one per cent wrong somewhere: the second harmonic reaches one per cent at 1.03 mV and the shift in the operating point the model was linearised about reaches it at 5.17 — which is √2 below the gain boundary exactly, because the mean goes as a²/4 and the fundamental as a²/8. And the spacing is not a property of the device: tighten the criterion to a part in ten thousand and the same three spread to 1 : 50 : 70.7.

What a pair does to the three boundaries: removes two, moves one. computed by solving, not by drawing, with every harmonic taken from a transform of the waveform rather than from a series. A differential pair's transfer is an odd function, so the mean and every even harmonic are zero — -3.2e-17 and 9.1e-17 at a drive of two thermal voltages, which is absent rather than small. Two of the three one-per-cent boundaries therefore do not exist for a pair at all. The third, the loss of gain, moves by √2 in the limit of a tight criterion and by 1.42610 at the one per cent quoted here — 10.42 mV against 7.304 mV at 27 °C, against √2 = 1.41421 and 1.41433 at a criterion a hundred times tighter. So a pair reached for as headroom has bought forty per cent of it and a pair reached for as linearity has bought something else entirely. Twenty millivolts of imbalance brings the even orders straight back, which is what says the cancellation belongs to the symmetry rather than to the topology.

Two boundaries removed, and one moved

A differential pair's transfer is odd, so its mean and every even harmonic are zero — −3.2×10⁻¹⁷ and 9.1×10⁻¹⁷ at a drive of two thermal voltages, absent rather than small. Two of the three one-per-cent boundaries therefore do not exist for a pair at all. The third, the loss of gain, moves by √2 in the limit and by 1.42610 at the one per cent usually quoted: 10.42 mV against 7.304. So a pair reached for as headroom has bought forty per cent of it, and twenty millivolts of imbalance brings the even orders straight back.

The best shunt switch for a T is 3.8×, 0.33×, 0.082× a series switch from sources of 0 Ω, 50 Ω, 1 kΩ. computed by solving, not by drawing. The frequency at which the band of a T closes — where no load leaves it within 1% of ideal in both states, the closed state counted as a shortfall in amplitude — against the size of its shunt switch, as a multiple of the 0.5 Ω, 100 MΩ, 5 pF series switches, with every conductance and the capacitance scaled together. From a 0 Ω source the band closes latest with a shunt 3.775 times the series switch, at 2.40 GHz, against 702 MHz with three identical switches — 3.42 times later. From a 50 Ω source the band closes latest with a shunt 0.325 times the series switch, at 243 MHz, against 89.8 MHz with three identical switches — 2.71 times later. From a 1 kΩ source the band closes latest with a shunt 0.082 times the series switch, at 59.4 MHz, against 4.53 MHz with three identical switches — 13.12 times later. A larger shunt holds the open node harder and hangs more capacitance on the closed path, and the source decides where the two meet.

The shunt switch the source sizes

A T is two series switches and a third to ground, and it is always drawn with three of the same part. The shunt switch pulls its own size two ways: larger, it holds the open node harder; larger, it hangs more capacitance on the closed path. The size at which the band closes latest is a balance of the two — the fourth root of 2/ε times √(Rₒₙ/(Rₛ + Rₒₙ)) — when the closed state is counted as an amplitude — 3.8 times a series switch from a buffered source, a third of one from fifty ohms, a twelfth from a kilohm — and it buys a band 3.4, 2.7 and 13 times wider. Counted as a waveform the root of ε goes, and from a buffered source the best shunt is exactly the series switch.

An on-resistance 10% highest at mid-range: 74.16 ppm uncalibrated, 13.89 ppm once the straight line is removed. computed by solving, not by drawing, at direct current, at 41 levels across the range. A 0.5 Ω, 100 MΩ switch whose on-resistance moves by 10%, highest at mid-range, against the load. Uncalibrated, the worse of its closed error at the worst level and its open leak is least at 7.42 kΩ, 74.16 ppm — 13.72 bits, the lone switch's floor at its largest on-resistance, against 70.71 ppm for a constant one. With the gain and offset calibrated away, what is left of the closed error is the curvature, and against the leak it is least at 1.39 kΩ: 13.89 ppm, 16.14 bits.

The resistance that bends the signal

A switch of half an ohm and a hundred megohms has a floor of 70.71 parts per million, 13.79 bits, because its on-resistance and its off-resistance cannot both be small beside one load. Most of that floor is a gain error, and a gain error calibrates away. Give the on-resistance a realistic ten per cent of movement across the signal range and the uncalibrated floor slips to 74.16 parts per million, while the part no calibration can touch — the curvature — balances the leak at 13.89 parts per million, 16.14 bits, into 1.39 kilohms. The floor was never set by the on-resistance. It is set by how much the on-resistance moves, as its square root.

With 100 pA of junction leakage at 25 °C, a T keeps 2.8 bits over one switch and loses them all by 91 °C. computed by solving, not by drawing, at direct current, at every five kelvin from 0 to 150 °C. The floor — the least worse-of-two error any load gives — of a 0.5 Ω, 100 MΩ switch alone and as a T of three, from a buffered source, with a junction leakage of 100 pA at 25 °C on every terminal, doubling every 10 K, the worse sign taken. At 25 °C the lone switch's floor is 71.06 ppm (13.78 bits) and the T's 9.998 ppm (16.61 bits). The T is worse than one switch above 91.4 °C, where the junction current equals the off-resistance's conductance at one volt. The lone switch drops below 13 bits at 101.3 °C and below 12 at 125.9 °C; the T below 16 at 37.2 °C.

The leak no switch can hold

A T of three switches reaches five parts per billion because its shunt switch holds the node a leak has to cross. A junction leakage does not cross anything: it flows out of the outer switch's terminal straight into the load. With 100 picoamperes of it at 25 °C, doubling every ten kelvin, the T's floor is 9.998 parts per million rather than five parts per billion — 16.61 bits, not 27.6 — and it has a best load again, at 100 kilohms. A lone switch loses nothing at room temperature. Above 91.4 °C, where the junction current reaches the off-resistance's conductance at one volt, the T is worse than one switch.

The boundary that is a rise time

Kirchhoff's own frequency is 3.97 megahertz for ten centimetres of track, and a one-kilohertz clock is four thousand times below it — which is the reading that concludes wrongly. Marched as the exact staircase of reflections it is, the same track leaves forty per cent of overshoot on a one-nanosecond edge and 0.40 per cent on a hundred-nanosecond one, reaching one per cent at 40.0 nanoseconds. The boundary is a rise time, it is twenty-nine times the conductor's round trip, and the repetition rate is not in it anywhere.

6 straight lines over six decades of a diode: ±8.002 mV everywhere, and they meet at every join. computed by solving, not by drawing. A pure exponential junction from a nanoamp to a milliamp, modelled by 6 drop-plus-resistance segments each spanning a current ratio of 10.00, each fitted minimax on its own window. The model's error swings between +8.002 mV and −8.002 mV in every segment, which is the closed form for that ratio, because a span of a logarithm is the same shape wherever it is taken. The dots are the joins: at each one the two neighbouring segments are off by the same amount in the same direction, so they meet, and the chain is continuous although no segment was asked to be.

How many straight lines a diode is

One drop-plus-resistance line fitted minimax over a decade of a diode's current is out by ±8.00 millivolts, and it is the same over every decade. Chain such segments over six decades, a nanoamp to a milliamp, and the error of each is a closed form in its current ratio alone. Minimax segments meet at their joins without being asked to, so the chain is a continuous piecewise-linear model for free. The error falls as the inverse square of the segment count: one segment is out by 132 mV, six by 8.00, eighteen by 0.94. A millivolt takes 18 segments and a tenth of one takes 56. A real junction needs more, 23 and 72, because recombination gives it an ideality near two over most of the range and each segment narrows by the square root of the local ideality.

$At gₘRₑ = 1 a pair holds its gain to one per cent up to 29.2 mV, a single transistor to 29.9 mV. computed by solving, not by drawing, every point a waveform solved sample by sample and its fundamental read from its transform. The fractional departure of the fundamental from the small-signal gain against the peak drive, for a differential pair (solid) and a single transistor (dashed), each device with an emitter resistor of 1 times its own 1/gₘ at 27 °C. The pair reaches one per cent at 29.2 mV; the cubic law 0.4·Vₜ·(1 + gₘRₑ)^(3/2) says 29.3 mV, which holds while the drive leaves most of the tail unsteered and overstates the boundary beyond; the single transistor at 29.9 mV, a ratio of 0.974. Without degeneration the ratio was √2 in the limit; with heavy degeneration it approaches two; and near gₘRₑ = ½, where the single transistor's cubic vanishes, the single transistor briefly holds its gain longer.$

Symmetry and a resistor together

A pair linearises by symmetry and an emitter resistor by feedback, and the two are normally used together. Solved together, the pair's one-per-cent gain boundary is 0.4·Vₜ times (1 + gₘRₑ) to the three-halves power up to gₘRₑ = 3: 10.4 mV bare, 29.2 mV at gₘRₑ = 1, 80.9 at 3. The √2 by which it outlasted a single transistor does not survive: at gₘRₑ = 1 the two are within three per cent, near ½ the single transistor outlasts the pair fourfold, because its cubic vanishes there and a pair's never can, and with heavy degeneration the ratio climbs to 1.95 at gₘRₑ = 50 — two, for a reason that has nothing to do with junctions: a single transistor cuts off when the drive reaches Ic·Re, and a pair has steered its whole tail at 2·Ic·Re, its two emitter resistors in series. What symmetry alone buys is the even orders, at every degeneration.

With 1 mV of offset the pair's second harmonic returns in proportion to the drive, and the third harmonic reaches one per cent first. computed by solving, not by drawing, every harmonic read from a solved waveform. A differential pair at 27 °C with 1 mV of input offset: its second harmonic (solid) and third (dashed) over its fundamental, against the peak drive, beside a single transistor's second harmonic (dotted). The third is the balanced pair's own, u²/12, and reaches one per cent at 17.9 mV whatever the offset. The second is (u/2)·tanh(Vos/2Vₜ) at small drive, the single transistor's second harmonic times tanh(Vos/2Vₜ) = 1.93e-2, and never reaches one per cent: it peaks at 0.74% as the pair begins to saturate and falls again.

The offset that brings the even orders back

A balanced pair has no second harmonic. An offset gives it one, and the closed form is exact: the second harmonic over the fundamental is (u/2)·tanh(Vos/2Vₜ), with u the drive over 2Vₜ — a single transistor's second harmonic times the fraction of the tail the offset steers aside, 1.93% of it at a millivolt, not the twentieth usually estimated. It is first order in the offset up to 9.0 mV. It does not grow with the drive for ever: it peaks as the pair saturates and falls again, so below 1.36 mV of offset it never reaches one per cent at any drive, and above 3.14 mV it reaches one per cent before the pair's own third harmonic does, at 17.9 mV. Read the other way, a matching specification is a distortion specification: −60 dB of second harmonic at 10 mV of drive allows 0.535 mV of offset.

10 pF on the far end of 10 cm of 50 Ω track: a 1 ns edge overshoots by 47.5% and rings near 174 MHz, against 40.0% with no capacitance. computed by solving, not by drawing, by the method of characteristics: 10 cm of 50 Ω track on FR-4 (a 0.70 ns transit), driven from 10 Ω by a 1 V edge rising in 1 ns into 200 Ω with 10 pF across it, and the far end's voltage against time. With no capacitance (dashed) the far end is the staircase of the rise-time essay, overshooting by 40.0% and settling on the divider, 0.952 V. With 10 pF the reflection is no longer a number: the capacitor first holds the far end down and then lets it swing, the overshoot is 47.5%, and the ringing is near one over 2π√(LC) = 174 MHz, with L the track's own 35.0 nH and C its own 14.0 pF plus the load's. Both settle on the divider.

The load that rings with the line

Put 10 pF on the far end of ten centimetres of 50 Ω track and the reflection stops being a number. A one-nanosecond edge from 10 Ω into 200 Ω overshoots by 47.5 per cent instead of 40.0, and rings near 174 MHz — the track's own 35 nH against its 14 pF and the load's 10 together. The one-per-cent boundary, a rise time of 39.9 ns on a bare track, becomes 50.4 ns with 10 pF and 83.4 with 50: a rise time and a capacitance together. As the load outweighs the track the lumped model comes back, missing the line's waveform by 55 per cent of the settled value with no load capacitance and by 2.2 with 200 pF. And a source matched to the line turns every capacitance's ring into a delay of about 2.2·Z₀·C.

A 1 ns edge from 10 Ω into 200 Ω on 50 Ω track stays inside one per cent of overshoot only up to 2.5 mm of track. computed by solving, not by drawing, the staircase of reflections marched against a ramp: the far end's overshoot against the track's length for a 1 ns edge, 50 Ω track on FR-4 driven from 10 Ω into 200 Ω. 2 mm: 0.79%; 5 mm: 1.98%; 10 mm: 3.98%; 20 mm: 8.07%; 50 mm: 22.93%; 100 mm: 40.00%; 200 mm: 40.00%; 500 mm: 40.00%. The longest track inside one per cent, bisected, is 2.51 mm — a round trip of 35 ps, the edge being 28.5 times it — and the rise-time boundary of that length is 0.994 ns, this edge given back.

How long a track may be

The lumped-element boundary read the way a layout is designed: given the edge, how long may the track be? For 50 Ω track driven from 10 Ω into 200 Ω, a 1 ns edge stays inside one per cent of overshoot for 2.51 mm, and every nanosecond of edge buys 2.52 mm more — proportional to within half a per cent from 0.1 ns to 30. The mismatch decides the rest. From 45 Ω the same edge may cross 23.5 mm; from 50 Ω, or anything above it into this load, no length overshoots at all; and into an open end, a CMOS input, 1.80 mm. The common rule — a track is short while its round trip is under the edge — allows 49 per cent of overshoot from a 5 Ω driver, and a tenth of its length still allows 3.3.

$Degenerated to gₘRₑ = 1, a pair with 1 mV of offset peaks at 0.41% of second harmonic, against 0.74% bare. computed by solving, not by drawing, every harmonic read from a solved waveform. The second (solid) and third (dotted) harmonics, as fractions of the fundamental, of a differential pair with 1 mV of input offset and emitter degeneration gₘRₑ = 1, against the peak drive; the same pair undegenerated in grey (dashed: second; dot-dash: third). Degeneration lowers both and moves both to larger drives. At small drive the second harmonic follows (u/4)·g″/g′² at the offset's operating point, which for a small offset is (u/2)·(Vos/2Vₜ)/(1 + gₘRₑ)³. Its largest value over all drives is 0.406 per cent at 177 mV, against 0.736 per cent at 76 mV undegenerated.$

Two decibels of matching for one of gain

An offset gives a differential pair back the second harmonic its symmetry removed. Put resistors in the emitters and that second harmonic falls as the cube of one plus gₘRₑ at a fixed input and as its square at a fixed output — measured slopes of −3.00 and −2.00 — so each decibel of gain given up buys two decibels of distortion, or two decibels more offset at the same distortion. A matching specification that allowed 0.535 mV for −60 dB at 10 mV of output allows 2.14 mV at gₘRₑ = 1. The worst case over all drives relaxes more slowly: the offset below which the second harmonic can never reach one per cent goes from 1.36 mV to 4.39 mV as gₘRₑ goes to three, because the peak it limits sits where the pair saturates, and degeneration only moves that further out.

From a 10 Ω driver with a 1 ns edge, a CMOS input of 1.5 pF allows only 0.86 mm of track — less than the bare open end's 1.80 — and one of 100 pF allows 10.9 mm. computed by solving, not by drawing, bisected on the march by characteristics: the longest 50 Ω track a 1 ns edge from a 10 Ω driver can cross into an open end with a capacitance across it and overshoot by less than one per cent, against the capacitance. With none it is 1.80 mm. 0.3 pF: 1.28 mm, 0.5 pF: 1.04 mm, 1 pF: 0.88 mm, 1.5 pF: 0.86 mm, 2 pF: 0.88 mm, 3 pF: 0.96 mm, 5 pF: 1.15 mm, 10 pF: 1.68 mm, 20 pF: 2.71 mm, 50 pF: 5.70 mm, 100 pF: 10.94 mm. The limit falls to its least, 0.86 mm, near 1.5 pF, and from there rises nearly in proportion to the capacitance (slope 0.87 between 20 and 100 pF), because the driver's resistance damps the ring the track's inductance makes with a heavy load. The slider is the driver's resistance.

The heavier input that allows a longer track

Put a capacitance across a CMOS input and the longest track a 1 ns edge from a 10 Ω driver may cross inside one per cent of overshoot does not shrink steadily. It falls from the bare open end's 1.80 mm to 0.86 mm at 1.5 pF, and then it rises — 2.71 mm at 20 pF, 10.9 at 100 — nearly in proportion to the capacitance. A heavy load turns the track into the inductor of a series RLC whose damping, (Rₛ/2)·√(C/L), the driver's resistance supplies, and at every heavy load the one-per-cent length sits at the same damping, about 0.8. So the limit scales as Rₛ²·C: a slower edge buys a 20 pF input only the 0.4 power of its length, and a stronger driver — 2 Ω instead of 10 — cuts the track it may drive from 2.71 mm to 0.20. Into a heavy input, a weak driver is the clean one.

The longest track a 1 ns edge from a 10 Ω driver may cross inside 1% overshoot, with its load lumped at the end and spread over 32 taps. computed by solving, not by drawing: a network of line segments marched by its characteristics, the load spread over equal taps with the last at the far end, the length bisected at each total capacitance. Lumped at the end (faint, the earlier essay's curve) the limit falls from 1.83 mm to 0.88 mm and rises to 10.9 mm at 100 pF. Spread over 32 taps (solid) the valley bottoms at 1.14 mm, and the limit is 29.5 mm at 100 pF — 2.70 times the lumped length — and 74.2 mm at 300 pF.

The load spread along the track

A hundred picofarads at the end of a track ring with its inductance as a series circuit, and a 1 ns edge from a 10 Ω driver may cross only 10.9 mm inside 1% of overshoot. The same hundred picofarads spread over 32 inputs along the track allow 29.5 mm, and 300 pF spread allow 74.2. Spread capacitance is not a load at the end; it lowers the line's own impedance to Z₀ divided by the square root of one plus the ratio of the added to the line's own capacitance, and slows it, and once the loaded line's impedance falls below the driver's — 8.2 Ω for 150 pF over 30 mm — every reflection at the source returns with the same sign and the far end climbs a staircase that cannot overshoot. The valley the lumped load has at a picofarad or two survives, shallower: 1.14 mm at its lowest, against 0.88. Two taps are no better than one; from eight the track is a loaded line.

A 1 ns edge from a 10 Ω driver, a trunk, and a fork into two branches each ending in 2 pF. computed by solving, not by drawing: the network of trunk and two branches marched by its characteristics, the branch length bisected for 1% overshoot at either end. Forked at the driver, each branch may be 2.33 mm, against 1.05 mm for one track carrying both inputs at its end (dashed). Every millimetre of trunk costs more than a millimetre of branch: 0.0 mm of trunk, 2.33 mm branches; 0.2 mm of trunk, 1.89 mm branches; 0.4 mm of trunk, 1.43 mm branches; 0.6 mm of trunk, 1.01 mm branches; 0.8 mm of trunk, 0.57 mm branches; 1.0 mm of trunk, 0.11 mm branches.

The track that forks

Two 2 pF inputs on one track from a 10 Ω driver with 1 ns edges may sit only 1.05 mm away inside 1% overshoot if both hang from its end. Fork the track at the driver and each branch may run 2.33 mm — more than twice as far — because two fifty-ohm branches in parallel are a 25 Ω line, half as mismatched to the driver. Every millimetre of trunk before the fork costs more than a millimetre of branch: with a millimetre of shared trunk the branches may run only 0.11 mm. Equal branches are the only good ones: a 2.2 mm branch overshoots 0.91% beside an equal partner and 1.7% beside a short one. And a star reaches further the more inputs it serves — 2.33 mm for two, 11.85 for four, where four branches in parallel make 12.5 Ω — while a daisy chain of the same inputs reaches 2.54.

Where a chain of 4 stages stops obeying its model, against where one stage does. computed by solving, not by drawing. amplifier, 1%: one stage 14.2 kHz, 4 stages 7.06 kHz, a ratio of 0.498; Kirchhoff, 1°: one stage 3.97 MHz, 4 stages 993 kHz, a ratio of 0.250; small-signal, 1%: one stage 7.30 mV, 4 stages 7.26 µV, a ratio of 0.000995. The amplifier's edge moves as N to the −½ because its error grows as the square of frequency; the board's as N to the −1 because a phase grows in proportion; and the small-signal edge collapses, because the last stage sees the gain of all the others.

The edge of a chain

A system built from stages that are each inside their own edge is not inside its own: the stages share one error budget. Four ×10 stages from a 1 MHz amplifier are 1% from ideal at 7.06 kHz, not at the single stage's 14.2 kHz — the edge moves as N to the −0.502. A signal path through four ten-centimetre boards is a degree long at 993 kHz, a quarter of one board's edge, as N to the −1. The chain's exponent is minus the edge's own exponent in its tolerance, measured on the line y = −x. And the small-signal edge of a chain with gain belongs to its last stage: four junction stages of ten are 1% off at 7.26 µV, a thousandth of one stage's 7.30 mV.

An eighteen-segment diode table built at 300 K, carried to other temperatures four ways: the worst error over six decades of current. computed by solving, not by drawing: the two-mechanism junction's law moved with temperature, eighteen equal-ratio minimax segments from 100 nA to 100 mA fitted at 300 K (worst 1.886 mV). Unchanged, the table is out by 163.0 mV at 250 K and 265.5 mV at 400 K. One shift of every drop leaves 47.14 mV and 38.32 mV at 250 and 350 K. A shift per segment leaves 3.768 mV and 3.839 mV — and 14.67 mV at 400 K. Refitting every segment on the same breakpoints holds 1.573 mV to 2.379 mV at every temperature: the breakpoints never need to move.

The table that has to be refitted

Eighteen straight segments model a real diode from 100 nA to 100 mA to within 1.886 mV at 300 K. Carried to 350 K unchanged they are 149 mV out; moved by one common shift, 38.3 mV, because the drops at the bottom of the table fall 3.31 mV a kelvin and those at the top 1.54; moved by a shift each, 3.84 mV. That last correction holds within twice the table's own error over fifty kelvin either way and fails at 400 K, where the bottom of the table has dropped below the junction's own recombination current and is no longer an exponential at all. Refitted on the same breakpoints the table holds 1.57 to 2.38 mV at every temperature: the breakpoints never need to move, and the lines always do.

A chain of identical one-pole stages: the time its step takes to settle within 1%, against the number of stages. computed by solving, not by drawing: the chain's step response is the Erlang distribution's, and its 1% settling bisected on it, held against a fourth-order march of the chain at one, four and sixteen stages. One stage settles in 4.61τ, the familiar ln 100; four in 10.0τ, sixteen in 26.7τ, a thousand and twenty-four in 1099.9τ. The frequency edge's rule, √N stretched by the bandwidth that holds 1% (faint), says sixteen stages need 4.02 times one stage's time; they need 5.81. For a long chain the settling time approaches the delay, N time constants (dashed): 1.074 of it at 1024 stages. For one stage (τ = 1.59 µs at 100 kHz) the 1% time is 7.33 µs.

The delay a chain adds

A chain of one-pole stages leaves its flat band as the square root of the number of stages, and it leaves its settling time faster: four stages take 10.0 time constants to settle within 1 per cent against one stage's 4.61, sixteen take 26.7 — 5.81 times one stage, where the frequency rule allows 4.02. The difference is a delay. The chain's step is the sum of N exponential lags, so it is an edge of mean N time constants and spread √N; the magnitude response sees only the spread. At a thousand stages the 1 per cent time is 1.074 of the delay. A chain budgeted to stay flat to 1 per cent settles to 1 per cent 45 per cent late.

At a fixed output a 0.5 mV junction mismatch's second harmonic falls as (1 + gₘRₑ)⁻² and a 1% resistor mismatch's as (1 + gₘRₑ)⁻¹: past gₘRₑ = 1.93 the resistors set it. computed by solving, not by drawing, every waveform solved arm by arm in currents. A pair on a 1 mA tail, its output held at what the bare, balanced pair gives for 10 mV of peak drive; the second harmonic over the fundamental from a 0.5 mV VBE mismatch alone (dashed), from a 1% mismatch between the emitter resistors alone (dotted), and from both in the same sense (solid), against one plus the degeneration. Between gₘRₑ = 5 and 20 the junction's falls with slope −2.00 and the resistors' with −0.89, still approaching −1, since the local slope of gₘRₑ/(1 + gₘRₑ)² is 1/gₘRₑ − 1. The resistors' mismatch is an input offset of Vₜ·gₘRₑ·δ, which grows with the degeneration that divides it, so the two cross where gₘRₑ = ΔVBE/(Vₜδ) = 1.93; beyond it each decibel of gain given up buys one decibel of distortion, not two.

The resistor mismatch that is only an offset

Two emitter resistors that differ by δ unbalance a degenerated pair, and with an ideal tail they do it in the simplest way possible: the arm currents always sum to the tail, so the mismatch adds the constant (Iₜ/2)·R·δ = Vₜ·gₘRₑ·δ to the input and nothing else. Solved arm by arm, a 1% mismatch at gₘRₑ = 3 is the balanced pair moved by 0.776 mV to 4 × 10⁻¹⁶ of the tail, and a trim of that size leaves no second harmonic at any drive. What separates it from a junction's offset is that it grows with the degeneration meant to divide it: at a fixed output its second harmonic falls as gₘRₑ/(1 + gₘRₑ)², one decibel per decibel of gain rather than two, and it takes over from 0.5 mV of base–emitter mismatch at gₘRₑ = 1.93. For −80 dB at 10 mV of output the resistors must match to 0.823% at gₘRₑ = 1 even with perfect transistors.

Eight stages of damping 0.8 against eight one-pole stages of the same bandwidth: settled within 1% at 18.75τ against 16.00τ, with 2.02% of overshoot. computed by solving, not by drawing: the step of eight identical second-order stages of damping ζ = 0.8, each with its half-power bandwidth at ω = 1, marched (solid), against eight one-pole stages with the same bandwidth from the closed Erlang step (dashed). Within 1% at 18.75τ against 16.00τ, the overshoot being 2.02% and each stage's delay 1.393 against one. At ζ = 1 the march agrees with the Erlang step of order sixteen.

The stage that overshoots a little

A stage with a little overshoot settles sooner than a one-pole stage of the same bandwidth, 3.53 time constants against 4.61 within one per cent, and a chain of them should do better still, since a stage at the right damping adds almost no spread. It does not. The saving is 17 per cent at two stages, 11 at four and 2 at eight, and at sixteen the chain is 5 per cent slower than the one-pole chain, because a stage's extra delay adds as the number of stages and the spread it removes adds only as the root. The best damping stays near 0.83 at every length, just short of letting the overshoot out of the band. In frequency the same stages are five times flatter at their best, at a different damping, and so the two edges of a chain ask for two different stages.

All essays