Circuit Response
every model has an edge, and the figure carries it
Concept

Cross term — where it appears

The part of two correlated noise generators' combined power that belongs to neither alone, twice the real part of their correlation times the source impedance. It can be negative, so a source with the right resistance or reactance sees a floor below what two independent generators allow.

Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

With each source 0.8 of the one before, 32 coherent sources cost 8.99 times the sum of their powers, and never more than 9.00. computed by solving, not by drawing, at five counts and five amplitude ratios. Sources of 10 V, 10q V, 10q² V … each reach one 100 Ω load through 100 Ω; with all in phase the load's power over the sum of each source's power alone is (Σ|a|)²/Σa² to ten figures. Equal sources (q = 1) give the count itself, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32. Falling amplitudes give less, and a limit: for q = 0.8, 1.98, 3.77, 6.41, 8.51, 8.99, tending to (1 + q)/(1 − q) = 9; for q = 0.5, 3.000 against 3. The coherent penalty counts sources by their participation, not their number.

How many sources the cross terms count

N equal coherent sources on one load deliver N times the sum of their separate powers. Sources of unequal size deliver (Σ|a|)²/Σa² times it — solved on the network to ten figures — which is the number of equal sources that would carry the same penalty: a participation ratio. Amplitudes falling by 0.8 a source cap it at (1 + q)/(1 − q) = 9 however many there are; one large source and thirty-one at a tenth of its amplitude give 12.8, not 32, and for small sources the excess is 2(N − 1)ε — their amplitudes, not their powers, so thirty-one sources carrying a hundredth of the large one's power each turn 1.31 times its power into 16.8 times it when they line up. Random amplitudes take a fixed fraction off the count, (mean)²/(mean square): 0.75 for uniform ones. And with random phases none of it matters: the load takes the sum.

networks · Superposition With a correlation of −0.3 between the two generators the bowl's bottom stays at 6.67 kΩ and its floor moves from 1.14 dB to 0.83. computed by solving, not by drawing, with the optimum found twice — in closed form and by a direct search of the noise factor, which agree to a part in a million. The 4 nV/√Hz, 0.6 pA/√Hz amplifier of the earlier essays, its two generators given a real correlation coefficient γ = −0.3. The noise figure against source resistance: the cross term 2γ·e·i·R adds the same fraction of the source's own noise at every resistance, so the bowl moves vertically and its bottom stays at e/i = 6.67 kΩ. The floor's excess over one scales as 1 + γ: 0.827 dB against 1.138 for independent generators. The slider is the correlation.

Two generators with one cause

The two-generator model of an amplifier assumes its voltage and current noise independent. Give them a correlation γ and the source sees a cross term, 2·Re(γ·e·i·Z*), linear in its resistance and its reactance. A real correlation leaves the quietest source resistance at e/i and moves the floor in proportion to 1 + γ: 0.83 dB instead of 1.14 at γ = −0.3. An imaginary one moves the optimum off the resistance axis — 5.77 kΩ with 3.33 kΩ of capacitive reactance at γ = 0.5j — and the noise figure's contours become circles about it; a resistive source cannot use it at all. If the two flicker components share one cause, the sign of the sharing decides the low-frequency floor: at 1 Hz, 3.9 dB or 18.0 instead of 15.1. And the correlation is measurable with three resistors, best with the middle one next to the optimum.

noise · Device noise

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

CoherenceCurrent noiseFlicker noiseNoise figureNoise floorOptimum source resistancePhasorReal powerRoot-sum-squareSource impedanceSuperpositionVoltage noise

All concepts